NASA: Tar sands is the "dirtiest of fuels"

[L Gilbert]

Water.

Explain.

 

[petros]

Ask a water scientist.

 

[L Gilbert]

Ask a water scientist.

You can't. I see.

 

[B00Mer]

Anyway, there probably hasn't been as much damage to the planet caused by any other substance as crude by a long shot.

If you want to make a case, start with photosynthesis. The plant basically captures the carbon in the atmosphere. It stores it, even after death, until we dig it up in the form of oil and release it back into the atmosphere..

In short, putting back into the atmosphere what has been captured millions of years ago..

Because the layers of sediment build up over years under ground we are basically taking a million of years of built up carbon captured through photosynthesis and releasing it back into the atmosphere in a time span 1/10,000 of the time period ...

Sound logical, or total BS L Gilbert ????

Photosynthesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[L Gilbert]

If you want to make a case, start with photosynthesis. The plant basically captures the carbon in the atmosphere. It stores it, even after death, until we dig it up in the form of oil and release it back into the atmosphere..

In short, putting back into the atmosphere what has been captured millions of years ago..

Because the layers of sediment build up over years under ground we are basically taking a million of years of built up carbon captured through photosynthesis and releasing it back into the atmosphere in a time span 1/10,000 of the time period ...

Sound logical, or total BS L Gilbert ????

Photosynthesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As much as taking a million years of sunlight and bombarding the planet with it over 100 years.

 

[petros]

You can't. I see.

Ohhhh I can. No problem. What would you like to know about water's destructive behaviors?

As much as taking a million years of sunlight and bombarding the planet with it over 100 years.

Just one million?

 

[L Gilbert]

Ohhhh I can. No problem. What would you like to know about water's destructive behaviors?

Go for it.

 

[B00Mer]

As much as taking a million years of sunlight and bombarding the planet with it over 100 years.

now you got it.. ;-)

 

[L Gilbert]

Just one million?

It was Boomer's number.

now you got it.. ;-)

I never missed it.

 

[B00Mer]

Just one million?

Guesstimation, I'm old.. just not that old.

I never missed it.

o.k.

 

[petros]

Is that the guy who dug the Grand Canyon?

 

[L Gilbert]

Is that the guy who dug the Grand Canyon?

and did he actually damage anything? Or did he just move dirt around?

 

[petros]

It would have killed oodles of life. Nothing has killed more life than water.

 

[L Gilbert]

It would have killed oodles of life. Nothing has killed more life than water.

You make the claim, you prove it.

https://www.google.ca/search?rlz=1C1GGGE_enCA433CA434&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=total+global+damage+done+by+petroleum#hl=en&gs_nf=1&pq=total%20global%20damage%20done%20by%20petroleum&cp=15&gs_id=1n&xhr=t&q=list+ecological+damage+done+by+petroleum&pf=p&rlz=1C1GGGE_enCA433CA434&sclient=psy-ab&oq=list+ecological+damage+done+by+petroleum&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1770c6232f6a2377&biw=1897&bih=933

 

[petros]

You need proof?

LMFAO!

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

Are you related to Omnicron, MHz and Cabbagefarts?

You make the claim, you prove it.

https://www.google.ca/search?rlz=1C1GGGE_enCA433CA434&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=total+global+damage+done+by+petroleum#hl=en&gs_nf=1&pq=total%20global%20damage%20done%20by%20petroleum&cp=15&gs_id=1n&xhr=t&q=list+ecological+damage+done+by+petroleum&pf=p&rlz=1C1GGGE_enCA433CA434&sclient=psy-ab&oq=list+ecological+damage+done+by+petroleum&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1770c6232f6a2377&biw=1897&bih=933

https://www.google.ca/search?rlz=1C....,cf.osb&fp=30427757ebafe35d&biw=1400&bih=911

 

[B00Mer]

later.. going to play Ikariam - The free browser game

 

[L Gilbert]

You need proof?

Just wondering if you can back up your comment.

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

perhaps, but I'm still way more than you can handdle.

Are you related to Omnicron, MHz and Cabbagefarts?

Nope.

 

[petros]

Explain how water ISN'T the most destructive substance on the planet.

 

[L Gilbert]

Explain how water ISN'T the most destructive substance on the planet.

Logical fallacy. Same idea would be as if I suggested you explain how petroleum isn't.
I guess you can't support your claim. That's not exactly news.

 

[petros]

No no no. You claimed petroleum was the most destructive substance on the planet. Is it or is water? Prove it.