Yeah. It's a good thing the theory of evolution isn't thrown out everytime something is noticed that needs correction.
Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
- Status
There are a few interesting papers about evolution, but it would be impossible to introduce something here not approved by the Academy of Cheese.
You can introduce anything you like here. It helps to introduce stuff that makes sense, though. lol
Are you suggesting special extra legal considerations for the celebrity scientists and managers? The charge is not simply having made mistakes or shock at standard shop talk, it's about crime Tonnington. They ran a sloppy operation and it was closed to scrutiny even though it was funded publicly. This alerted the critical thinkers to the possibility of cooking, which was subsequently proved to be the case. There is no doubt as to what the projects mission was. Anything for a buck.
The magnetic field is powered from the sun any change in power transmission to this planet result in climate change, as you know climate change is in constant fluctuation, that fluctuation is electrical and magnetic. There is no normal earth climate, and absolutely nothing can be done to adjust solar output when the buttons are far removed from this planet. So the entire CO2 theater has nothing to do with climate reality and everything to do with global politics and central management in the pressing crisis. History is full of observed earth rotational phenomena including stops and running backward.All of that produced devastating climate changes those are recorded as well.
Any revision I could offer about McCarthy would be a rerevision.
No... Not even you. In fact, I believe that you have a basic foundation in critical analysis, however, the fact that you are so myopic in your vision, incapable of original thought, lacking flexibility, devoid of creativity and arrogant - well, that erases any of the intelligent design that you might have possibly ever contributed.
As far as the rest of the CanadianContent.Com crew - I have varying degrees of respect for all.
The "wreck" started the very moment that you got all puffed-up and proud and declared that YOU had the answers to all of the Earth's ails... Tell ya what champ - if you have all the answers, maybe think about getting in touch with the CRU at East Anglia and the UN and YOU can set the entire globe straight on what's-what.
You are almost as pompass as Suzuki.
Bull sh*t!.. You made an infantile attempt in trying to lure me into a different direction as you full well knew that you had your t*t in a ringer on the whole polar migration element (or polar reversal as you believe to be the equilivent).
Here's the 411 for you as you are clearly unable to fill in the blanks (despite my multiple hints for you): Alteration of the positioning of the magnetic poles is a SYMPTOM of something else...
Are you so daft that you are unable to put this together?
See above Poindexter... Perhaps some day you will be capable of thinking for yourself rather than relying on the stats, graphs and opinions developed by someone else... Really, you are the quintessential parrot of all-things-science. You have zero capacity to think for yourself and what's worse, you vehemently rail against those that don't share your view, or rather,someone else's view that you claim as your own.
Goebbles would have loved you.
Do not insult the rest of CanadianContent participants by deliberatly associating yourself with them... As an individual, you have carved-out your own niche in this community.
Here is what I know has nothing to do with "Global Warming". It is not associated with the El Niño or La Niña conditions.
Evidence reported by Rickaby and Halloran adds to the growing list of research that suggests that the La Niña conditions persist in the central Pacific during warmer periods (see here and here for example). Since, in general, El Niño events tend to cause more widespread weather extremes than La Niña, and since it is en vogue to attempt to link all extreme weather with global warming, naturally, the press and global warming alarmists have been quick to jump on the Kevin Trenberth-led bandwagon that global warming will lead to more and bigger El Niños. Fact is that there is precious little evidence to back up these claims and a growing amount of contrary data.
"(NASA) - Climatologists have long known that human-produced greenhouse gases have been the dominant drivers of Earth's observed warming since the start of the Industrial Revolution. But other factors also affect our planet's temperature. Of these, the ocean plays a dominant role. Its effects helped nudge global temperatures slightly higher in 2009, and, according to NASA scientists, could well contribute to making 2010 the warmest year on record."
http://www.kold.com/Global/story.asp?S=12038969
This is what I do know. Increase level's of CO2 is one reason causing our median temperature to rise, which somewhere along the line will cause massive methane releases.
Here is that runaway horse your looking for, named "Reasons".
Evidence reported by Rickaby and Halloran adds to the growing list of research that suggests that the La Niña conditions persist in the central Pacific during warmer periods (see here and here for example). Since, in general, El Niño events tend to cause more widespread weather extremes than La Niña, and since it is en vogue to attempt to link all extreme weather with global warming, naturally, the press and global warming alarmists have been quick to jump on the Kevin Trenberth-led bandwagon that global warming will lead to more and bigger El Niños. Fact is that there is precious little evidence to back up these claims and a growing amount of contrary data.
"(NASA) - Climatologists have long known that human-produced greenhouse gases have been the dominant drivers of Earth's observed warming since the start of the Industrial Revolution. But other factors also affect our planet's temperature. Of these, the ocean plays a dominant role. Its effects helped nudge global temperatures slightly higher in 2009, and, according to NASA scientists, could well contribute to making 2010 the warmest year on record."
http://www.kold.com/Global/story.asp?S=12038969
This is what I do know. Increase level's of CO2 is one reason causing our median temperature to rise, which somewhere along the line will cause massive methane releases.
Here is that runaway horse your looking for, named "Reasons".
I do not believe that the core issue is whether the globe is warming or cooling in terms of an overall trend. Ultimately, that cycle has occurred in the past and will be observable far into the future. In my mind, this issue is in question based on the contention(s) of establishing "why" these fluctuations/cycles exist.
To my knowledge, there is no one individual/group anywhere that has a reasonably complete answer to the question "why" - regardless of their position on the subject.
In the end, there is a push to take aggressive actions in applying solution(s) to the changes. I see this action as highly concerning in light that we (as a global society) are not even remotely capable of ascertaining if this is anything other than a natural expression of the natural cycle itself or if it is caused by humanity.
So you agree with me that this climate change people call global warming isn't a scam.
I agree that there is a natural cycle, but I don't agree that humans haven't had an impact.
Personally, I think why we have climate cycles is because of a number of factors from solar cycles, just having an atmosphere and water, changes in reflectivity, changes in orbit, etc.
So? Some predictions are off and others are accurate. Do you have a point or are you just in a trigger happy cut&paste mode again?
I think that the "scam" part relates to the push by some groups to profit from the confusion.
Relative to the remainder of what you suggest - I also agree with what you have stated, including the notion that humanity kicks-into the equation from everything to respiring CO2 to the use of gasoline, nuclear experimentation (ie blasts), etc.. All of these things, among many many examples of how humanity contributes some input into the system, the question in my mind is if these inputs are large enough to significantly influence something like climate.
As you pointed-out, the variables like solar input and those terrestrial factors relating to naturally occurring systems also play an important role.
I certainly do not have the answers and quite honestly believe that no one does at this point in time.
I always laugh when the people who are trying to save us from ourselves are portrayed as the bad guys.
All those evil people trying to protect water, air and soil quality... and now the overall global climate itself... shame on you.:lol:
- Status