Depends on someone to grow food.
Ah- the illogic of the left!!!!!!!!!!!!
They hate Jordan Peterson because he points out character foibles that make the left ashamed of themselves!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here is an article illustrating just how screwed up and politically so called correct things are getting in Canada. With some comments of my own in brackets):
Wilfrid Laurier University apologizes to teaching assistant over reprimand
Canadian Press.Published: November 21, 2017. Updated: November 22, 2017 10:47 AM EST. Filed Under: Toronto SUN News/Canada
An Ontario university has apologized to a teaching assistant who was severely chastised for airing a clip of a debate featuring a controversial figure, saying the woman was not treated according to the institution’s values.
(HA! Oh yes- she WAS treated according to the values of the institution! The only reason for the apology was FEAR on the part of university staff who feared a major public backlash and loss of GRAVY!)
The president of Wilfrid Laurier University said the school is proceeding with a third-party investigation into the dispute with graduate student Lindsay Shepherd, but said recently revealed audio recordings of her interactions with her immediate superiors made it clear an apology was in order.
President says the “investigation” is proceeding? IN other words they ARE looking for a way to silence this woman without the bother of a public backlash against their reverse bigotry and grissw double standards!)
Shepherd said she discreetly recorded a meeting with three Laurier staff members in which she was roundly criticized for failing to condemn the views of polarizing University of Toronto professor Jordan Peterson, who has refused to use gender-neutral pronouns. She had aired a clip of a debate featuring the professor as part of a communications tutorial.
On the recording of the meeting, Shepherd is heard tearfully defending her decision to play the clip while staff accuse her of being transphobic and liken her failure to condemn Peterson to remaining neutral on the views of Adolf Hitler.
(OH right- using some made up title to refer to a person who is transitioning-making themselves UNRECOGIZABLE as either male or female- as the first and most vocal critic of Peterson has done is not quite in Nazi territory! Simply being referred to as Miss or Mr- WHILE YOU STILL HAVE ALL THE PROPER PARTS TO QUALIFY FOR THE LABEL is hardly genocide! That you are so unhappy with everything about your life and body is hardly the fault of others!)
“The conversation I heard does not reflect the values and practices to which Laurier aspires,” the university’s president, Deborah MacLatchy, said in a statement Tuesday. “I am sorry it occurred in the way that it did and I regret the impact it had on Lindsay Shepherd.”
Shepherd, 22, said she accepted and welcomed the apology, but felt it rang hollow coming on the heels of intensive media attention around her case.
(I say she heard that communication loud and clear- and fake!)
“Let’s not forget that this was their only option,” she said. “They were basically forced to do it out of public and media shaming.”
(Don’t forget fear of lost gravy!)
The saga began earlier this month when Shepherd led two tutorial groups of students taking a first-year communications course.
As part of a lesson on the complexities of grammar, Shepherd said she was trying to demonstrate that the structure of a language can impact the society in which its spoken in ways people might not anticipate.
To illustrate her point, she said she mentioned that long-standing views on gender had likely been shaped by the gender-specific pronouns that are part of English’s fundamental grammatical structure.
(Gender specific pronouns are part of MOST languages on this planet!)
The clip of Peterson debating sexual diversity scholar Nicholas Matte, she said, was meant to demonstrate ways in which the existence of gender-specific pronouns has caused controversy. A student complaint about the class prompted a meeting with supervisors.
(No- it is medical advancements that permit gender re-assignment that are putting up these problems for desperately unhappy people! And they are lashing out in their anger and frustration as it takes many years and much determination to reach a point where gender re-assignment is on offer- and this causes friction!)
In Shepherd’s recordings of her meeting with superiors, which she shared with The Canadian Press, she is heard arguing that she tried to present the situation neutrally in order to foster debate and discussion, and states that she herself does not support Peterson’s views on gender-neutral pronouns.
Shepherd’s supervisor Nathan Rambukkana is heard explicitly drawing parallels to white supremacist propaganda and is heard saying Shepherd should not have taken a neutral stance on the issue in class.
(IN other words- this student of”communications” is suffering from LIE-beral imposed thought control! LIE-berals do not want debate as they have long ago CLOSED THEIR MINDS to main stream Cdn views!)
In an open letter to Shepherd, Rambukkana apologized.
“While I still think that such material needs to be handled carefully, especially so as to not infringe on the rights of any of our students or make them feel unwelcome in the learning environment, I believe you are right that making a space for controversial or oppositional views is important, and even essential to a university,” he wrote in the letter.
“The trick is how to properly contextualize such material.”
(Yeah- is all a TRICK! A vile hypocrite one dreamed up by LIE-berals who are NOT comfortable with anything resembling free speach- that dissents from THEIR VIEW!)
Rambukkana also apologized for meeting with Shepherd in the company of two other colleagues, responding to criticism that such a setup demonstrated a power imbalance.
Shepherd argued, however, that Rambukkana’s caveat about contextualizing suggests Laurier is still opposed to hearing multiple perspectives on an issue, saying telling students what to think of any given opinion ahead of time cripples their capacity to form their own thoughts.
“It doesn’t matter how nicely you put it, it’s not OK to say that you can’t debate issues and you have to think a certain way,” she said.
(It certainly KILLS debate on any issue- which is of course EXACTLY what LIE-berals WANT! As an example- they are far more interested in discussing punishments for “Islamophobia” than they are in actually DEFINING it! If LIE-berals get their way- it looks like “Islamophobes” can look forward to being hauled into Human Rights- but too often Wrong Kangaroo courts- with the LIE-beral purpose being to intimidate into silence ANY critic of their many failed policies!)
In addition to the inquiry probing Shepherd’s case, MacLatchy said Laurier has also struck a task force looking at issues of academic freedom.
(Judging by the furor around U of T prof Jordan Peterson- the main interest of those concerned about “academic freedom” is finding the best way to channel and LIMIT it!)
“Laurier is committed to the abiding principles of freedom of speech and freedom of expression,” she said.
“Giving life to these principles while respecting fundamentally important human rights and our institutional values of diversity and inclusion, is not a simple matter. The intense media interest points to a highly polarizing and very complicated set of issues that is affecting universities across the democratic world.”