Yeah, 'cause the coal goes out by rail...the number of trains is stunning.
SaskPower is enlarging many of their plants, as well.
SaskPower is enlarging many of their plants, as well.
As it stands, the oil/gas industry is being vilified as it is the cause du jour with the environmental lobbies. Allowing a non gvt lobby group dictate national policy is nothing more than a fool's errand.
And shifting to nat gas too. Sour gas. There is 3X as much sour gas as sweet and it's dirt cheap.Yeah, 'cause the coal goes out by rail...the number of trains is stunning.
SaskPower is enlarging many of their plants, as well.
Cleaning up is fine but the ****ing carbon bank is a massive scam on the people of the planet.Everyone knows that oil/gas is a primitive, non-renewable construct that we need to give up in favour of clean tech. As the reality of anthropogenic climate change finally begins to enter the minds of the few, honest conservatives or republicans out there, you will also see a swift change in energy policy. And since the science is patently obvious now, then it's the science that should pave the way for that future policy.
Regardless of how we organize such policy - whether it be by some governmental group or a separate agent - following sound science needs to be enforced just as much as economic concerns. That means important investments in legitimate, clean tech and gravitating away from the oil sector.
Cleaning up is fine but the ****ing carbon bank is a massive scam on the people of the planet.
The coal industry has been vilified for years, didn't Ontario pledge to shut down all coal fired power plants?
I get paid $6 per acre seeded by using zero till knives. How many litres of fuel went into that acre to produce a "green crop" eligible for a carbon credit?
A little less because you normally don't have to cultivate. In my region we had to cultivate this year to drop moisture conent to avoid root rot and stem rust.So is it safe to assume that it requires more fuel to seed that way petros?
I did. "seeded by using zero till knives".
How many liters go into one acre of wheat whether zero till or or disc seeder?
Why are you asking me things I have no idea about?
Then how can you say there is no scam?
I'll be fair and give you my averages per acre to produce spring wheat.
Fuel: 26L
Nitrogen and phosphates 110lbs (nitrogen sourced from nat gas)
2L of petro sourced herbicide.
That doesn't include fuel used to move finished product to market, fuel to have fertilizer, pesticides and seed delivered, or fuel used in baling and moving bales.
In reality it's around 30L per acre. Does that one acre remove 30L equivilant of carbon?
It's a scam. A HUGE scam. If i wanted i could plant trees at $20 a pop for an airline. How much carbon does a sapling reduce in the 5 years I'm required to tend to that tree? After 5 years I can plow it under and plant more $20 trees.My point is that there was no implication or promise of carbon reductions based on fuel usage in the contract. The people who bought into the "scam" didn't take the time to read the fine print.