If we are talking about non-web-based clients, Outlook is the best.
If you got a good computer, and Microsoft Office `07, Outlook is very flawless, and is the best imo.
I use it for everything, and have a hotmail account for my other stuff.
Outlook is horrible. It's a piece of crap.If we are talking about non-web-based clients, Outlook is the best.
If you got a good computer, and Microsoft Office `07, Outlook is very flawless, and is the best imo.
I use it for everything, and have a hotmail account for my other stuff.
The ability to copy/move mailboxes is kludgy, slow, and not straightforward. The way it handles attachments is kludgy, slow, and painful. The way it handles archiving is kludgy, slow, and not straighforward. The way it handles subfolders, filing of attachments, and general organization is kludgy, slow, and not straightforward.Why is Outlook awful. Examples please
And TenPenny, I have been noticing you make alot of statements but never back them up with anything until your asked, not very good format for forum debates.