Of course you do...you've failed to do anything but cut & paste. Most without crediting the author.
Why The Towers Fell
- Thread starter I think not
- Start date
- Status
I other words, you can't. Can you?
Thanx for trying though. Perhaps once you've moved into high school, you'll gain the much needed requirements of research, intellect and critical thought.
Thanx for coming out quandary.
i have done many times but your too stilted in your thoughts to listen
so are you saying you never went as you have none of the above
New Hollywood Film Hinting that 9/11 Was an Inside Job
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VIGU61m8AXQ
The film is called "The Reflecting pool."
http://reflectingpoolfilm.com/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1015468
a new film that infers that 9/11 was an insde job....??????
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VIGU61m8AXQ
The film is called "The Reflecting pool."
http://reflectingpoolfilm.com/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1015468
a new film that infers that 9/11 was an insde job....??????
How about all the rest of us stay out of this one and just sit back and watch the Bear and the Brit go at it? Just a suggestion...
Judging by the old saying, "What you don't know can't hurt you," he's practically invulnerable.
Did a half-wit gave you a piece of his mind, and you held on to it.i rest my case you have no case the only case you have is of your delusions pal ,get back on topic if you can
A 9/11 researcher, knowing that AA Flight 77 was a Boeing 757, noticed that AA’s website indicated that its 757s do not have passenger-seat phones. After he wrote to ask if that had been the case on September 11, 2001, an AA customer service representative replied: “That is correct; we do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on flight 77 used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist attack.”8
In response to this revelation, defenders of the official story might reply that Ted Olson was evidently right the first time: she had used her cell phone. However, besides the fact that this scenario is rendered unlikely by the cell phone technology employed in 2001, it has also been contradicted by the FBI.
The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.
Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10 And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.
This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8514
In response to this revelation, defenders of the official story might reply that Ted Olson was evidently right the first time: she had used her cell phone. However, besides the fact that this scenario is rendered unlikely by the cell phone technology employed in 2001, it has also been contradicted by the FBI.
The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.
Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10 And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.
This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8514
Really just because you fail to see why the whole thing was a set up,for the wars over oil don't show your ignorance ,by trying to be witty as your apparent ,foolishness shows how a warmongering idiot actually got to serve two terms in the white house. as he was probably voted in by apathetic twits like you and cndbear.....:angry3:
what to much proof for you, so you have to try too be funny to dismiss it, very poor cndbear ,but what I've come to expect from you .....I'm surprised you haven't put more of your pathetic smileys all over the place,to show how utterly fallacious you actually are over the entire subject.........
As promised via pm Quandary and CdnBear, this thread is now closed temporarily until you two either take it to the cage or cut it out altogether.
- Status