Woman is the root cause of all of man’s and God’s woes.
- Thread starter French Patriot
- Start date
Yet the right keeps praying for the end of days so that they can be raptured away from us heathen that will be left for God to fry.
Have you not noted the right funding Israel and pushing them to rebuild the temple and bring on Armagedon?
Regards
DL
I think our continued opposition in opinion may be because perhaps we are not on the same planet. You living on earth?
I don't know if anyone has ever mentioned it to you, but God doesn't want to fry anyone. Do you think God is looking for a most wicked and unusually large frying pan to grill all of us on?
I think this is one of Satan's favorite ways to get his hooks into a person. He sells them the notion - "if god is god, then why all the evil" line. He is most proud when he convinces a human to charge God with evil. Satan marvels and delights when a human buys the lie and then the human imagines that he is more compassionate and loving than God. Thus putting himself above God in all things good and holy.
REASON is not holy or accurate. Run from REASON. It is is stone cold dead in the matters of faith. Rather! It kills faith and obscures the knowledge of God.
All this stuff I didn't know ( or care to )
Too soon old, and etc..............................
Too soon old, and etc..............................
Satan is most proud and pleased when humans recognize that a genocidal son murdering God is an evil prick.
Satan love truth.
Even he get's upset when people pray to a Hitler type and adore his type and want to see such, as a God, return to power.
Regards
DL
Wow, lots of food for thought.
[/QUOTE]
I have been absent attending to New Years and family and company so not been on here for a few days. But I cannot let this statement pass without correction and a big WOW?! how did you come up with this concept?
Please show us exact evidence of all these millions of babies wee born without a woman's cooperation and her body. No human has ever been formed, developed and BORN outside a woman's body. The incubation of the baby is totally dependent on a womans womb - a WHOLE woman, for a womb does not act on its own. In addition a womans body is required for the formation of a baby and her physical ability to "birth" said baby.
Ergo, forming and birthing a human baby does not exist WITHOUT a woman. And any attempts of scientists at trying to create and form a baby outside a womb has never succeeded even for 2 weeks in human or mammal forms. A fetus NEEDS a mother's body. Even at that the scenario of forming a baby outside a womb in a plastic sac is a sci-fi scary experiment.
So, Blackleaf You are incorrect and again, we prove that ONLY women birth all humans on earth. Yes, an ovum and sperm can become a viable new life if they are mixed in a petri dish - outside the sexual act between man and woman. However, I repeat, new life can also happen from a female dna and no sperm required. As evidenced by cloned mammals. No SPERM required, hence male not required to recreate life in mammal form on earth, which can be relative to humans.
Which in rules of elementary deductive reasoning: means GOD created woman in Gods image. God as both male and female or maybe God is two Gods or more. The adams rib story is more likely a womans rib dna which was reframed as a male fable when extreme patriarchal notions came into play.
Seeing as we know where babies come from, we can safely and accurately deduce that man comes from WOMAN, not the other way around and that is how God created how babies come to earth.
When you find that man who forms a baby inside his body and births a baby, then you will have a valid case, otherwise, you come from woman.
I have been absent attending to New Years and family and company so not been on here for a few days. But I cannot let this statement pass without correction and a big WOW?! how did you come up with this concept?
Please show us exact evidence of all these millions of babies wee born without a woman's cooperation and her body. No human has ever been formed, developed and BORN outside a woman's body. The incubation of the baby is totally dependent on a womans womb - a WHOLE woman, for a womb does not act on its own. In addition a womans body is required for the formation of a baby and her physical ability to "birth" said baby.
Ergo, forming and birthing a human baby does not exist WITHOUT a woman. And any attempts of scientists at trying to create and form a baby outside a womb has never succeeded even for 2 weeks in human or mammal forms. A fetus NEEDS a mother's body. Even at that the scenario of forming a baby outside a womb in a plastic sac is a sci-fi scary experiment.
So, Blackleaf You are incorrect and again, we prove that ONLY women birth all humans on earth. Yes, an ovum and sperm can become a viable new life if they are mixed in a petri dish - outside the sexual act between man and woman. However, I repeat, new life can also happen from a female dna and no sperm required. As evidenced by cloned mammals. No SPERM required, hence male not required to recreate life in mammal form on earth, which can be relative to humans.
Which in rules of elementary deductive reasoning: means GOD created woman in Gods image. God as both male and female or maybe God is two Gods or more. The adams rib story is more likely a womans rib dna which was reframed as a male fable when extreme patriarchal notions came into play.
Seeing as we know where babies come from, we can safely and accurately deduce that man comes from WOMAN, not the other way around and that is how God created how babies come to earth.
When you find that man who forms a baby inside his body and births a baby, then you will have a valid case, otherwise, you come from woman.
[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I am still not used to the format style of quoting and replying. This was meant to be a singular response to Blackleaf and his theory on women.
We can understand from the thread the need for a better definition of gods "image".
Why are the godless heathens allowed by the moderators to urinate all over this thread with their blasphemous posts which add nothing to the discussion? I think they should all have itchy things in their undergarments.
Why are the godless heathens allowed by the moderators to urinate all over this thread with their blasphemous posts which add nothing to the discussion? I think they should all have itchy things in their undergarments.
the image
The stars typed one of the elementary creations, of which there seem to have been three, the first being cosmic and universal, offering a sevenfold differentiation in primal substance; the second stellar and planetary; the third racial and individual in mankind. Much of the endless confusion in the interpretation of creation legends has arisen because of failure to distinguish which of these creations was being dealt with. What is fundamental, however, to all understanding is that all of nature’s cyclic processes are typical of each other. So that cosmogenesis adumbrates the planetary formation, which in turn is an enlarged picture of the anthropogenesis. As man was formed in the image and likeness of the Elohim, the seven-rayed creative Logoi, the septenary constitution pictured in the first and second creations appertains to him by reflection. All ancient philosophy referable to man was built upon the human constitution as a septenate of powers. We see the first creation in the hebdomadal formation of all physical creation; the second in the septenary solar systems; the third in the human formed of seven principles or natures. Of the first the Mother alone, the Virgin, Achamoth, Typhon, Apt, Nut, Neith, Isis, Hathor, Rerit,
Ishtar, Tiamat, Semiramis, Cybele and other primary feminine deities become the bearer and producer. Of the second Sevekh (Sebek, Seb), Saturn, and the Sun, as the leader of the seven Rishis, Archangels, Elohim, Kabiri, were the progenitors. Of the third the twelve legions of Asuras, Kumaras, Titans, Deva-Angels, Rudras, Adityas, who came collectively as Prometheus and Lucifer, individually as sons of the solar radiance, sons of Ra, or sparks of the divine fire, were the chief agents. They still supervise their continuing creation from their citadel deep within the shrine of man’s life. In one form or another, solar light, essence, power is centered in every manifestation. In the innermost sanctuary of life dwells the spark, the ray, the flame of solar glory. The sun is the central type and embodiment of the highest divinity. The Christs were all sun-gods.http://pc93.tripod.com/lostlght.htm
The stars typed one of the elementary creations, of which there seem to have been three, the first being cosmic and universal, offering a sevenfold differentiation in primal substance; the second stellar and planetary; the third racial and individual in mankind. Much of the endless confusion in the interpretation of creation legends has arisen because of failure to distinguish which of these creations was being dealt with. What is fundamental, however, to all understanding is that all of nature’s cyclic processes are typical of each other. So that cosmogenesis adumbrates the planetary formation, which in turn is an enlarged picture of the anthropogenesis. As man was formed in the image and likeness of the Elohim, the seven-rayed creative Logoi, the septenary constitution pictured in the first and second creations appertains to him by reflection. All ancient philosophy referable to man was built upon the human constitution as a septenate of powers. We see the first creation in the hebdomadal formation of all physical creation; the second in the septenary solar systems; the third in the human formed of seven principles or natures. Of the first the Mother alone, the Virgin, Achamoth, Typhon, Apt, Nut, Neith, Isis, Hathor, Rerit,
327
This still ultimately defines the concept that all men end up coming from women as individuals on earth. The god stuff of heavens, stars etc : fascinating how you inter-related the different theories and ancient myths. Nicely done.
But one must defer always to the story in Genesis and these posited theories as you have described some of them above: as just that: "theories" for no one really knows for sure. The ancients had to try to make sense of nature vs. God, and many from different parts of the world - most indigenous peoples end up with similar fable, myths of creation. Some more elaborate than others.
Many also have the theme of the virgin-mother and sacrificial son (which is as you mentioned related to sun worship). Which the ancients did discern that all life is impossible without the sun, so perhaps they have a small point. And the concept of "virgin mother" needs a further examination as to why the ancients exclude the male contribution in creating demi gods or gods or "Christs" as you put it. Is there some underlying ancient 1000's of years ago (or soul like) knowledge that women's cocreative abilities in cooperation with "God(s) was how all first humans came to be? again a debunking of adam and eve myth. Mind you we all see that god specifically says males are made in gods image, or reflection as well as women.
Which brings us to this day on earth: with our vast modern knowledge of science etc, our only true knowledge of how babies are formed and birthed.
Until experts can find corroborative skeletal evidence of males giving birth from the past - or if they find a current living male who has capacity to form and birth a baby: then we hold the truth to be: that human men (babies) come from women and that is how "God(s) created humans to come into being.
I do enjoy reading your findings.