lol I think Canadians could be better off becoming Anishinabek or Salish or Inu than by trying to convert us to whatever it is a Canadian is (American wannabe?).
First Nations Treaties
- Thread starter gerryh
- Start date
Ugh, me name Gerry. Me get club and fix everything. lmao Ugh. Better yet, me get other people to kill and get killed so I can sit back and watch. I need entertainment. Ugh
And I bet that this kind of stupidity would even convince a few Ukrainian people, black people, Irish people, etc. to side with us.When you run low on cash, can you just arbitrarily tell your mortgage company to lower your rates?
Wrong again, they broke off one small faction of Mohawk. The Nations stand united to this day.
Final solution?
Ya vole mien fuhrer.
All I can say is bring it. I'm willing to join in. I will fight to maintain my right to sovereignty. So long the battle righteous, I'll be the fat one in war paint, sportin' the crossbow and the C7.
BTW: You mock the MWS all you want, you and I are both aware that its day came and went. Any group that would take my brothers, isn't all that wise, nor intelligent. But you want to see a resugence, an influx of recruitment and volunteers? Push us hard, break your words with us.
I'll bet we even get US support in southern Kebec.
The crown is definitely an impediment to treaties. the British crown made treaties and now the Cdn crown is stuck with them. We're no longer British like we were, or in 1763, in fact, Canada as we know it did not exist then. The day of treaties is long gone like the meaning the crown used to have amongst the people.
Give about 20 years notice, and each aboriginal about $15000 year for adjusting. For many, the land on their reserve isn't worth much, but for some near Vancouver, it's worth a fortune.
Give about 20 years notice, and each aboriginal about $15000 year for adjusting. For many, the land on their reserve isn't worth much, but for some near Vancouver, it's worth a fortune.
Re: The Crown as an Impediment
The Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, for the purposes of those treaties, is the same as The Crown of Canada, dumpthemonarchy. The Canadian Crown is everything that the British Crown was before Confederation, and then became a separate institution. Those treaties are just as much Canadian as they are British, and I would argue moreso. They were negotiated with the decided end-result of a stable and prosperous colony (read: Canada).
I don’t think that The Crown has lost its meaning—and I would even venture to say that this is particularly so with Canada’s Aboriginal peoples. A vast majority of these treaties are not an agreement between a people and a Government—they are a treaty between a people and The Crown, the very sovereignty and entity of Canada as a nation, not an administration or a governing party. It is extremely important that we deal with the treaty issue properly—and that means that we can revoke these treaties only through proper constitutional channels, and with the participation and agreement of a majority of the Aboriginal community. We cannot strip the special status that has been for centuries a constitutional fact, without risking violence, upheaval and the scorn of the United Nations and our neighbours on the world stage.
The Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, for the purposes of those treaties, is the same as The Crown of Canada, dumpthemonarchy. The Canadian Crown is everything that the British Crown was before Confederation, and then became a separate institution. Those treaties are just as much Canadian as they are British, and I would argue moreso. They were negotiated with the decided end-result of a stable and prosperous colony (read: Canada).
I don’t think that The Crown has lost its meaning—and I would even venture to say that this is particularly so with Canada’s Aboriginal peoples. A vast majority of these treaties are not an agreement between a people and a Government—they are a treaty between a people and The Crown, the very sovereignty and entity of Canada as a nation, not an administration or a governing party. It is extremely important that we deal with the treaty issue properly—and that means that we can revoke these treaties only through proper constitutional channels, and with the participation and agreement of a majority of the Aboriginal community. We cannot strip the special status that has been for centuries a constitutional fact, without risking violence, upheaval and the scorn of the United Nations and our neighbours on the world stage.
Woot! I'll take my 300K now please. (I've already "adjusted" and would love to go visit Kiwi and a couple Aussie friends). People like my Dad adjust to anything and can still retain the old ways).
People like the Okanagans have "adjusted" and are keeping their traditions as well as using Canadian ways.BTW, what that 300K adds up to is $4,900,500,000,000,000,000 over 20 years. I don't think taxpayers would like the idea.
Last edited:
Are you out of your tree???????? We've given those whiny little children and leeches enough already. As I said, at the most 10k and then it's sink or swim. No more paying for their booze.
lol I think Canadians could be better off becoming Anishinabek or Salish or Inu than by trying to convert us to whatever it is a Canadian is (American wannabe?).
Cut off the money supply and we'll see how long before they come crawling.
Have you noticed how most new oil or minerals and ALL the kimberlite are on worthless scrap land set aside for reserves?
and your point is? The average Canadian citizen does not own the mineral rights to the land they are sitting on, and it should be the same for everyone.
The point is: Who's doing the crawling? Mineral rights mean bugger all if you can't get to the site to excavate.
BTW ... you know what the word "should" is worth don't you?
lol I think Canadians could be better off becoming Anishinabek or Salish or Inu than by trying to convert us to whatever it is a Canadian is (American wannabe?).
Hey, this gives me an idea. What if the First Nations were free to grant 'citizenship' to those Canadians who pass their 'citizenship' tests? Now that might be an incentive to learn the culture. After all, let's face it, which side of the Treaty would anyone want to be on?
And you can have it.
Start a thread, this isn't it.
So I can go squat on some unused land anywhere I find it? :lol:
:lol:...Ya ok. Stop making assumptions based on media hyperbole.
Agreed.
Maybe.
Sorry, no. She was mimicking you. But I guess that or most anything isn't very obvious to you.
lol Canada can take back the rezzes and give them the land they had before Eyropeans came along and screwed everything up, in that case. They never needed money before then.
Guess that points to the fact that a lot of what the Europeans brought with them was screwed up to begin with.
Anyway, Pilgrim, if you don't like it start a petition or lobby the gov't, because there's no point snivelling about it here other than trolling.
I would think people would want to be on the sensible side. (That'd be the side where everyone benefits).