The five year rule has a history with government though, and that is likely why
they chose five years. This could open a new look at the revenue side as well.
It is my understanding that if a Canadian is abroad in America or Europe or
where ever and they do not enter Canada within a five year window they do not
have to pay taxes in the country where they are living and Canada too.
I think if someone is living elsewhere and have held onto their citizenship they
should be able to vote.
Would it be just to say, that if you lived somewhere else for more than five years
they should lose their citizenship? Of course not, therefore a Canadian with a
valid citizenship should be allowed to vote, period.
they chose five years. This could open a new look at the revenue side as well.
It is my understanding that if a Canadian is abroad in America or Europe or
where ever and they do not enter Canada within a five year window they do not
have to pay taxes in the country where they are living and Canada too.
I think if someone is living elsewhere and have held onto their citizenship they
should be able to vote.
Would it be just to say, that if you lived somewhere else for more than five years
they should lose their citizenship? Of course not, therefore a Canadian with a
valid citizenship should be allowed to vote, period.