Prairies/Alberta have the highest rates of family abuse in Canada

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Alberta No. 3 in domestic violence
Women living in rural areas at greater risk


Albertans continue to report an alarming number of domestic violence incidents to police, but a new study indicates the territories - alongside Saskatchewan and Manitoba - have the highest rates in the country.

The Statistics Canada family violence report published Tuesday also reveals a divide between rural and urban areas. Canadians - more often than not women - living outside of the country's major cities are more likely to experience violence in their romantic relationships or at the hands of family members, according to police reports filed in 2010.

Among the provinces, Alberta ranks third after Saskatchewan and Manitoba, while Ontario has the lowest rates of police-reported family violence in the country.

The study notes that between 2000 and 2010, 245 Alberta deaths were classified as a family homicide - compared with 236 in more populous British Columbia.

Trailing only Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Alberta had the highest rate of family homicides (calculated per one million people).

This isn't the first time Alberta's high levels of domestic violence have commanded attention.

Aside from police reports, Statistics Canada said in 2008 Alberta women have the highest rates of self-reported spousal violence across the 10 provinces.

Calgary has lower rates of police-reported domestic violence than Edmonton, the only other Alberta city that was analyzed.

Alberta Justice Minister Jonathan Denis said the province's Safe Communities crime reduction programs, along with a number of private initiatives, are helping to prevent and stop domestic abuse.

Denis said his department doesn't know why the province continually sees higher domestic violence numbers, but it may be because Alberta has better reporting on incidents.

Still, the minister said it's an issue everyone needs to take seriously.

"If this is disproportionately a problem in rural Alberta, that's something we'll have to look at," Denis said in an interview Tuesday.

Jan Reimer, executive direc-tor of the Alberta Council of Women's Shelters, said it's difficult to say why the numbers are higher outside of the major cities.

She said Edmonton and Calgary shelters are more often full. "Women's shelters in Edmonton and Calgary just don't have the capacity to meet the need," Reimer said.

Liberal MLA Laurie Blakeman said Alberta's economic policies set many victims up for returning to a violent partner. She said the Tory government doesn't put enough emphasis on boosting minimum wages or supporting unions that help women hold onto stable employment.

"She just can't make it, so she goes back."

Blakeman added domestic violence rates might be higher in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Alberta due to the "Western mentality" and the high number of First Nations communities.

"Violence on First Nations is absolutely through the roof," Blakeman said.

Overall the 107-page Statistics Canada study, which looks at police data collected in 2010, found women are more than twice as likely to be beaten as men, and are more likely than men to be killed because of their partner's jealousy.

The report also found the Western provinces consistently recorded the highest rates of family violence against seniors, "without exception."

 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,621
14,563
113
Low Earth Orbit
Sweet. This one dances around the issue.

The Statistics Canada family violence report published Tuesday also reveals a
divide between rural and urban areas

Well I have the balls to say it even though I'm going to hear about it but that line needs correcting. It should read: "The Statistics Canada family violence report published Tuesday also reveals a divide between rez and off rez urban areas.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Sweet. This one dances around the issue.



Well I have the balls to say it even though I'm going to hear about it but that line needs correcting. It should read: "The Statistics Canada family violence report published Tuesday also reveals a divide between rez and off rez urban areas.

good point. considering the last residential school closed in 1990! it's only natural that many First Nations parents today are simply applying the parenting skills they'd learnt in Residential school. Most of us learn parenting from our parents, but if we're forcibly separated from our parents that's not an option.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
This would explain why Ontario, with more urban centres, has less domestic violence than the Prairies/Alberta. People here are more socially in-tune with good conduct.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,621
14,563
113
Low Earth Orbit
good point. considering the last residential school closed in 1990! it's only natural that many First Nations parents today are simply applying the parenting skills they'd learnt in Residential school. Most of us learn parenting from our parents, but if we're forcibly separated from our parents that's not an option.
It has nothing to do with residential schools. It's drugs/alcohol and the stresses of poverty.

This would explain why Ontario, with more urban centres, has less domestic violence than the Prairies/Alberta. People here are more socially in-tune with good conduct.
Ontario...where the men are men and so are the women?
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
It has nothing to do with residential schools. It's drugs/alcohol and the stresses of poverty.

Ontario...where the men are men and so are the women.

And the drugs/alcohol and poverty are at least in part as a result of the residential schools. Even if they themselves never went to such a school, in most cases the parents did, so you essentially have children raised by parents with abusive nuns and priests as role models, leading in many cases to a vicious cycle.

This would explain why Ontario, with more urban centres, has less domestic violence than the Prairies/Alberta. People here are more socially in-tune with good conduct.

You have to live in the city for that?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,621
14,563
113
Low Earth Orbit
And the drugs/alcohol and poverty are at least in part as a result of the residential schools. Even if they themselves never went to such a school, in most cases the parents did, so you essentially have children raised by parents with abusive nuns and priests as role models, leading in many cases to a vicious cycle.

I never knew Protestants and Lutherans had nuns.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,621
14,563
113
Low Earth Orbit
Yup they did. I have a couple of friends who went to Lebret residential school, got educations in education and went back to Lebret to teach because it was a positive influence on their lives. They even got $34K ea in "arse money" for going to a school they loved.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Yup they did. I have a couple of friends who went to Lebret residential school, got educations in education and went back to Lebret to teach because it was a positive influence on their lives. They even got $34K ea in "arse money" for going to a school they loved.

I'm sure there were good schools too. But we all know there were many bad ones too.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,621
14,563
113
Low Earth Orbit
Yup but residential schools did nothing to induce on rez poverty or substance abuse to self-medicate with to cope with stresses of poverty.

What is the number one reason couples fight? Money?
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Suburbs are clear cuts or usurped farmland and unsustainable.

Agreed. I'd rather live in either the city or the country. Suburbs are the worse. They live outside the city becasue there is too much traffic and pollution there, ignoring the fact that the reason for that is... the suburbs they're living in.

Then we wonder why food is so expensive in the city. Well, if the burbs are pushing farmland ever farther away, it means more work and travel for farmers or truckers and more overhead costs passed on to urbanites.

Suburbanites are parasites to both sides. And they they complain of high taxes not realising if we had no suburbs cities would not need to spend so bloody much on outspread infrastructure.

Suburbanites are indeed parasites on both city and country. make a choice already.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
This would explain why Ontario, with more urban centres, has less domestic violence than the Prairies/Alberta. People here are more socially in-tune with good conduct.

That would be less reported violence. Afterall, you are in the land of Holmolka and Bernardo.... Some questionable family values going on there.

Ontario...where the men are men and so are the women?

haha... Flossy in that category?

I'm sure there were good schools too. But we all know there were many bad ones too.

No, you don't know, you're just parroting the lines you've heard on this issue. The little Freudian slip on Nuns makes your position extremely clear. Your position on the Catholic church is well documented
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Suburbanites are indeed parasites on both city and country. make a choice already.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suburbanites are still citiots at heart. They should not be let loose in rural areas since first thing they do is demand a bunch of useless rules, interupt our lives and tell us we can no longer earn a living as we have for generations because it is disrupting to the lifestyle they want.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,621
14,563
113
Low Earth Orbit
Suburbanites are indeed parasites on both city and country. make a choice already.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suburbanites are still citiots at heart. They should not be let loose in rural areas since first thing they do is demand a bunch of useless rules, interupt our lives and tell us we can no longer earn a living as we have for generations because it is disrupting to the lifestyle they want.
Ever notice there aren't shopping carts and old appliances plugging up streams and rivers in the countryside?
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Suburbanites are indeed parasites on both city and country. make a choice already.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suburbanites are still citiots at heart. They should not be let loose in rural areas since first thing they do is demand a bunch of useless rules, interupt our lives and tell us we can no longer earn a living as we have for generations because it is disrupting to the lifestyle they want.

Suburbanites are probably the worst consumers of natural resources and, ironically enough, often the most vocal critics thereof without even realizing it's because of them we need so much.

They complain of traffic congestion caused by... oh they ignore that one too.

Definitely, make a choice already.

That would be less reported violence. Afterall, you are in the land of Holmolka and Bernardo.... Some questionable family values going on there.



haha... Flossy in that category?



Your position on the Catholic church is well documented

You're referring to equality in the constitution? Terrible isn't it. Bigots like me asking for equality. It's just shameful. Clearly asking for special rights for some is the way to go. I'm not converted yet but just keep talking and you might win me over.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Suburbanites are probably the worst consumers of natural resources and, ironically enough, often the most vocal critics thereof without even realizing it's because of them we need so much.

I'd agree to that, but it doesn't say anything about domestic disputes.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I'd agree to that, but it doesn't say anything about domestic disputes.

True enough, I did get off topic there.

However, seeing how resource dependent suburbs are on a per-capita basis compared to country and city, imagine how many economic resources we could save if we scrapped suburbs that could then go towards family education and such.