That was tongue in cheek..........Pardon him for what? He was acquitted
That was tongue in cheek..........Pardon him for what? He was acquitted
haha That's true but only in spinspeak. Another two or three decades of practise at spinspeak and you might make a decent conman.Oh OK, not guilty can be found guilty if the prosecution is unable to prove you guilty, gotcha, carry on
"spin speak". Good one.haha That's true but only in spinspeak. Another two or three decades of practise at spinspeak and you might make a decent conman.
Oh OK, not guilty can be found guilty if the prosecution is unable to prove you guilty, gotcha, carry on
Indeed.That case was racially charged as well. He killed a black kid who was carrying a bag of skittles. Zimmerman is an arrogant prick. (and that is being polite) Trump Would Probably pardon him.
TDS is alive and well in the MSM and their Democrat family .And it is not a surprise that the White Liberal Elite in the US and Libs here in CanCon are falling over themselves for such a racist like Bloomberg.
Don’t forget homophobic .And it is not a surprise that the White Liberal Elite in the US and Libs here in CanCon are falling over themselves for such a racist like Bloomberg.
Accusation is enough , if it helps my political position .I don't know much about the case, but acquitted usually means not guilty, no matter how much one wants to say an indictment means guilty.
So he is guilty or not?Oh but you are swimming in murky waters, an acquittal does not mean innocent, it simply means that the prosecution failed to prove guilt:
https://www.nealdavislaw.com/blog/criminal-defense/acquittal-vs-not-guilty
"Essentially, a verdict of not guilty is an acquittal. If a jury or judge finds you not guilty of a criminal charge, you are acquitted and your case is closed. If you’re found guilty of a charge, you are said to be convicted and must face the penalties imposed for the crime, though you have the option to appeal. In this way, a conviction is the opposite of an acquittal.
But an acquittal doesn’t mean the jury or judge found you innocent of the charge. It only means that the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were guilty."
Yes we are all unconvicted members of society .Holy convoluted sentence Batman! That is some pretty fancy footwork. I'll untangle that for ya. Not guilty does not mean innocent.
Yes.... I heard that today. The "pardon" would be contingent on Assange saying that Russia did not influence the US election. sounds plausible...........but who knows in that murky world of the Trump-swamp. The white house "flatley denes that".............which doesn't mean anything. It is bad enough that he lies........but he expects others to lie for him too.Na, Trump wouldn't have given him a pardon if he had been convicted. Zimmerman has nothing to offer in return.
Now Julian Assange on the other hand, now HE has something Trump would like. Did Trump offer him a pardon? The rumor mill is churning:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51566470
Yes.... I heard that today. The "pardon" would be contingent on Assange saying that Russia did not influence the US election. sounds plausible...........but who knows in that murky world of the Trump-swamp. The white house "flatley denes that".............which doesn't mean anything. It is bad enough that he lies........but he expects others to lie for him too.
The smoking gun ? Bombshell expose ? Stay tuned for future developments . How were the Democrat debates tonight ? Anybody watch ?Yeah and of course Trump denies even knowing the congressman, Dana Rohrabacher who (rumor has it) took the offer to Assange's lawyers. Another who Trump claims he doesn't know:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisett...lian-assange-makes-pardon-claim/#2315d7ff69fc
Previous news reports, however, place Rohrabacher (who reportedly holds pro-Russian views) and Trump together in a 2017, 45 minute-long White House meeting also attended by former chief of staff Reince Priebus and former chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Isn't it amazing how many people that Trump"conveniently" does not know...........until it is proven otherwise by some enterprising reporter.?? Between you and me....his BS and lies are getting more than tiresome. If his lips are moving ....he is lying. or he is firing some poor schmuck.Yeah and of course Trump denies even knowing the congressman, Dana Rohrabacher who (rumor has it) took the offer to Assange's lawyers. Another who Trump claims he doesn't know:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisett...lian-assange-makes-pardon-claim/#2315d7ff69fc
Previous news reports, however, place Rohrabacher (who reportedly holds pro-Russian views) and Trump together in a 2017, 45 minute-long White House meeting also attended by former chief of staff Reince Priebus and former chief strategist Steve Bannon.
The smoking gun ? Bombshell expose ? Stay tuned for future developments . How were the Democrat debates tonight ? Anybody watch ?
Isn't it amazing how many people that Trump"conveniently" does not know...........until it is proven otherwise by some enterprising reporter.?? Between you and me....his BS and lies are getting more than tiresome. If his lips are moving ....he is lying. or he is firing some poor schmuck.
Trump won .Again, no I didn't watch, did you? You seem to have more interest in it than I have. How was it?