All Christians are hypocrits, except for those who aren't.
No Sh*t :lol::lol:
All Christians are hypocrits, except for those who aren't.
You're either daft or drunk or stoned. Your post makes no sense.
Hast thou replenished thine dilithium crystals for I fear thine impulse power may fall second bested to warp drive....
By all means, warp drive. Commit a sin once in awhile while your at it, might serve you good, don't worry we'll get you feeling human again. Cheers! :angel7:
Stepped in shyte again huh?
Yes, honourable Commander Sir! :lol:
It won't comfort you to know that Nuns beat kids at every school they ever ran. In the school you were in whites were the ones going to heaven so they were exempted more often, their lesson was tow the line as we define it or you will be treated just like the ones being beaten. Today that would be a Court battle and the victim would be richer and the abuser would be handling things in a different way. All these schools were sanctioned by the Federal Gov and the Gov had to know the policy, they may have even demanded special treatment for Native children over the White children. They should be in Court sitting right beside the Pope. Once that may can be shown to be a did the cash should flow twice as fast as long as it doesn't turn into as 20 years bonanza for the Lawyers alone.Several years ago when I went from being a Mod at an adult forum to arguing politics. I was so anti Christian, it was palpable.
Between being abused in the name of Christ by Catholic Nuns, to the shots at my wife's sexuality, and our chosen brand of kink. To say I had an issue with organized religion, was to make a monumental understatement.
Now I wasn't sexually abused by anyone, but I was physically abused. I had the unmitigated nerve to be born Native AND left handed. How dare I! I was repeatedly strapped and our whipped with a Rosary, for instinctively crossing myself with my left hand. I was never believed when i reported being bullied by the white pupils. None of us little red bastards were.
As I grew up and escaped the Church, I still came up against religious nut bars. I was once asked by a fellow employee what the little satchel around my neck was. Once I explained to him what a medicine pouch was, he asked if I believed in God and Jesus. I told him not as the Church does. His reply, "OH, you're going to hell."
This is by no means an isolated incident. I have traveled extensively across Canada, the US and much of the Globe and no matter where I went, you could find those of such faith, as to preach you perpetual pain in hell, all because you don't embrace Christ as they do. Rest assured though, wayward Christians certainly don't have a lock on that type of thinking.
All this only fed my hate and justified my contempt. I eventually sought out Christians to exact my revenge upon. Even confronting a Priest in an restaurant and asking him quite sincerely about his beliefs in homosexuality. He gave me exactly what I wanted, according to him it was a sin. Without even being prompted, he explained Leviticus to me, quoting passage and verse. I then quoted passage and verse of Leviticus, about it being a sin to eat shellfish, as he raised a pealed shrimp to his mouth.
Am I confrontational? You bet, no denying it. It's my nature.
It took me years to get over the scars left by the Church. I still don't believe in organized religion. I'm pretty much what you would call a traditional, in Native spirituality terms. But I can see the good in the Church, I even came to understand how it influenced the development of the west and how that has benefited people like me.
I guess this is a process of maturity that some people go through, when they open their minds. Some people take years to pull it off, some never do. I see a lot of the latter here.
So, here we are. Take your shots at the Church here. Doesn't matter which one. Roman Catholic, Anglican, whatever. Come sh!t on them here. I mean some of you obviously have some deep irrational issues with the Church of (insert you choice here). Hell, some of you can't even separate reality from fiction, or isolate an issue. You generalize and encompass whole groups of people with your BS. But because you think you have a lock on righteousness, you seem comfortable to negate whole groups and justify your asinine rhetoric, without ever doing any self examination.
Pollute one thread with your immature trolling and jabs. Instead of trying to incite religious wars in every thread.
Agreed, which is why I admitted it in the OP.Personally i think there are some people who go out of their way, in fact invite negative interactions with religious thought, by challenging others on their beliefs or wearing their lack of belief on their sleeves.
Again, agreed, which is why I no longer do it. Even though I see the stereotypes in many. Oddly enough though, those stereotypes are not just the badge of Christians.It's part of their own metaphysical system to reduce religious types, and especially Christians, to simple minded stereotypes, rigid in thinking, puritanical in morals, tunnel visioned in intellectual attitudes.
I looked in the mirror, didn't like what I saw, I looked into the virtual faces of those I sought to offend and chastise and saw me. I grew from that.They should look in the mirror. You can't find anything more rigid, puritanical, narrow minded and generally misanthropic than modern atheism or its name sake, secular humanism. The stereotypes it proponents develop don't represent the large body of Christian believers, and especially Catholics, with its deep intellectual roots of introspection and extrospection (dealing with both the subject and object of God and Man).
If this is directed at me. I think you may have missed the point of the OP.So go on, if it makes you feel better, nurture your illusions. :smile:
YJ, again, you have missed an opportunity to grow, or at the very least learn and get a glimpse of who we/I are/am. If it helps you maintain your image of me and many others, so as to keep the fuel flowing to your hate, feel free to wallow in your own crapulence."The Official "Lets bash Christians" thread.."
Hey, CNNBear and like-minded yahooes:
How would you feel if someone had started a thread: "The official let's bash Indians" thread?
I don't think he can read, Karrie.Did you read the OP?
Well said Durka.I'm not a big fan of organized religion but I try to respect those who do, which can be difficult at times I will admit. Live and let live usually applies well to religion, respect my right not to believe or to be agnostic and I respect your right to believe.
:lol:, Gh you're such a big old softy you...;-)Just remember to keep the bashing in here and not in the other threads...otherwise Ron will have a sh*tload of deleting to do as I tear you a nice new huge asshole.
Am:5:19:Moral of the story: No matter what, YOU are star of the show, but choose wisely for GOD is lurking around.
When some institution is being bashed the quality of the person doing the bashing is part of the topic, you do it in every thread you post on. To bash Christianity you first need a verse saying they are following the instructions given in the NT.If this is directed at me. I think you may have missed the point of the OP.
You can try and justify the idiocy all you want. Your quotation does not overwrite Leviticus.Since the time you mentioned the eating thing have you read the verse that says Christians obey the NT and not the OT when it comes to food? The Priest was apparently naive of the verse below also.
Is there a question in there?Would you have felt envy that the Priest knew less about OT Law than you did, yet he was regarded as being the one favored by God, as far as status in the White community.
So that justifies the other?The 'other' school system also had the 'strap' so it was not punishment free by any means and óffice'was the word used rather than 'hell', that was saved for Sunday school. The segregation was based on the larger/smaller factor mostly.
Again, is there a question in there?Why are the Christians that are out doing things that are nor defined by some specific verse a;ways still labeled as Christians an that indicates the Bible promotes some behaviors when it actually says the opposite, quite plainly in most cases.
I think you and YJ should get together, perhaps the two of you might register a blip on a PET scan together. As it stands, both of you seem to have missed the point and the gist of the OP. And seem to be among the few.Once you have decided this one has filled it's mission are you going to start one on the Jews and then one on the Muslims, and so on or is this thread about a Bear got a thorn in his paw and he needs some assistance in getting it removed.
Passive.You say the Church made you confrontational, what were you like before they go hold of you, confrontational or passive?
You think? That's a rhetorical question by the way.There's a time those traits are the most appropriate reaction to a certain social situation. Take the shell fish example, why did you bring it up with the Priest, didn't like him or was it a way to strike back at the Nuns.
Prove it. Jesus trumps Moses as far as I know. The Royal Laws are written in stone.You can try and justify the idiocy all you want. Your quotation does not overwrite Leviticus.
If there was a question mark at the end it would be, my fuk up so no it isn't, apparently.Is there a question in there?
No, it means Indian kids weren't the only given the strap in the Christian school system.So that justifies the other?
If there was a question mark at the end it would be, my fuk up so no it isn't, apparently.Again, is there a question in there?
I think you and YJ should get together, perhaps the two of you might register a blip on a PET scan together. As it stands, both of you seem to have missed the point and the gist of the OP. And seem to be among the few.
Can you get back to that same state of mind whenever you want or can a little piss-ant wreck your day???Passive.
And this is a passive/aggressive thread. Why not just a thread about things that piss you off??You think? That's a rhetorical question by the way.
Know why God chose the name? When you're God you don't need a fancy name.Christians. Boooo!
It's a joke.
You didn't read the OP either did you? And if you did, you missed the point competely.When some institution is being bashed the quality of the person doing the bashing is part of the topic, you do it in every thread you post on. To bash Christianity you first need a verse saying they are following the instructions given in the NT.
It's funny you say that, because the OP is pretty mush saying that.Lurking is hiding, God left a Book to show He wasn't hiding anything. Moral of the story is kill the lion and let the bear eat him and stay out of other people's houses unless they invite you in.
Again missing the point...Prove it. Jesus trumps Moses as far as I know. The Royal Laws are written in stone.
Apparently.my fuk up so no it isn't, apparently.
So in other words, it negates the affect?No, it means Indian kids weren't the only given the strap in the Christian school system.
Again, apparently.my fuk up so no it isn't, apparently.
Wreck my day? Hardly, I enjoy watching some of you people dance. You're one of my favourites.Can you get back to that same state of mind whenever you want or can a little piss-ant wreck your day???
Again, a glaring example of how you missed the point of the OP. Thanks for coming out mhz.And this is a passive/aggressive thread. Why not just a thread about things that piss you off??
I doubt if it will keep it out of other threads...because in other threads it is used profusely and even admittedly by some members, one in particular along with other insulting phrases ....simply to antagonize someone opposed to their viewpoint....
But......good luck with it.....hmm seems like I have to spread it around before repping you for that post:smile: