Tamil Protesters Sacrifice Children In Toronto

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
I'm going to march through their protest in a lime green speedo, that will clear them out. :smile:

That was you today!?!8O Man you've got to lay off the Cheetos!



And that fountain on University isn't a swimming pool ya hairy mofo! :p
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
LTTE was responsible for killing Rajiv Gandhi, the former Prime Minister of India. Murdering politicians from other countries would probably be considered terrorism by most.

You are aware of Rajiv Ghani's waging open warfare with the Tiger's correct? (and his plans to Annex Sri Lanka that had the Sinhalese majority force the Indians out)

In which case no, killing the head of an enemy invading military is NOT terrorism.

Im not saying they are good people, as stated they are bad people. Much like North Korea and South Korea is the Tigers and Sri Lanka. While North Korea are villainous they are not Terrorists but a state (even if technically there is only the state of Korea and north and south are both just factions in a civil war even today). So too were the Tigers a defacto state.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
You are aware of Rajiv Ghani's waging open warfare with the Tiger's correct? (and his plans to Annex Sri Lanka that had the Sinhalese majority force the Indians out)

In which case no, killing the head of an enemy invading military is NOT terrorism.

Im not saying they are good people, as stated they are bad people. Much like North Korea and South Korea is the Tigers and Sri Lanka. While North Korea are villainous they are not Terrorists but a state (even if technically there is only the state of Korea and north and south are both just factions in a civil war even today). So too were the Tigers a defacto state.

I'm sorry to not be pc enough, but targetting civilians (which they have done over and over) makes them terrorists. I would understand civilians getting hit in the crossfire, but not making them the bulls eye. The Tigers ran a defacto state, but that doesn't mean they should be immune from being called terrorists. It's not much different from Libya in that case.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
When the police or military start to move them off the highway the children will get hurt first That,s the way terrorists work.

Oh whatever, get bent.

Maybe they're trying to teach their children how to stand up for what they believe in - something few Canadians seem to know anything about.

I suppose those that scream "human shield" and "terrorism" every time we blow up a school are too busy teaching their children to goose step.

Bloody fascists.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
72
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Besides, there's nothing in the article that said the kids were "forced" up front, just that they linked arms and stood at the front.
The protesters --including women and children in strollers-- said they ........Teenage girls linked arms and stood face to face with police when the demonstration began at about 7 p.m. Sunday.
Liberalman leaps with both feet directly into the middle of Lake A$$umption where its over his bombastic head yet again.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
Maybe they're trying to teach their children how to stand up for what they believe in - something few Canadians seem to know anything about.
.

You actually think it's a good idea to bring kids onto a highway like that for a protest? That's crazy. Aside from the obvious danger of cars before the police blocked them off, there is also the risk of them being hurt if protesters or police scuffle. It's possible to teach your kids to stand up for what they believe in without doing that. Whatever... as long as they don't complain if their child is injured. Maybe that's what it would have taken for them to realize that blocking the street with the Children's Hospital was a bad idea.

I have to say, I was always pretty sympathetic to their desire for their own country. I can disagree with many of their tactics. This is one of them. Whether they were intentionally used as shields or not doesn't really matter. It was a bad idea.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
72
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
I'm not exactly sure the teens were brought. The ones in strollers were. But I wouldn't think the kids would not be the ones to stop the flow of traffic at first anyway. But, there isn't enough info in the article to make statements like who stopped traffic or whatever. Though, I am pretty sure not very many women would tell their kid to wander out on a highway to block traffic so that they could follow them out there safely.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
You actually think it's a good idea to bring kids onto a highway like that for a protest? That's crazy. Aside from the obvious danger of cars before the police blocked them off, there is also the risk of them being hurt if protesters or police scuffle. It's possible to teach your kids to stand up for what they believe in without doing that. Whatever... as long as they don't complain if their child is injured. Maybe that's what it would have taken for them to realize that blocking the street with the Children's Hospital was a bad idea.

I have to say, I was always pretty sympathetic to their desire for their own country. I can disagree with many of their tactics. This is one of them. Whether they were intentionally used as shields or not doesn't really matter. It was a bad idea.

I never said I thought it was a good idea but it's definitely better than writing letters to Oprah. That's the problem with this country, we've turned into a nation of wussies.

Besides, it's only a bad idea because the government and police are a bunch of savages. In a real democracy it would be perfectly acceptable, even preferable.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
It's not just the police they have to worry about. In a real democracy, doesn't majority rule? I doubt the majority were ok with what they did.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
It's not just the police they have to worry about. In a real democracy, doesn't majority rule? I doubt the majority were ok with what they did.

Not really, democracy was an attempt to get away from lynch mobs not validate them.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I never said I thought it was a good idea but it's definitely better than writing letters to Oprah. That's the problem with this country, we've turned into a nation of wussies.
How interesting, a nation of wussies...but then you say the Gov't and Police are savages. How thick is that line you see between justifiable force and savagery?

Besides, it's only a bad idea because the government and police are a bunch of savages.


Even as a Native, that has been in protests, been arrested, done time, I have to laugh at that asinine comment.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
Even as a Native, that has been in protests, been arrested, done time, I have to laugh at that asinine comment.

Well now, that's quite a resume, lie much? :lol:

Every single native person I know, without exception, would agree with me let alone one as bad ass as your pretending to be.

Everything you write sounds like a right wing white boy, then you come up with this crap?

LMAO. :lol: :lol:
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Well now, that's quite a resume, lie much? :lol:

Every single native person I know, without exception, would agree with me let alone one as bad ass as your pretending to be.

Everything you write sounds like a right wing white boy, then you come up with this crap?

LMAO. :lol: :lol:


http://forums.canadiancontent.net/introductions/49883-belch-bears-cave.html

Then of course you can just follow the name CDNBear around the internet and see for yourself, but hey, way to defend your asinine argument...
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
Defend what argument? That you sound like a right wing white boy? That isn't an argument its a statement of my subjective opinion. There are an unbelievable number of morons in Canada that claim they're native because they think it makes them bad ass. Just because your grandma was part native doesn't mean you are. LMAO :lol:

Anyway, I don't have time right now to bother with you but don't let that keep you from posting more BS. ;-)
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Defend what argument? That you sound like a right wing white boy? That isn't an argument its a statement of my subjective opinion. There are an unbelievable number of morons in Canada that claim they're native because they think it makes them bad ass. Just because your grandma was part native doesn't mean you are. LMAO :lol:

Anyway, I don't have time right now to bother with you but don't let that keep you from posting more BS. ;-)


Yep, that was a great come back...I must be lying because I don't tow the company line. I have my own thoughts and use objectivity in my life, unlike some of my follow community members, including some of my own relatives in the MWS. But hey, you say I'm lying so the 4 years of battling bigots and ignorant people about Native issues at this site and many others was just for show...

You really should have taken a walk through my threads and posts before making yourself look so foolish Snott.

All these accusations and slanderous comments because I question your objectivity and rationality, minus insults? Wow, you're as big a joke as SJP and MHz.
 
Last edited:

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Sorry, Z, people that use terrorist tactics are quite likely to be called terrorists. See the links I posted earlier in this thread.

I'm sorry to not be pc enough, but targetting civilians (which they have done over and over) makes them terrorists. I would understand civilians getting hit in the crossfire, but not making them the bulls eye. The Tigers ran a defacto state, but that doesn't mean they should be immune from being called terrorists. It's not much different from Libya in that case.


Again, that brings in ALOT of states into the equation. I am not claiming they are not bad people. A rapist and a serial killer are both bad people too, but they each have their own specific names.

Are you seriously trying to pretend the tigers even hold a damn candle to north korea in terms of civilians killed, terror inducing tactics?

Libya is a perfect example of how they should have been treated. A state sponsor of Terrorism.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Defend what argument? That you sound like a right wing white boy? That isn't an argument its a statement of my subjective opinion. There are an unbelievable number of morons in Canada that claim they're native because they think it makes them bad ass. Just because your grandma was part native doesn't mean you are. LMAO :lol:

Anyway, I don't have time right now to bother with you but don't let that keep you from posting more BS. ;-)



Wait, so you are white if you have a white ancestor, but only native if all of your ancestors are native?

You know natives didn't have any stricter racial controls than anyone else (well, most tribes, some were bigots).

If someone has a white parent and a native parent they can be natives. If that person has a white spouse their children can be native too as one parent is still native. Why would they be "white boys"? Thats some pretty blatant racial purity BS right there.