Bit
You really haven't given much to this topic other than one-liners bashing the terrible conditions in Afghan - seemingly directly related to the
"invasion" by western militia.
Do you really believe this to be the case? Even in your own reference to the World Food Donations - much funding has already been given and yet you (and the article) seek to condemn only the U.S. for its lack of donor monies. Section of the article reprinted here:
Which Afghans will suffer as UN food aid funds run out?
Kabul, 26 May 2006 - Insecurity is increasing across Afghanistan as insurgents step up attacks against government and international forces. This violence is severely hampering humanitarian and development activities across much of the country.
But WFP also faces another serious threat to its operations – rapidly dwindling funds and food stocks.
Without an extra US$31.1 million, the agency will be forced to scale back its activities in Afghanistan drastically in the second half of the 2006.
This presents WFP with a dreadful dilemma – which group of poor, hungry Afghans will have to suffer the cuts and the consequences?
Why is it always up to the United States to continue donating money over failed U.N. "peacekeeping and rebuilding causes"? If you look at your article again you will see many nations are in the business of contributing to the rebuilding of Afghan - but this country was in terrible conditions during and after the Cold War - write to Putin in Russia if you have real concerns.
You aren't even making sense here, preferring to call down people who are.
Why do you not offer something we can consider as viable and doable?
:lol: