Fuk BC, run the line to NS for domestic use and possible exports. BC can go back to chopping wood.
Good luck with that the Micki Mucks are making things impossible there too
Fuk BC, run the line to NS for domestic use and possible exports. BC can go back to chopping wood.
That's not a question. That's a fact. Pipelines have the lowest spill per liter transported rate of any of the transportation methods.The question is also whether oil tankers are safer than pipelines and\or railroads
Considering most of my views are on the moderate side your score might not to be something to be cheering about. Think of the rest of mt reply as as, 'Getting to know the inner me.' to see if the agreement remains a singular thing.========================================================================================================
WHY..............MHz................................I agree with you for once!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I was getting at BC opening up a 2nd shipping port with inroads to the interior as the southern route is about maxed out so any growth means less goods make it to the interior.I too would like to see B.C. shut off and denied oil for a while!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Plastic pellets should not be classified as a 'dangerous good' as a spill is easy to clean up. Pipelines probably have fewer accidents per year than airlines.The resulting dose of reality might sober them up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They are putting a bottleneck in their own revenue stream. The PM could declare it to be a national emergency and then the army puts it's through. They are not known for their environmental concerns.But that shut off will NEVER HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There is your first blatant piece of false information. The business with them is through subsidiaries of the sane oil companies that do business in Canada. We buy from other places to prop up those companies, the US does the same thing. The 'special coal' they import and burn is the same thing rather than they need that coal to burn cleanly. That ash is just as toxic. Bag it up in plastic and drop it in a trench in the ocean.For one thing Our idiot Boy Justin is such a dedicated SOVIET style socialist that he is prepared to seriously compromise our economy just so he can help the socialist economic basket case Venezuela by making sure we keep buying from them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PM Martin and PM Harper were big on the Canadian Government doing what is right as it fits the plans of big biz. What it did or didn't do to the Canadian economy was not on the list of 'important things'. You are cluing in that we are getting screwed, you are under the illusion there is a direction we can turn where that doesn't happen.In addition Our idiot Boy HATES YANKEES so badly that he is willing to risk destroying our economy by screwing up NAFTA negotiations with his anti Yankee bigotry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Canada is a backwater subsidiary of the US. Too poor without the natural resources to be worth long term development. People within a few hundred miles of the border go south when given the chance, Canada is to the north.Our idiot Boy is so anti Yankee that he would rather destroy our economy than allow Yankee oil companies to profit from the Cdn oil patch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As pointed out above, he is just a cog in a wheel that is turned by others. His sandbox company (Coalas) did not decide where the roads went but they still got all the best contracts and will for some time to come.It is for the above reasons that Our idiot Boy WILL NEVER ALLOW Kinder Morgan pipeline to be built!!!!!!!!!!
Round IIAs I have said before- NO pipelines will be built in Canada until we have a NEW GOVT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The center of the world is Jerusalem rather than Ottawa. Back to square one for you Buddy. 'How to be a good little Injun 191'LIE-berals are DELIBERATELY STALLING and using all manner of "consultation and research" crap to ensure nothing happens till after the 2019 election!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oil Companies don't build during the low prices that come in a 'glut'. Why make a tiny profit when you can make a huge one??If LIE-berals win the 2019 election then Kinder Morgan IS DEAD- FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bankers like people who run that up at an insane level, not so much for the ones that even hint at bringing it down. Ask JFK, oh wait they killed him because he was going to do just that. Last Politician with a pair of balls apparently. (Libya in the Mid-east)If LIE-berals lose the 2019 election then Kinder Morgan will go ahead- and it will eventually send a badly needed flow of cash to Ottawa to pay down some of the HUGE DEBTS run up by INSANE LIE-berals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't bet the farm on it.Reality is that Kinder Morgan MUST be built so we can pay back the crippling LIE-beral debts!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hemp, putting in in big letter won't helpyou see that is the direction that brings in more than oil ever has and ever will. The US just made it legal watch them jump on the train and Canada is left standing at the Station, . . . again.Only oil sales can provide the kind of tax revenue that can get us out of the LIE-beral debt hole- we have nothing else for sale that is half as profitable as oil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm impressed, you take up heroin as your 'Sherlock button' seems to have been working for a moment.In addition- allowing Yankees to continue being involved in the Cdn oil patch would probably do a lot to make it easier to renegotiate NAFTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You say that like the US isn't also just another puppet made in our image.Yankees see clearly that Our idiot Boy and his LIE-beral minions want to shove Yankees OUT of our oil patch - regardless of the economic damage done!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Really? Perhaps making simple tasks as difficult and as expensive as possible is part of 'their charm' rather than they 'keep at no matter how difficult the task'. Let's hope they don't start believing it.And as always- Yankees are DISGUSTED with LIE-beral indifference to national security issues that WILL AFFECT BOTH COUNTRIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Rez would be a good location for a Pirate Web Site.AS for natives- both natives and LIE-berals are counting on Fake News and Censorship to keep critics at bay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The one with the highest paid infiltrators. The look at who is the most vocal at Indian Affairs and waterboard both and you will have the mole.Neither LIE-berals NOR their tame media pals have specified WHICH native groups are being most loud in their protests of the pipeline!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why don't you have the answer ready for them as they sound a bit 'slack' at best?We should ask WHICH native groups have signed on for Kinder Morgan and which HAVE NOT?????????????
The Oil Companies have left them enough poisoned lakes that they have justification to be suspicious.They are naive if they think words on a contract means anything to them.And we should ask HOW FAR AWAY some of these objectors actually live from the pipeline route?????????
Perhaps the 'win' is big oil showing thel lost a contract thet thought they would get. Why build a pipeline to nowhere?Too many native groups- and other Cdns in B.C. who too often do not live anywhere near the pipeline route, regard pipeline protests as a FINE WAY to BLACKMAIL govt into giving them money for NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who doesn't in that line of work, at least Lawyers don't openly beg in public.And since Our idiot Boy is a typical LIE-beral- he is DESPERATE to buy votes at ANY price so he can cling to power!!!!!!!!!!!!
The list is almost endless, each governments inherits the one the losing side had. The list is never meant to get any shorter.Hence this LIE-beral stalling on the pipeline- its NOT about the environment- any more than the carbon tax grab is about the environment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
. . . and then some.Its all smoke and mirrors designed to make shameless LIE-beral vote buying look a little less loathsome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don”t forget Neptune Coal Terminal . Or the sulphuric shipped out of North Shore Terminals and Port MoodeyLNG...
Would the entirety of Howe Sound need to be evacuated if an oil tanker leaked like if an LNG tanker leaked?
Potash...
How about a potash bulker and their daily trips in and out? What would happen to Barnet and Burrard inlets if one of those puppies sank?
The hypocrisy is mind blowing.
fewer spills but greater impact?That's not a question. That's a fact. Pipelines have the lowest spill per liter transported rate of any of the transportation methods.
Does it disappear in the atmosphere ? Would that not create more atmospheric gases?btw LNG will not mix with water. It will evaporate into the atmosphere, unlike oil, which needs to be physically removed from the water or the beach or the creature.
Even a really stupid person should get that.
Squamish
The same ones partnered in Woodfibre LNG.
here is his statement:Does it disappear in the atmosphere ? Would that not create more atmospheric gases?
No. Do you know where Howe Sound is ?here is his statement:
Would the entirety of Howe Sound need to be evacuated if an oil tanker leaked like if an LNG tanker leaked.
No. Do you know where Howe Sound is ?
Well tankers from Burrard Inlet would be turning away from Howe Sound heading south toward Juan de Fuca .Do questions like that deserve an answer?
Well tankers from Burrard Inlet would be turning away from Howe Sound heading south toward Juan de Fuca .
here is his statement:
Would the entirety of Howe Sound need to be evacuated if an oil tanker leaked like if an LNG tanker leaked.
OTTAWA—Who’s better at building pipelines?
That question has become a major point of contention for federal Liberals and Conservatives, as the expansion of the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline is stalled and the political parties enter prolonged campaign mode ahead of next year’s general election.
Team Trudeau points to the record of pipeline construction when Stephen Harper was prime minister. They say the Conservatives failed to pave the way for new pipelines to all-important markets overseas, where higher prices are available for Canadian oil. The Tories fire back that the Liberals are botching the approval of new resource projects and contend the climate for construction was better when they were in charge.
Witness this statement from the office of Natural Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi this week: “The previous government cut corners at every turn. They disregarded environmental concerns and they ignored Indigenous peoples. The result — not a single kilometre of pipeline built to overseas markets.”
Now listen to Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer, who spoke to reporters that very same day: “The facts speak for themselves,” he said. “Our previous government completed four major pipeline projects during our nine years in office, including two that included access to tidewater.”
OK, then. What should we make of that?
Martin King is an analyst in Calgary with the firm GMP FirstEnergy. He brushed both claims off as arguably correct, though ultimately misguided.
“Both right, both wrong — and they’re arguing about the wrong thing,” King said.
First off, it’s true that four pipelines were built when Harper was prime minister. The two with “access to tidewater” are the Trans Canada Keystone line and Anchor Loop expansion.
King said it’s technically true that oil flowing through the Keystone line may ultimately end up at an ocean. That pipeline, which began pumping oil in 2010, runs from Hardisty, Alta. to Steele City in Nebraska. From there, oil can be shipped through a connecting line to Oklahoma, and then into a third pipeline to the Gulf Coast.
“In the truest sense, there is access to tidewater,” King said, although it is by no means a direct connection.
A similar case can be made for the Anchor Loop. That line was built in 2008 as a way to pump more Alberta oil through the Trans Mountain pipeline, the decades-old transmitter that runs from outside Edmonton to Burnaby, B.C. The Anchor Loop is a second pipeline installed next to the old one, which runs 158 kilometres from Hinton, Alta. to just west of Mount Robson in the Rockies.
So, while the Anchor Loop itself doesn’t go to the coast, it allows the broader Trans Mountain system to carry more oil to tidewater, bumping its capacity from 260,000 barrels of oil per day to the current 300,000.
But King said the Liberal case — that no pipelines were built to overseas markets — is buttressed by the fact that no major direct link from the oilsands to the ocean was constructed when Harper was in office.
“A direct Canadian link of large capacity to tidewater? No that is not the case,” he said.
That said, King and others dismiss this discussion as little more than a partisan squabble.
They say the real issue is that Canada doesn’t have enough pipeline capacity for the amount of oil it produces. That forces companies that dredge oil in Alberta to sell it to receivers on the other end of pipelines at a discount. They essentially have to bid on limited transit space by lowering their prices, King said.
Todd Crawford, associate director of industrial economic trends at the Conference Board of Canada, said Canadian crude is currently sold at roughly $40 per barrel cheaper than in U.S. jurisdictions that don’t have the same capacity problems.
He said the new pipelines that Scheer boasts about had a “positive impact” on this problem, but the progress was marginal considering that major Canadian pipeline proposals in recent years — Energy East, Northern Gateway and the Trans Mountain expansion project — have been abandoned or stalled.
“There’s no other honest way to characterize it: both major parties wear this,” he said.
Canadian Chamber of Commerce president Perrin Beatty said companies in Canada increasingly feel the system used to assess proposed projects like pipelines is “badly broken.” Projects languish under a cloud of uncertainty, and successive governments have been found by courts to have failed in their environmental assessments and consultations with Indigenous peoples, he said — most recently on Aug. 30, when a federal court quashed the Trans Mountain expansion approval.
The big question for Beatty is how can the government give businesses clarity on which projects are acceptable and which are not, especially in light of opposition to industries that contribute to climate change. It may be time to openly debate whether Canada wants new oil pipelines at all, he said.
“Lots of blame to go around,” he said, referring to stalled pipelines under Conservative and Liberal watch. “We seem incapable of getting it done.”
So who’s better at building pipelines?
It seems neither party’s record is very good — at least on the major pipeline projects.
But they sure want you to think their opponent is worse.
Liberals and Conservatives bicker over who’s the bigger pipeline champion
Very good article