I am a little concerned about this whole situation. I'm most afraid that France might surrender just out of habit.
What's a sinic?
What's a sinic?
Security Council accepts No Fly Zone
- Thread starter Durry
- Start date
Libya is going to report that civilians were killed regardless. It forces the hand of the no fly zone. Are they attacking, or are they ensuring that there are no military air strikes? If they're attacking, and kill innocent civilians, someone will have to investigate. That violates the "no land personel" agreement. What to do? Keep bombing and ignore civilian casualty concerns? There was footage of rebels riding around on tanks. How can a fighter plane tell the difference?
Another thing I was thinking....we should be counseling Ka-daffy instead of bombing him. He obviously has self esteem issues. Most people with supreme power would make themselves a general and not a lowly colonel. It's quite obvious that he doesn't feel he's good enough.
They are attacking every thing that moves it how a war unofficial or otherwise is fought.
All this talk about someone investigating is a mute point, the allies will beat the hell out
of Libya and nothing will be investigated, beside the major powers are not subject to an
international court and America does not recognize international courts period.
France, Britain, and the United States are going all out to secure the oil fields and also
to establish a government friendly to the west, the leadership of Libya will be the only
ones on the benches of an international court.
Of course civilians get killed in wars, its part of the conflict and despite what is said
scaring civilians is part of the war effort. In the Second World War it was part of the
everyday contest of wills. For the victors, the first rule of war is ,, There ain't no rules.
All this talk about someone investigating is a mute point, the allies will beat the hell out
of Libya and nothing will be investigated, beside the major powers are not subject to an
international court and America does not recognize international courts period.
France, Britain, and the United States are going all out to secure the oil fields and also
to establish a government friendly to the west, the leadership of Libya will be the only
ones on the benches of an international court.
Of course civilians get killed in wars, its part of the conflict and despite what is said
scaring civilians is part of the war effort. In the Second World War it was part of the
everyday contest of wills. For the victors, the first rule of war is ,, There ain't no rules.
But isn't this move to ensure that the UN order of a no-fly zone is observed? War? Are these countries attacking Libya, or enforcing a no-fly zone? Is this war if that's what it takes to secure the oil?
Here is the BS.
Your whining about Canadian problems in the light of our moving to help in Libya is like a rich fat man complaining about famine relief because he does not have enough cream cheese on his bagel.
Last edited:
Does that have anything to do with the remark made in France by the Austrian Princess (what was her name again ???) ... "Then let them eat cake?" It's not about cream cheese, it's about smoked salmon and capers. This is not about sending troops, I think, but rather what it is they are doing. Are they enforcing a no fly zone by the Libyan government over their own air space, or are they taking pot shots at the ground ... er ... civilians. ... to protect their oil interest?
Congratulations on mastering the most butch of a woman ... do you smoke cigars or haul engines?
Thanx.
Exports, with the filter ripped off, and I dress left. Even if it is just latex...
Ya that's exactly what I said!
I don't care, nuke them all and let Allah sort them out.
Do you think irradiated oil will make gas that will make our cars fly?
The latter, only this time the towel heads get to play Custer!
But was it like futuristic and glowing and all that?
Maybe. But I was wondering if you knew what sarcasm was?
Monumentally.
No doubt. To much liberal pacification in Canadian schools.