So there is no real debate then? No questioning? You're either with us or against us?
Lovelock still endorses AGW...but at a slower pace, & is turned against by the
"movement" including yourself. Kind'a spooky, don't'cha think?
Don't question the "movement" you heretics! Don't question the "settled science" unless
you are in the employ of industry that profits from the denial of AGW! If you do, you are
a phycopath! Denier! Bought by the Oil Companies!
Where there's smoke, there's usually fire....& I agree with you in that both sides don't
seem to be equal.
That's not what I'm saying.
All science is open to examination...except aparently that behind climate change denial if you look at the energy policies of many developed nations.
If you can get around the implications of significantly altering the Earth's radiative balance without rapidly driving the global climate into a new more energetic state then please explain how. Based on the Quantum Electrodynamics, thermodynamics, climatics, glaciology and paleo-climatic evidence what we're doing as far as energy sourcing is extremely stupid, and we're not even realy talking about that in an effective way. Often because the industry most closely involved doesn't want us to.