I guess my sentiments are little different from the mainstream. When it comes to guys f*****g around with little children, I think any accomplishments are automatically negated. How can the harm of destroying a child be compensated?
Michael Jackson dead at 50
- Thread starter Socrates the Greek
- Start date
I have to say i never really 'got' Michael's music. To me it fit into the genre of Disco, Dance, Pop, Rap that has always competed with what i deemed more complex and interesting (and therefor less commercial) Jazz, Blues, serious Rock. But he was undoubtedly an icon as well as a tortured soul. RIP.
Last edited:
It was never demonstrated that he did any such thing. The first case was settled out of court (for about $3 million I think) and the details didn't become public as far as I know. The whole thing struck me as greedy parents trying to exploit a situation for financial gain. In the second he was acquitted. What you're saying is actionable; it's libel.
Not really, because he didn't actually claim that MJ did anything, he posed a hypothetical question.
Strange how money will allow a person to change their facial identity.
View attachment 1116
View attachment 1117
View attachment 1116
View attachment 1117
YOU'RE WRONG- he's considered a celebrity, but regardless, it doesn't take rocket science to figure out he was guilty, may be proving it is tough, but knowing it isn't.
When is bedtime at the Jackson house? When the big hand touches the little hand.
Why does this seem strange to you? I've seen many people who have had their facades changed (burns and stuff like that). Cosmetic surgery is just an offshoot and money is needed for both. Doesn't seem particularly strange to me, anyway.