Scott Walker signs restrictive abortion bill in Wisconsin

[PoliticalNick]

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.:roll:

Always the closed-minded antagonist eh? I am seriously glad your wife survived and your baby was healthy. I seriously wouldn't try to force into one decision or the other in that situation. Is that too tough for you to understand G? Does it upset you that I wouldn't interfere in your personal decision? Does it bother you that I'm not a blood hungry murderer as you would portray me?

 

[petros]

So where are these "majority stats" Nick?

 

[PoliticalNick]

We have our own too.

So why quote the US code then?

How are we interfering with what women are designed to do which is to make more humans? If making babies wasn't the sole purpose of the female, we'd all be male or no sex at all.

Ahhh, there is that oppressive attitude that runs through all pro-lifers. Women are baby factories who should be subservient to men. "Shut up and have my baby b*tch" should be your new slogan.

So where are these "majority stats" Nick?

Multiple votes and debates in the legislature. Look them up yourself. If the majority was anti-abortion we would have a law against it.

 

[Cliffy]

We have our own too.


How are we interfering with what women are designed to do which is to make more humans? If making babies wasn't the sole purpose of the female, we'd all be male or no sex at all.

Stopping that natural act is interference Bub.

Are you so completely stuck in your position that you can't comprehend what I am saying?

And women are not just here to be baby factories. That is so male chauvinist, I can't believe you said that. Woman was created last because She was the crown jewel of creation, not to be man's concubine. Man, what century were you born in?

 

[petros]

Ahhh, there is that oppressive attitude that runs through all pro-lifers. Women are baby factories who should be subservient to men. "Shut up and have my baby b*tch" should be your new slogan.



Multiple votes and debates in the legislature. Look them up yourself. If the majority was anti-abortion we would have a law against it.

Is that what I think? Women should be subservient to men? Where they f*ck did you glean that from?

Parliament is the majority of Canadians? The majority of Canadians want weed legalized but did Parliament pass a bill to legalize it because of the majority or did they do what they wanted?

The majority didn't want to go to A-Stan but what happened?

 

[gerryh]

Ahhh, there is that oppressive attitude that runs through all pro-lifers. Women are baby factories who should be subservient to men. "Shut up and have my baby b*tch" should be your new slogan.

Hey dummy, it was cliffy that brought up nature and what is natural. Petros just stated the facts concerning women and nature. No where did he say anything about being subservient to anyone.

 

[Cliffy]

Is that what I think? Women should be subservient to men? Where they f*ck did you glean that from?

"if making babies wasn't the sole purpose of the female,"- petros. What else am I supposed to make of that?

 

[gerryh]

Multiple votes and debates in the legislature. Look them up yourself. If the majority was anti-abortion we would have a law against it.

Wrong again. We had an abortion law. The SCOC struck it down, so at this time there is NO LAW when it comes to abortion. The people of Canada have not voted on squat.

 

[petros]

Are you so completely stuck in your position that you can't comprehend what I am saying?

And women are not just here to be baby factories. That is so male chauvinist, I can't believe you said that. Woman was created last because She was the crown jewel of creation, not to be man's concubine. Man, what century were you born in?

What other purpose does the female serve in nature that differs from males?

 

[PoliticalNick]

Wrong again. We had an abortion law. The SCOC struck it down, so at this time there is NO LAW when it comes to abortion. The people of Canada have not voted on squat.

I see, when the SCOC strikes down a law as unconstitutional because it denies an individual their guaranteed rights that isn't good enough for you. It didn't make a law forcing you to choose abortion ya know.

So what about that 11 year old who suffered incestuous rape, should she be able to terminate? What about someone with a different view on the value of their partner's life, should they be allowed to terminate?

I think you care not about the woman as long as another baby is born for the catholics to save.

 

[petros]

How many keep their brother's baby?

 

[PoliticalNick]

How many keep their brother's baby?

My brother died at 28 and I kept his babies. They are now grown women with minds of their own and able to make decisions without my interference or yours.

 

[gerryh]

I see, when the SCOC strikes down a law as unconstitutional because it denies an individual their guaranteed rights that isn't good enough for you. It didn't make a law forcing you to choose abortion ya know.

.

Make up your mind.... previously you stated " If the majority was anti-abortion we would have a law against it."......... we had a law, the SCOC struck it down. The SCOC is not "elected". Those that made the law originally were "elected".

 

[petros]

My brother died at 28 and I kept his babies. They are now grown women with minds of their own and able to make decisions without my interference or yours.

You brother boinked your sister and you took care of their kids? Freaky family you have going on there.

 

[PoliticalNick]

Make up your mind.... previously you stated " If the majority was anti-abortion we would have a law against it."......... we had a law, the SCOC struck it down. The SCOC is not "elected". Those that made the law originally were "elected".

Fair enough. I personally don't know many outside the catholic church who are anti-abortion so my personal experience leads me to believe a majority are pro-choice.

Now how about that raped 11 year old G? Does she get a termination or not? Are you scared to answer the question?

 

[Machjo]

Including laws about termination. So what is the big argument here. The people of Canada have spoken in a democracy and the majority support legal terminations. Live with it.

And at one point the majority supported the residential schools. In the '60s too, the English and French majorities got together to support the B&B Commission to implement the notion of two founding races. Let's not assume that the will of the majority is always right. Tyranny of the majority has sometimes supported real tyranny including cultural genocide.

 

[PoliticalNick]

You brother boinked your sister and you took care of their kids? Freaky family you have going on there.

Classy Pete! Making fun of my brother who is dead, real classy.

 

[petros]

It's a Catholic thing? If that's the case, the 46% of Canadians who are Catholic wouldn't need much help from the other 54% to make it a majority.

Classy Pete! Making fun of my brother who is dead, real classy.

Is your sister that he boinked still alive?

 

[gerryh]

It's a Catholic thing? If that's the case, the 46% of Canadians who are Catholic wouldn't need much help from the other 54% to make it a majority.

of course it's a Catholic thing. Haven't you figured that out yet? Everything with nicky is a "Catholic" thing.

 

[petros]

of course it's a Catholic thing. Haven't you figured that out yet? Everything with nicky is a "Catholic" thing.

And Cliffy