Can America trust a man that can’t even satisfy a Woman , those are your words .He is not gay.
Can America trust a man that can’t even satisfy a Woman , those are your words .He is not gay.
I would think most people love their grandchildren, don’t you think ?Sometimes we ahve to look at the background of the person, to see how competent they are.
Peter Navarro could not even win a seat as a city councilor in San Diego. He tried 5 times in 5 districts. His campaign managers said he had a Messiah complex, and was the "biggest asshole we ever worked for." This would explain why he is such an insufferable asshole today, and repeatedly tries to discredit Dr.Fauci, who is a family man and loves his Grandchildren.
Yes Libya is a fine example . Iraq is another . How about Afghanistan?Sometimes countries have to send troops to regions of the World to neutralize warlords that try to destabilize regions.
Trump should have strengthened ties with the EU, so that he could stand up to Putin, and his interference in Belarus.
But have the problems in the mentioned areas disappeared ? Reasons or not have those countries stabilized ?Afghanistan was 100% justified due to Al Qaeda and the attacks on America. To suggest military action against Afghanistan was unnecessary, is ridiculous.
The Iraq invasion turned out to be a mistake due to false information of the country harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction.
What about Yugoslavia? A ruthless Serbian war criminal committing genocide against the Bosnian people? Was that a mistake?
Libya was most likely justifiable.
Afghanistan was also a NATO-approved operation. NATO invoked Article 5.Afghanistan was 100% justified due to Al Qaeda and the attacks on America. To suggest military action against Afghanistan was unnecessary, is ridiculous.
The Iraq invasion turned out to be a mistake due to false information of the country harbouring Weapons of Mass Destruction.
What about Yugoslavia? A ruthless Serbian war criminal committing genocide against the Bosnian people? Was that a mistake?
Libya was most likely justifiable.
Yet Bin Laden was found in Pakistan , should we be at war with them ? What I would have done is of no matter , it is the outcome , if those wars were started to bring peace and stability to the region they were abject failures despite the good intentions . Regardless no new wars so far during Trump’s administration .What would you have done about Afghanistan, knowing that the Taliban was harboring Osama Bin Laden and the leaders of Al Qaeda? Should America have just ignored them?
Yea did NATO bring peace and stability to the region ? Who is the dominant member of NATO ? Do they call the shots ?Afghanistan was also a NATO-approved operation. NATO invoked Article 5.
pgs doesn't understand the difference between a casus belli and an outcome.
That'd be because he's stupid.
Yes we all know you are omnipotent.Afghanistan was also a NATO-approved operation. NATO invoked Article 5.
pgs doesn't understand the difference between a casus belli and an outcome.
That'd be because he's stupid.
Nope, just know what I'm talking about.Yes we all know you are omnipotent.
Thanks for the compliment .Nope, just know what I'm talking about.
That makes one of us.
Yes that area of the world is all black and white no grey areas at all .It achieved it's purpose. Since 1996, the Taliban had been openly harboring Al Qaeda, a group intent on destroying the America, at any means possible. 9/11 would have never been possible without the Taliban giving Bin Laden a base to train his insurgents.
However, lets just do nothing, and turn the other cheek. I'm sure that would have gone over very well with the American public.
PS...Pakistan cooperated with America. So why go to war with them?
PPS...what are your thoughts on American intervention in World War II?
Senate agrees with Mueller, there was no Russian collusion.Trump's 2016 campaign was eager to accept help from a foreign power, bipartisan Senate report finds
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...ger-accept-help-n1237002?cid=eml_nbn_20200818