"To a conservative, any initiative to preserve environment, whether it is turning off lights for one hour, taking steps to reduce global warming, or trying to save endangered species (or recycling), is a load of fertilizer.
As I have mentioned before, it comes from their interpretation of the Bible ("subdue the earth, conquer it, dominate it", not "preserve it, conserve it, nurture it"))."
I am trying to do something here that you have never learned: answer a post, sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph, rather than what you always do, namely, picking out a sentence to which - in your imagination - you have a valid response.
As a conservative, and a capitalist and a money-grabber, I DO TURN OUT THE LIGHTS when I don't use them, because it saves me money.
Once you prove me that the warming on Mars, Jupiter and even the outer planets is caused by conservatives and their SUV's I will concede that you and Al Gore are right.
Once you prove that the polar bears are facing extinction (in spite the fact that there are more polar bears now than 10 years ago) I will concede that you and David Suzuki are right.
Once you make a valid claim that the world is worse off because some species died off, I will conceed that you are right.
Once you prove that you recycle and I don't, I will concede that you are right.
Once you prove that the Bible says that Man should destroy the Earth, not preserve it and nurture it, I will concede that you are right.
And, finally, your post and pretty much all your posts, here and on any and all other threads are nothing but a load of fertilizer.
You just contradicted yourself all over the place....to funny.:lol:
Plus, if what to cahllenge the science of AGW I'm sure Tonnington is only to happy to school you on the subject.
Perhaps he can explain evolution as well......:lol: