United Nations

[Jersay]

All the time.

 

[I think not]

Then the article you posted has no meaning.

 

[Jersay]

Yes it does have meaning.

Because even though the United States and the United nations and France and other Western, and African and Third-World nations choose one of the two ways.

They choose the damned way that was easy that was good for the time.

They should have choosen the damned way that was morally correct to do.

 

[Jersay]

Oh yeah i am going to do a seperate thread on the Rwandan genocide so Juan and Johnny can battle it out. :wink:

This will remain for the U.n

 

[Jersay]

Re: RE: United Nations

Juan, I would suggest that there will be temporary TEAMS
that ally for a singular purpose when the UN does
not achieve the CRITICAL MASS it needs for authority.

And I would suggest that the other of the nations
in the world do take the lead on Sudan, beyond just
sending 200 Canadian soldiers.

Other nations can cry all they want about the lack
of American power to settle the Dafur ethnic cleansing.

But the sad truth is that the West desires little to
shed its sons and daughters to stop the Dafur slaughter,
as they comfortably hold on to their precious morality
condemning America for not taking the matter in hand
and finishing it.

You might be right Jimmoyer about that. I don't see why the West needs the U.S. to go into Sudan.