USS Roosevelt Visits the UK. Brits In Awe

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,713
7,147
113
Washington DC
OK, now that Blackleaf has proven so comprehensively that he doesn't know what a "blue-water navy" is any more than he knows what the word "decimate" means, what's next?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
OK, now that Blackleaf has proven so comprehensively that he doesn't know what a "blue-water navy" is any more than he knows what the word "decimate" means, what's next?

And that these other blue water navies were designated as such by the brits themselves... for what it is worth.

It doesn't have more power than that Type 45 escorting it, which is the most powerful destroyer and most advanced warship on the planet.

And when they put to sea with a US Fleet the US Admiral sticks them on Port Quarter watch.



The RN has a global presence and has had a global presence since before the USN was even invented.

Look up T-Bones word... "decimated"

did they bring their own escort ships with it as we dont have any of those to spare either.this might become a permanant solution to britains defence until the americans get fed up of funding our defence ~ realist, Cardiff




The Russian Navy does not possess a true global presence like the RN. Russian ships usually don't tend to venture too far from Russia.

The Royal Navy also has hunter-killer submarines circling the globe.

You're a bigger fool than I thought if you think the Russians aren't out there. They are doing donuts off your coast.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,451
1,668
113
OK, now that Blackleaf has proven so comprehensively that he doesn't know what a "blue-water navy" is any more than he knows what the word "decimate" means, what's next?


A blue water navy is something which the Chinese and Russians don't have. Or, if they have, they still do not possess the capabilities that the Royal Navy has.

And it's not just the navy. Russia and China may possess larger militaries as a whole than Britain (but they have much larger populations) but their militaries as a whole still do not possess the capabilities and the strength of the British military.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Decimated... diminished

In my time, we had a proper Navy. Now, it diminishes on a daily basis.
~ Retired Navy, Merseyside

Within my lifetime we had an Army, Navy and Air Force worthy of the names. Now they are but shadows of they're former selves. But we have a Benefits bill that other countries are very envious of; only kidding. What a pathetic state this country has been reduced to.~ MPV, Portsmouth

In need of protection...

I think this is a response to Putin's recent 'sabre rattling' by sending Russian planes and ships close to our shores recently. The USA is showing that we have 'back up' if needed!~ Kate, Knottingley

Even Kate knows. lol










 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,451
1,668
113
And that these other blue water navies were designated as such by the brits themselves... for what it is worth.

Russia and China do not possess the global military reach that the UK possesses, not just in naval terms but in total military terms full stop. Now let that be the end of the matter.

And when they put to sea with a US Fleet the US Admiral sticks them on Port Quarter watch.
Do the Yanks REALLY allow Russian and Chinese warships to sail with a US fleet?

Look up T-Bones word... "decimated"
I have listened to anything T-Bone steak has said for years now.


You're a bigger fool than I thought if you think the Russians aren't out there. They are doing donuts off your coast.
And you're an even bigger fool if you think the Russian Navy has a global military footprint, when it most clearly hasn't. They might be able to send a few of their rusting hulks into the English Channel but, when you look on a map (which would be something for a Yank), Britain isn't really that far away from Russia.
 

gore0bsessed

Time Out
Oct 23, 2011
2,414
0
36
good thread for a laugh at blackleaf, but otherwise drooling mindless jingoism by regular citizenry unable to connect the irony of praising an inane budget for "defense" which directly impacts their own standard of living.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Russia and China do not possess the global military reach that the UK possesses, not just in naval terms but in total military terms full stop. Now let that be the end of the matter.

They are blue water navies and they are growing.

meanwhile we have not got one.....and no reconnasance nimrods...and harriers.....all gone.for scrap... and a micky mouse army after redundances..and more cuts every year..while RUSSIA grows stronger every day along with ISIS....We are a nation led by fools who risk our lives and freedom to save money.....then give it away to dictators in foriegn aid..~ Roy, Cheshire



Meanwhile you have computer drawings. You're lucky you have us to defend you.

psst... this is a real photo. ;)



Do the Yanks REALLY allow Russian and Chinese warships to sail with a US fleet?

da faq?

I have listened to anything T-Bone steak has said years now.

I am sure he appreciates your attention.


And you're an even bigger fool if you think the Russian Navy has a global military footprint, when it most clearly hasn't. They might be able to send a few of their rusting hulks into the English Channel but, when you look on a map (which would be something for a Yank), Britain isn't really that far away from Russia.

They send them and your nation shudders.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
I feel like I'm watching a prize fight and ES is scoring with repeated roundhouse bombs. BL is on the ropes and the doctor should step in.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
good thread for a laugh at blackleaf, but otherwise drooling mindless jingoism by regular citizenry unable to connect the irony of praising an inane budget for "defense" which directly impacts their own standard of living.
As long as there is enough left over for your welfare check......what do you care?
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,451
1,668
113
They are blue water navies

Well I wouldn't say they are. They're still way behind the RN for capability and do not have a global reach.


Meanwhile you have computer drawings.
That's because we're building loads of hi-tech, powerful new ships for the greatest navy on Earth.


This is an English-speaking website. Now I would very much appreciate it if you could converse in that medium.


I am sure he appreciates your attention.
I don't give two hoots either way.



They send them and your nation shudders.
The British are a warrior race. It takes a lot to make us shudder.

I feel like I'm watching a prize fight and ES is scoring with repeated roundhouse bombs. BL is on the ropes and the doctor should step in.


I think I've won this argument long ago.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,713
7,147
113
Washington DC
Well I wouldn't say they are. They're still way behind the RN for capability and do not have a global reach.
From this we deduce that Blackleaf's definition of "blue-water navy" is "equal or superior to the Royal Navy in capability and reach."

This is an English-speaking website. Now I would very much appreciate it if you could converse in that medium.
English isn't a medium. It's a language.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,451
1,668
113
From this we deduce that Blackleaf's definition of "blue-water navy" is "equal or superior to the Royal Navy in capability and reach."

English isn't a medium. It's a language.


A blue-water navy is the United States Navy and the Royal Navy and, probably, the French Navy.

Most experts would not consider any other navy to be a true blue-water navy. The spud-munching Russkies and the slitty-eyed, jaundiced Chinkies have regional, localised navies. They do not have global, blue-water navies like the RN.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,713
7,147
113
Washington DC
A blue-water navy is the United States Navy and the Royal Navy and, probably, the French Navy.

Most experts would not consider any other navy to be a true blue-water navy. The spud-munching Russkies and the slitty-eyed, jaundiced Chinkies have regional, localised navies. They do not have global, blue-water navies like the RN.
Have you consulted most experts?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Well I wouldn't say they are. They're still way behind the RN for capability and do not have a global reach.


That's because we're building loads of hi-tech, powerful new ships for the greatest navy on Earth.


This is an English-speaking website. Now I would very much appreciate it if you could converse in that medium.


I don't give two hoots either way.



The British are a warrior race. It takes a lot to make us shudder.




I think I've won this argument long ago.
Au Canada on est bilingue mon ami.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Well I wouldn't say they are. They're still way behind the RN for capability and do not have a global reach.

Of course YOU wouldn't. You have very little knowledge on military matters.


The British are a warrior race. It takes a lot to make us shudder.

I can't recall many countries that invited Germans in to conquer then rule them. Even the French put up some resistance.

Its not going to be travelling around the world empty is it..lol Thats what its for. They are all on deck because obviously they are on standby mode, with the Russians doing their threatening flyovers. Wont be many of those this week i wouldn't imagine..lol~ George, London



I think I've won this argument long ago.

You'd be wrong again to think that. People are getting a kick out of you embarrassing yourself.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,451
1,668
113
Of course YOU wouldn't. You have very little knowledge on military matters.

It appears I know more than you do, still coming on here trying to tell me that the Chinese and Russian navies have a greater global reach than the Royal Navy.

I can't recall many countries that invited Germans in to conquer then rule them. Even the French put up some resistance.
The French were invaded by the Hun three times in 70 years. The British haven't been successfully invaded since 1066.

You'd be wrong again to think that. People are getting a kick out of you embarrassing yourself.

No. I won this argument in this silly, pointless thread about 48 hours ago.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
It appears I know more than you do, still coming on here trying to tell me that the Chinese and Russian navies have a greater global reach than the Royal Navy.

Lying will not help you.

This is what YOU said.

The Royal Navy is the only true Blue Water navy on the planet other than the United States Navy .

And you were wrong.

China and Russia have blue water navies. You lose and moving the goal posts will not help.


No. I won this argument in this silly, pointless thread about 48 hours ago.
Don't be such a fool. Look at all the comments and look at all your floundering.


More aircraft on one ship than the Royal Air Force have, including paper ones!~ Gray, Oxford


Look,useless 'English' Government....an aircraft carrier living up to it's job description,carrying PLANES!!!(and the Numpties in Scotland voted 'No'?).~ William, Beith