The United Kingdom’s Capitulation to Shariah Continues

[Locutus]

For well over a decade, Westerners have watched with concern as the UK has become more and more Islamisized.

As part of that insidious process, some 85 Shariah courts currently operate in the country as a parallel legal system.

Now the British embrace of Shariah is about to become more complete. As we have reported frequently in recent years, there has been a movement among politicians in the UK to make London the Western center for Shariah-compliant finance.

That process got a big boost this week with the report that British chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne has decided that the UK will become the first Western nation to issue a Shariah-compliant bond, known as a sukuk.

For a Western nation to issue sovereign debt in a Shariah-compliant fashion is profound capitulation. It is playing directly into the hands of the financial jihadists’ program of Islamic imperialism. In short, that program can be expressed thusly:

“If you want our oil wealth, you must follow our law.”

Apologists will try to explain away this atrocious development, but the fact is, this represents the surrender of Great Britain to Shariah.


http://www.shariahfinancewatch.org/...ariah-continues-apace-in-the-financial-world/

 

[Nuggler]

insanity

 

[CDNBear]

As part of that insidious process, some 85 Shariah courts currently operate in the country as a parallel legal system.

Beth din.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

So. . . British bankers are happy to give up their culture, history, and law for a bucketful of money?

Big surprise there.

 

[CDNBear]

So. . . British bankers are happy to give up their culture, history, and law for a bucketful of money?

Big surprise there.

Beth din.

 

[Blackleaf]

For well over a decade, Westerners have watched with concern as the UK has become more and more Islamisized.

The whole of the Western world itself is become Islamicised, not just the UK.

And Muslims make up a smaller share of the UK population than many of her European neighbours.

 

[Nuggler]

"They" tried to bring Shariah to Canada. They were told ........ no.

They will try again.

As soon as "they" can get enough money together to pay off our masters, we will have shariah.

The whole of the Western world itself is become Islamicised, not just the UK.

And Muslims make up a smaller share of the UK population than many of her European neighbours.

Not here. Not yet.

 

[CDNBear]

Again, Beth din.

 

[Sons of Liberty]

The whole of the Western world itself is become Islamicised, not just the UK.

And Muslims make up a smaller share of the UK population than many of her European neighbours.

Only Germany and France and you have more Muslims than the US and Canada in both absolute numbers AND per capita.

 

[CDNBear]

Oh oh!

 

[SLM]

Again, Beth din.

Yes again, lol. No one seems to be paying attention though, lol.

Now, I'm not up to speed on Rabbinical courts or where it's allowed, so how pervasive are religious tribunals and where is it allowed in Canadian law?

I should preface that by stating that while I firmly believe that the secular laws of the nation must always take precedence I really have no issue with matters being decided within a church founded arbitration system, generally speaking. Providing of course that it is agreed upon by all parties and doesn't side step the nations laws with regard to either enforcement or punishment.

 

[Nuggler]

Yes again, lol. No one seems to be paying attention though, lol.

Now, I'm not up to speed on Rabbinical courts or where it's allowed, so how pervasive are religious tribunals and where is it allowed in Canadian law?

I should preface that by stating that while I firmly believe that the secular laws of the nation must always take precedence I really have no issue with matters being decided within a church founded arbitration system, generally speaking. Providing of course that it is agreed upon by all parties and doesn't side step the nations laws with regard to either enforcement or punishment.

Good luck in your first stoning..............(and last)

The old shoe in the door, SLM. Can never allow even a bit of it.

 

[Blackleaf]

Only Germany and France and you have more Muslims than the US and Canada in both absolute numbers AND per capita.

Which proves that the US and Canada are slowly becoming Islamicised too.

And here's a stat to worry the Canadians - Canada has the second-fastest growing Muslim population in the Western world after the Republic of Ireland.

Canada's Muslim population is growing much faster than even supposedly "Islamicised Britain".

Islam is also the fastest-growing religious group in Canada.

If anybody needs to worry about Islamisation, it's the Canadians and the Irish.

 

[CDNBear]

Yes again, lol. No one seems to be paying attention though, lol.

Now, I'm not up to speed on Rabbinical courts or where it's allowed, so how pervasive are religious tribunals and where is it allowed in Canadian law?

I should preface that by stating that while I firmly believe that the secular laws of the nation must always take precedence I really have no issue with matters being decided within a church founded arbitration system, generally speaking. Providing of course that it is agreed upon by all parties and doesn't side step the nations laws with regard to either enforcement or punishment.

Good luck in your first stoning..............(and last)

The old shoe in the door, SLM. Can never allow even a bit of it.

The Beth din has been in affect in England for over a thousand years.

The supreme law of the land prevails on criminal matters, and all matter must be mutually entered into. The same as Shariah courts.

 

[SLM]

Good luck in your first stoning..............(and last)

Well that would contravene the law now wouldn't it? Lol.

The old shoe in the door, SLM. Can never allow even a bit of it.

I'm not arguing for it necessarily, just talking about it. There are precedents already for arbitration outside of a courtroom to resolve many issues. But yes, there are as many reasons, off the top of my head, why any such religious court could be a bad idea, as there are for them to work within the framework of the system we already have.

I'm just exploring the ideas. It's interesting to talk about.

 

[Sons of Liberty]

Which proves that the US and Canada are slowly becoming Islamicised too.

Not happening in the US Blackleaf. Why don't you ask her Majesty to wave her hand and do something?

 

[CDNBear]

But yes, there are as many reasons, off the top of my head, why any such religious court could be a bad idea, as there are for them to work within the framework of the system we already have.

It's worked for over a thousand years in the Beth din, with most criticism being unfounded.

Not happening in the US Blackleaf. Why don't you ask her Majesty to wave her hand and do something?

She's the Queen, not Harry Potter.

 

[SLM]

The Beth din has been in affect in England for over a thousand years.

The supreme law of the land prevails on criminal matters, and all matter must be mutually entered into. The same as Shariah courts.

So then, in a sense, we're talking about an arbitrator to the courts. Not completely dissimilar to a civil matter being resolved through arbitration. Some one sitting down with the parties outside of a courtroom and resolving the matter? Obviously if it's entered into by mutual agreement, there would be no problem with the standard being religious law vs common law I presume. Am I understanding it correctly?

It's worked for over a thousand years in the Beth din, with most criticism being unfounded.

So, off the top of my head then, seems like a way to possibly keep the courts less cluttered.

She's the Queen, not Harry Potter.

If she was, she'd be way more popular.

 

[Sons of Liberty]

Not completely dissimilar to a civil matter being resolved through arbitration.

You got it right there.

 

[CDNBear]

So then, in a sense, we're talking about an arbitrator to the courts. Not completely dissimilar to a civil matter being resolved through arbitration. Some one sitting down with the parties outside of a courtroom and resolving the matter? Obviously if it's entered into by mutual agreement, there would be no problem with the standard being religious law vs common law I presume. Am I understanding it correctly?

Yep.

So, off the top of my head then, seems like a way to possibly keep the courts less cluttered.

Yep.

If she was, she'd be way more popular.

I would hope that she wore pants while riding her broom though... 8O