Warren Buffett backs Keystone pipeline

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67
Billionaire Warren Buffett said this week he supports the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline, inserting himself in a politically divisive debate on the project.

"I’m not an expert, but it certainly seems like it makes sense to me,” Buffett said Monday when asked on Fox Business Network whether he would support the pipeline if it doesn’t threaten an environmentally sensitive region in Nebraska.

“There are an awful lot of pipelines running in the United States and net, they've certainly been a huge plus for the country.”

But Buffett — an Obama supporter whose name has been used by the White House to sell a plan to increase taxes on the rich — steered clear of criticizing the president.

“I don’t think that issue is done with yet,” Buffett said when asked whether he was disappointed in President Obama’s decision to reject a key permit for the project in January.




The president has insisted that the decision was based not on the merits of the pipeline, but rather on an expedited timeline backed by the GOP that forced him to make a quick decision. Keystone developer TransCanada reapplied for the permit late last week, setting up the latest political battle over the project, which would carry oil sands crude from Alberta, Canada, to refineries on the Gulf Coast. Meanwhile, lawmakers are set to discuss a House Republican transportation bill later Tuesday that would force approval of the project.

In the interview, Buffett dismissed claims by supporters of Keystone that the federal government should quickly approve it to create thousands of jobs.

“The jobs aspect of it is not the big aspect of it. The real question is what it will do for the country over many years and what the drawbacks are,” he said.

“You can build anything and it will create jobs. That doesn’t mean it’s a great idea.”
Republicans, industry groups and other supporters of the pipeline have argued for years that approval of the project would create thousands of jobs and boost the economy.

But opponents say those jobs numbers are inflated and raise a slew of environmental concerns, included the possibility of oil spills along the route and increased greenhouse gas emissions from oil sands production.
Buffett is the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, headquartered in Nebraska. The state has been a key battleground over the pipeline, with officials raising concerns the original route would threaten the Nebraska Sandhills, an environmentally sensitive region, and the Ogallala aquifer.

TransCanada and Nebraska officials have plotted out a new route that avoids the Sandhills, though it still touches part of the aquifer. The new route has won over many Nebraska officials, but environmental groups continue to raise concerns.


source:

Warren Buffett backs Keystone pipeline - The Hill's E2-Wire
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,305
14,662
113
Low Earth Orbit
Pipe for XL



MADE IN CANADA!
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
I don't think Obama is against the pipeline - as he just approved the southern leg not too long ago. He just wants the northern part to go around the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska as getting oil in people's drinking water is a pretty stupid thing to do.

Transcanada's complied and just sent in a revised plan for approval last week so everything is moving as expected.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,305
14,662
113
Low Earth Orbit
South part of Keystone. Keystone XL is yet to be approved. I'm going to keep correcting that until it sinks in that there are two lines with one already in service for 18 months.

Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska is already heavily nitrate contaminated from agriculture.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Do you enjoy just repeating my posts as if it is continuing the discussion?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,305
14,662
113
Low Earth Orbit
When are you going to learn that keystone and keystone XL are not one in the same? Two lines, one destination. Expect 8 more over the next 10 years.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
When are you going to learn that keystone and keystone XL are not one in the same? Two lines, one destination. Expect 8 more over the next 10 years.

Yes, but the point is that Obama is not "against" either.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,305
14,662
113
Low Earth Orbit
Why did they have to go around polluted waters? Somebody didn't bother to explain that to greens?


The map above shows information about two separate, unrelated water quality issues:

    • Impaired lakes and streams -- Black bold lines and triangles on the map indicate river segments and lakes that are considered impaired, indicating that the intended use has not been met due to water quality problems. Many of the problems are related to bacteria, but other problems exist as well. Dissolved oxygen, nutrients, mercury, selenium, sediments and atrazine are among the most common.
    • Nitrates -- Red dots indicate wells with nitrate contamination greater than the drinking water limit of 10 parts per million (ppm). Nebraska’s 23 local Natural Resources Districts use the groundwater quality data to make management decisions aimed at reducing groundwater contamination, which is mainly from nonpoint (diffuse) sources such as long term use of fertilizer and ag chemicals.
 
Last edited:

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
This is what separates you from being a skeptic into a denier.

About 27 percent of the irrigated land in the United States overlies this aquifer system, which yields about 30 percent of the nation's ground water used for irrigation. In addition, the aquifer system provides drinking water to 82 percent of the people who live within the aquifer boundary.[2]
Ogallala Aquifer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia