High speed internet, $39.95/month
Laptop, $600
tuber the troll admitting he has nothing of merit to say...
Priceless.
College Women: Stop Getting Drunk
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
High speed internet, $39.95/month
Laptop, $600
tuber the troll admitting he has nothing of merit to say...
Priceless.
Why is it OK for you to say that to Angst, but when I say stuff like that to you, you cry like a school girl, lol.
That wasn't really a question, I already know the answer, lol.
Last edited:
Your sad. You take this internet stuff way too seriously
. Double standards are just fine, No need to change a thing. ;-)
Society & Women expect more of men, that's normal,
cause deep down they know we are superior.
Even if they don't like to admit it.
Your sad. You take this internet stuff way too seriously
Double standards are just fine, No need to change a thing. ;-)
Society & Women expect more of men, that's normal,
cause deep down they know we are superior.
Even if they don't like to admit it.
You and Gerry should get together and form a little club. Only Misogynists and chauvinists need apply.
Still batting a thousand for being wrong I see. I don't agree with angstrom, but that wouldn't fit your world view.
Women still crave the Alfa male Nick.
It's what turns them on.
You'll never find a women that's attracted to a male she is superior to.
Your trying to fight my nature of things philosophy with your politically correctness philosophy.
Nature was around a long time before correctness
laugh out loud
They want us to be superior, it's built in our DNA.
That's millions of years of evolution your trying to go against.
Nick wouldn't know anything about that at all.
I know lots of relationships where the woman is the dominant that re quite healthy.
How would you know if it's healthy. And by healthy what is healthy to you.
Bet she prolly not fulfilled sexually ,and if she was how would you know?
Oh wait don't answer that you sly dog
Lol
They're close friends, some family, long term relationships.
Long term, healthy lifestyle, well adjusted kids, overtly happy, and so on.
I'd be guessing, just like you, if I answered that.
Maybe that's why women are cheating in record setting highs these days?
Read one article just the other day, they are cheating more then males at this point.
Kinda fits my opinion that a great many women are unhappy in a dominating role.
It's hard to argue against millions of years of evolution.
Deep down women want a guy that takes charge.
Read one article just the other day, they are cheating more then males at this point.
Kinda fits my opinion that a great many women are unhappy in a dominating role.
It's hard to argue against millions of years of evolution.
Deep down women want a guy that takes charge.
Or maybe they're just getting their own, who knows.
Ummm, the few relationships I've seen fall apart, where she stepped out, the man was most definitely the dominant one. I would say it was part of the reason the relationship deteriorated.
Enlightenment is a pretty strong drive too you know.
Or maybe superiority is a trait women are at first initially attracted too.
But over time, will not be the dominating factor in the success of the relationship?
But still stays linked to sex drive.
A other good example of our natural attractions is how you rarely see a taller women with a shorter man...
But over time, will not be the dominating factor in the success of the relationship?
But still stays linked to sex drive.
A other good example of our natural attractions is how you rarely see a taller women with a shorter man...
Ah. Before you were saying 'shouldn't be allowed'.
See, I don't disagree with teaching women the reality of WHY rape is so underprosecuted. Which the article in the OP discusses. I don't disagree with that at all. But it's quite different from not allowing someone to press charges if they were drunk.
Talk about red herrings.
rape=women crying wolf
Yet somehow, I know of many women who've been the victims of rape, and zero men who've been the victim of these false rape charges that get trotted out in every single rape discussion.
No, the fact that I'm addressing 'people who come out with the rape=women crying wolf argument straight out the gate', does not mean I'm saying anything about 'men', I'm talking to individuals. I do not debate with Nick as a man. I debate with him as an individual. I do not debate with you as a man. You do not get to represent 'men'.
And yet you keep throwing them everywhere.
Remember we've had this discussion Ang?
'Women' may want strong men overall. But you don't get to date 'women', you're stuck dating individuals, and you can NEVER predict what an individual wants or needs, by any trend of their gender to behave a certain way.
Here in Massachusetts there was a case where a young woman accused two men of rape because she woke up with her clothes disheveled at their apartment. They were both arrested. The young men claimed neither of them touched her and let her sleep on the couch because she was too intoxicated to drive. Later she recanted and said she did not remember anything and that she simply awoke in a strange apartment and assumed the worse. The charges were dropped and they arrested her.
It doesn't take much of a Google search to see that false rape claims are not viewed lightly. Despite the views of some paranoid people that if a woman says she was raped, the law immediately will believe her and convict the man no matter what.
So what? This isn't about you. I doubt very much that the men here are rapists either but that doesn't reflect on the debate. You are trying to twist the OP to a feminist agenda. Go away, unless you have something pertinent to add.
Another double standard. The feminist movement has been doing that to men for years. A man who tells a joke about a woman is chauvinist, sexist and a pig, yet you call unfair when we apply the same standard to you? Nonsense. Your entire position is sexist in a misandrist tone.
That doesn't mean there are no gender trends that can be the subject of discussion without making the speaker sexist, chauvinist or a pig. You are careful not to say so but the thrust of much of your positions is that women are individuals, men are sexist. The gate swings both ways. You have grown up in a generation in which men have been lumped together and denigrated by feminism. It's time to step up to the plate and be equals. There are as many female chauvinist pigs as there are male chauvinist pigs. Most of them probably don't mean it, it is just an habitual way of thinking. Just like men.
Who, apart from you, has ever said here that women should not be "allowed" to press charges? Produce a statement to that effect. IMO you're just trying to deflect the thread into a feminist rant against men.
In Canada people do not press charges. People complain to police, police pass complaints along to crown counsel and crown counsel makes decisions whether to charge. There are many cases where men are charged on insufficient evidence to avoid political criticism. If there is bias against women it is usually by sexist police who make moral value judgments against people they disrespect, like prostitutes. That was why Piggy Picton managed to stay at large so long.
I talk to plenty of men on this forum who are capable of strong debate, who have no qualms about calling out sexism when they read it, and somehow, you're the only one crying sexism here. I wonder why that is.
Continue to try to paint me a feminist all you want, I'm not. You have no idea how I was raised, or what my views on gender dynamics is, all you know is my view of a select tiny facet of the issue.
Unless you're willing to stop the sexist tyrades and attempt to make this about my gender, perhaps YOU should leave.
Continue to try to paint me a feminist all you want, I'm not. You have no idea how I was raised, or what my views on gender dynamics is, all you know is my view of a select tiny facet of the issue.
Unless you're willing to stop the sexist tyrades and attempt to make this about my gender, perhaps YOU should leave.