Lesbian high school cheerleader...

[coldstream]

I'd say anyone who is gay in your family hides it from you because of your outspoken hatred and lack of understanding. If Gloria was a lesbian do you think she'd tell her dad Archie Bunker?

All homosexuals need to be liquored up or high to be gay? Jesus Christ! Where hell did you get that idea?

You got drunk one night and??? Tell us all about what happened if not public, PM me.

Psychiatrists changed their tune after killing thousand of gays by trying to give them hormones,

The world lost one of the most amazing and brilliant minds Alan Turing because he was given a choice, go to jail for being gay or accept hormones. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing

Do you have any idea what that did to science and the advancement of mankind?


it set us back by decades if not centuries.

We don't need anymore losses like that due to narrow minded putzes who can't deal with their own struggles of identity.

Your family would be a lot closer and tightly knitted if you weren't so arrogant.

How can you do that to your family?

Actually i'm quite sure that nobody in my immediate family.. say up to 1 degree of separation.. is in anyway a committed homosexual. That said i have worked with homosexuals... they've been in my wider social circle.. without rancor or conflict.. in fact without mention. The only way it would have been a problem if there was a demand for affirmation.. which i could not give... but basicly it just wasn't mentioned.. and posed no issue to the task at hand.

Despite your continuous attempts to implicate me i have never had a homosexual encounter.. although i was 'hit on' occasionally when i was younger.. which elicited as it does with many young men.. intense anger.. especially at an age when one is struggling to establish a MATURE sexual identity.. but that never resulted in an altercation. It might, though, have coloured my attitude somewhat to the subject.

Also, athough i had a relatively devout albeit unoppressive Catholic upbringing.. i've only returned to the Church formally (i never lost my Faith) in the last 5 or 6 years.. spurred on by the recent availability of the traditional Latin Mass and Latin Sacraments in Vancouver.. before that my experience was largely representative of the sexual mores of the rest of my generation (that of the boomers).

If you'd read my previous posts you would have noted i have not called for re-criminalization of homosexuality.. which i believe to be futile.. as its cure.. and it is a pathology.. must be one of personal committment and conversion.. not imposition. However i do have a big problem with society as a whole being browbeaten into legitimizing and celebrating what amounts to little other than a dissolution of human potential and purpose.. and a reduction of the legal definition of marriage into a complete absurdity. It sends a terrible message to young people... it could destroy lives.

I would not have prosecuted Alan Turing.. certainly not administered hormones which has NOTHING to do with the condition of a moral pathology.. or Oscar Wilde.. who btw after his imprisonment asked to be admitted to the Catholic Church.. and converted through an intense program based on the Spiritual Exercizes of St. Ignatius.. run by the Jesuits as an outreach to homosexual community in the late 19th Century. He was refused, because of his infamy.. i've alway thought to the great discredit of the Society in Britain.

... Says the guy who says homosexuals have psychological pathology.



Being drunk and horny and getting a free blow-job from a queer is the second-oldest story in the book, after paying for an escort.

Or maybe you're just broke, and can't afford booze and an escort, so you go to a gay bar and say, "Hey queer-boy, get me hammered and I'll let you suck my ****".

Compensating for *what*?!?

>face in palms< So... there's no such thing as being all wet... there's just people who've had buckets of water poured on them.

If homosexuality doesn't exist, then where did those lobbies come from?

And what were those lobbiests saying? They were saying, "Hey, listen-up chowder-head... I really *do* like sucking ****, so stop calling me pathological!"

This notion you have about homosexuality being a "compensation" act for some kind of failure doesn't jive with the fact that they have low rates of unemployment. When was the last time you heard about gays being an economic burden on society?

There used to be an expression within the homosexual community.. "show me a happy homosexual and i'll show you a gay corpse". The condition is compensatory in the way that alcholism or drug addiction is.. a retreat into carnality.. and avoidance of responsibilities and realities of life.

 

[hunboldt]

Actually i'm quite sure that nobody in my immediate family.. say up to 1 degree of separation.. is in anyway a committed homosexual. That said i have worked with homosexuals... they've been in my wider social circle.. without rancor or conflict.. in fact without mention. The only way it would have been a problem if there was a demand for affirmation.. which i could not give... but basicly it just wasn't mentioned.. and posed no issue to the task at hand.

Despite your continuous attempts to implicate me i have never had a homosexual encounter.. although i was 'hit on' occasionally when i was younger.. which elicited as it does with many young men.. intense anger.. especially at an age when one is struggling to establish a MATURE sexual identity.. but that never resulted in an altercation. It might, though, have coloured my attitude somewhat to the subject.

Also, athough i had a relatively devout albeit unoppressive Catholic upbringing.. i've only returned to the Church formally (i never lost my Faith) in the last 5 or 6 years.. spurred on by the recent availability of the traditional Latin Mass and Latin Sacraments in Vancouver.. before that my experience was largely representative of the sexual mores of the rest of my generation (that of the boomers).

If you'd read my previous posts you would have noted i have not called for re-criminalization of homosexuality.. which i believe to be futile.. as its cure.. and it is a pathology.. must be one of personal committment and conversion.. not imposition. However i do have a big problem with society as a whole being browbeaten into legitimizing and celebrating what amounts to little other than a dissolution of human potential and purpose.. and a reduction of the legal definition of marriage into a complete absurdity. It sends a terrible message to young people... it could destroy lives.

I would not have prosecuted Alan Turing.. certainly not administered hormones which has NOTHING to do with the condition of a moral pathology.. or Oscar Wilde.. who btw after his imprisonment asked to be admitted to the Catholic Church.. and converted through an intense program based on the Spiritual Exercizes of St. Ignatius.. run by the Jesuits as an outreach to homosexual community in the late 19th Century. He was refused, because of his infamy.. i've alway thought to the great discredit of the Society in Britain.



There used to be an expression within the homosexual community.. "show me a happy homosexual and i'll show you a gay corpse". The condition is compensatory in the way that alcholism or drug addiction is.. a retreat into carnality.. and avoidance of responsibilities and realities of life.

Thanks , but you still are not explaining your claim that putting Kaitlin Hunt in Prison for a 'heavy penalty' would 'cure her 'lesbianism"
Our scientific minds want to know..

 

[B00Mer]

Eh Hunboldt! You'd hump Kaitlyn Hunt, would ya.. saw your hump day photos of her lol

Little young for me..my cut off point is 21 and up.

 

[Omicron]

Thanks , but you still are not explaining your claim that putting Kaitlin Hunt in Prison for a 'heavy penalty' would 'cure her 'lesbianism"
Our scientific minds want to know..

Yeah... from what I've heard, sending a woman to prison is like a fast-track ticket strait to the muff-diver's motel.

 

[hunboldt]

Eh Hunboldt! You'd hump Kaitlyn Hunt, would ya.. saw your hump day photos of her lol

Little young for me..my cut off point is 21 and up.

You Betcha, Geezer

Boomers fantasy:

 

[petros]

She is kinda funny looking.

 

[coldstream]

Thanks , but you still are not explaining your claim that putting Kaitlin Hunt in Prison for a 'heavy penalty' would 'cure her 'lesbianism"
Our scientific minds want to know..

I should have said i have no wish to criminalize homosexuality between CONSENTING ADULTS. I have no problem prosecuting adults, priests included, who victimize youngsters or teenagers.. homosexual or heterosexual. And i believe the sentence should significant as a deterrent.

I didn't use the word 'cure'.. that was yours. Her 'cure' would have to be of her own volition.. and that would be the only remedy. No one can impose a cure for a behavioural pathology without the will and consent of the patient.

 

[Zipperfish]

The rule of thumb we always used was: Half your age plus seven is socailly acceptable.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

The rule of thumb we always used was: Half your age plus seven is socailly acceptable.

That's from Little Women.

Poofter.

 

[hunboldt]

I should have said i have no wish to criminalize homosexuality between CONSENTING ADULTS. I have no problem prosecuting adults, priests included, who victimize youngsters or teenagers.. homosexual or heterosexual. And i believe the sentence should significant as a deterrent.

I didn't use the word 'cure'.. that was yours. Her 'cure' would have to be of her own volition.. and that would be the only remedy. No one can impose a cure for a behavioural pathology without the will and consent of the patient.

Do you ever give a straight answer?
YOU called for a massive prison sentence. DEFINE IT>

Wading through 'ColdStream's book of Revelation' gets a little tiresome..

Coldstream psot #127:
laws were clearly articulated to separate out true predators.. adults.. from the crimes of children or adolescents who are not old enough to appreciate the full consequences of their actions. Adult predation on children.. as in this case.. has almost always involved serious jail time.


No more wandering down the White Rabbit hole. You called for it. Define it.

 

[coldstream]

I think your reasoning is too convoluted and confused to comprehend a straight answer, Humboldt.. i can't get any more precise than i've already been.. if you are incapable of understanding it.. then that's your problem. :roll:

 

[hunboldt]

I think your reasoning is too convoluted and confused to comprehend a straight answer, Humboldt.. i can't get any more precise than i've already been.. if you are incapable of understanding it.. then that's your problem. :roll:

White rabbit holing..........

Coldstream views the " Lesbian menace"

 

[coldstream]

Do you ever give a straight answer?
YOU called for a massive prison sentence. DEFINE IT>

Wading through 'ColdStream's book of Revelation' gets a little tiresome..

Coldstream psot #127:
laws were clearly articulated to separate out true predators.. adults.. from the crimes of children or adolescents who are not old enough to appreciate the full consequences of their actions. Adult predation on children.. as in this case.. has almost always involved serious jail time.


No more wandering down the White Rabbit hole. You called for it. Define it.

We define the age at which people become adults as 18.. 14 year olds are still children. Hence Kaitlyn is an adult.. her victim is a child. That's the definition of the crime. Whether a first offense at age 18 should involve some leniency in sentencing, i'd say it likely does.. which was offered to her.

But she subsequently ignored the conditions of her bail by continuing a sexual liaison with the girl.. involving a further felony charge of luring and sexual contact with a child.. and should have led to a charge of obstruction of justice by having contact with a material witness in her case, another serious felony. At every opportunity she has shown contempt for the justice process and aggravated her crimes.

She seems confident she will get away with it.. by framing herself as a persecuted member of a 'victims' group. She has shown no remorse or understanding of her crime.. and seems intent of continuing her relationship when released. She deserves to be made an example of.. for the protection of other children.

It is JUST as i defined it in post 127.

 

[hunboldt]

We define the age at which people become adults as 18.. 14 year olds are still children. Hence Kailtyn is an adult.. her victim is a child. That's the definition of the crime. Whether a first offense at age 18 should involve some leniency in sentencing, i'd say it likely does.. which was offered to her.

But she subsequently ignored the conditions of her bail by continuing a sexual liaison with the girl.. involving a further felony charge of luring and sexual contact with a child.. and should have led to a charge of obstruction of justice by having contact with a material witness in her case, another serious felony. At every opportunity she has shown contempt for the justice process and aggravated her crimes.

She seems confident she will get away with it.. by framing herself as a persecuted member of a 'victims' group. She has shown no remorse or understanding of her crime.. and seems intent of continuing her relationship when released. She deserves to made an example of.. for the protection of other children.

It is JUST as i defined it in post 127.

Which is why we have community psych counselling and restraining orders.... Not 'throw her in jail and lock away the keys."

BUT , Hey CS, maybe you are the Boards' answer to 'Sargent Nick"



CS, saving mankind from the ramp[aging lesbian world...

 

[Omicron]

We define the age at which people become adults as 18.. 14 year olds are still children. Hence Kailtyn is an adult.. her victim is a child. That's the definition of the crime.

That's a Civil Code interpretation of her "crime". Canada and (I recently learned) the US operate according to Common Law, so she doesn't *have* to be labeled a criminal if there are mitigating circumstances.

But she subsequently ignored the conditions of her bail by continuing a sexual liaison with the girl..

Uh huh... so... did she have to chase down and tackel the girl?

Where in any of this are we hearing what her young partner had to say about any of this?

... and should have led to a charge of obstruction of justice by having contact with a material witness in her case,

>head boggles<

As in in what? How? Did she say to the little princes, "Listen cupcake, if you testify against me I won't have sex with you anymore"?

She has shown no remorse or understanding of her crime.. and seems intent of continuing her relationship when released.

Evidence that she's not behaving with criminal intent.

She deserves to made an example of.. for the protection of other children.

My Gawd you so missed your calling as a 17th century witch prosecuter.

In any case, since you want to make a distinction between "adult" and "child", how about starting with: an "adult" is someone who's stopped growing.

We have the science to tell biologically when a body has shifted from growing to maintenance, so instead of defining "adult" by age, why not start with defining it by when they have stopped growing?

 

[coldstream]

That's a Civil Code interpretation of her "crime". Canada and (I recently learned) the US operate according to Common Law, so she doesn't *have* to be labeled a criminal if there are mitigating circumstances.



Uh huh... so... did she have to chase down and tackel the girl?

Where in any of this are we hearing what her young partner had to say about any of this?



>head boggles<

As in in what? How? Did she say to the little princes, "Listen cupcake, if you testify against me I won't have sex with you anymore"?



Evidence that she's not behaving with criminal intent.



My Gawd you so missed your calling as a 17th century witch prosecuter.

In any case, since you want to make a distinction between "adult" and "child", how about starting with: an "adult" is someone who's stopped growing.

We have the science to tell biologically when a body has shifted from growing to maintenance, so instead of defining "adult" by age, why not start with defining it by when they have stopped growing?

The U.S. works to the Criminal Code in the jurisdiction in which a crime occurred.

Common Law is the law of jurisprudence in which court rulings become precedents for prosecution or interpretion of laws, or overturning of legislative acts on Constitutional grounds. If a state declares a person an adult at age 18 and child at less than that age that is still the law.

The law deals with absolute and objective definitions.. not relative and subjective theory. Hence people are responsible for knowing the law, and acting accordingly (ignorance is not an excuse.)

People are labelled 'criminals' or 'felons' if they have been convicted of a crime. Mitigation applies to sentencing.

I've said before a child is deemed incompetent to make moral judgements.. and hence is afforded protection by the law.

 

[Omicron]

I've said before a child is deemed incompetent to make moral judgements.. and hence is afforded protection by the law.

Hmm... I dunno dude... I think I know kids better able to make "moral judgements" than you.

And speaking of "judgements", have you noticed how you don't want to see any "judgement" here? You want to see the young woman prosecuted according to the letter of the law, regardless of what a judge and jury might think.

 

[hunboldt]

actually , you did
Numerous times
the last at post # 181:
If you'd read my previous posts you would have noted i have not called for re-criminalization of homosexuality.. which i believe to be futile.. as its cure.. and it is a pathology.. must be one of personal committment and conversion.. not imposition


face it . CS, you are advocating theocratic law, not the application of common law.

Try less 'wiggle', and be concisely honest in your presentation.