You and I may leave any time we wish. There are countries that you may not leave.
Government kills independent science body
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
This one's starting to heat up and Baird might need to do some serious backpeddling.
Did Baird let slip the truth?
A Brief Moment of Clarity from Harper's Conservatives
The Commons: John Baird saves your family - Beyond The Commons, Capital Read - Macleans.ca
Did Baird let slip the truth?
A Brief Moment of Clarity from Harper's Conservatives
The Commons: John Baird saves your family - Beyond The Commons, Capital Read - Macleans.ca
It's pointless to discuss anything with you (haha - just kidding; you can't discuss). Your style is to perpetually yell 'fire' in the proverbial crowded theatre.
That's not an option to guys like redmonton or MF... They demand that you are forced to live in a society based exclusively on how they define it... Interesting version of 'freedom' they have, ain't it?
This coming from the guy who thinks that a well-documented Nature article is tinfoil, rofl
Ah, so based on your Nature article, you and redmonton have expertly concluded that we are living in a military dictatorship.
gotcha
wtf?!
Minister offers contradictory rationale for shutting down advisory panel
Environment Minister Peter Kent had initially said the reason for the closure was because such research can now be easily accessed through the Internet, and through universities and other think tanks.
But Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird said Monday the shuttering of the round table had more to do with the content of the research itself.
Environment panel's end blamed on support for carbon tax - Politics - CBC News
Environment Minister Peter Kent had initially said the reason for the closure was because such research can now be easily accessed through the Internet, and through universities and other think tanks.
But Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird said Monday the shuttering of the round table had more to do with the content of the research itself.
Environment panel's end blamed on support for carbon tax - Politics - CBC News
<a href="http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/how-to-be-a-good-liberal/blog-228771/?link=ibaf&imgurl=http://firstfriday.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/liberal_boy.gif&q=dumb as+a+bag+of+hammers"><img src="http://firstfriday.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/liberal_boy.gif"><br>dumb as+a+bag+of+hammers pics on Sodahead</a>
Still learning how to post links and pics? You'll figure it out one day.
Actually, there is a valid scientific argument for some kind of carbon tax, but at the same time I don't see the point of wasting money on an organization the government will ignore anyway.
Well, Cap'n! Where to begin. Your post suggests that you think you know something about the climate change matter . It actually displays overwhelming ignorance.
Stern is a most respected economist. One affirded the highest honours by the British government and no "Left" Winger. His report was of studies done for the British government but about climate change in general not just the effects on Britain. It was a report on the economic implications.
And they were hopeful if the issue was addressed immediately but scarier by the decade if not. We are now at about the 2% cost thanks to Bush and Harper primarily. The only political leaders who deliberately prevented action.
Harper is now alone in the world in that.
As for Mann (not Stern) and the Hockey Stick, you must be about the only one left who still takes comfort from that fraud MccIntyre's slanders.
Stern is a most respected economist. One affirded the highest honours by the British government and no "Left" Winger. His report was of studies done for the British government but about climate change in general not just the effects on Britain. It was a report on the economic implications.
And they were hopeful if the issue was addressed immediately but scarier by the decade if not. We are now at about the 2% cost thanks to Bush and Harper primarily. The only political leaders who deliberately prevented action.
Harper is now alone in the world in that.
As for Mann (not Stern) and the Hockey Stick, you must be about the only one left who still takes comfort from that fraud MccIntyre's slanders.
Still learning how to post links and pics? You'll figure it out one day.
Like this?
Practice makes perfect I always say
Private organizations are doing the same.
Heck, I've known the advantages of a carbon tax of some kind for awhile and simply through general reading.
:roll:
It's usually less credible though because the results may be tied to corporate profit.
Too funny... Lord Stern had his ass handed to him on the hockey stick graph and resulting theory... Red noise replicated his results almost exactly, whoda thunk it that plotting random points on a graph would debunk that fraudster; such a simple solution
But you continue on with your adoration of Stern and willful ignorance of the political lack of will to do anything about it, especially the non-participation of the globes 2 largest emitters... That alone should tell you that the entire movement is a facade.
Not all privately funded research organizations are for-profit. Some are supported by donations.