I'm surprised you haven't brought up Somalia, where giving vaccinations has actually killed a bunch of kids.
It's all part of the big pharma plan, of course.
It's all part of the big pharma plan, of course.
Somehow I don't think you are not all that hard to fool. But let's just do a little test.
How many of these phenomena do you believe in?
1. Law of gravity
2. Nuclear physics
3. Ohm's Law
4. Archimedes Law
5. Avogadro's Law
6. Fermi Pardox
I could go on at length with with list, but I hope it is not necessary. Instead I will refer to a link listing scientific laws. Of course, in your confused set of semi-religious beliefs you are free to refuse to believe in any of them. However, perhaps you should take a good look the others in CC who agree with you. When you have obviously confused individuals like Bonehead supporting you, then perhaps you should consider revising your thinking, provided you are capable of intelligent thought.List of scientific laws named after people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ki/List_of_scientific_laws_named_after_people
Somehow I don't think you are not all that hard to fool. But let's just do a little test.
How many of these phenomena do you believe in?
1. Law of gravity
2. Nuclear physics
3. Ohm's Law
4. Archimedes Law
5. Avogadro's Law
6. Fermi Pardox
I could go on at length with with list, but I hope it is not necessary. Instead I will refer to a link listing scientific laws. Of course, in your confused set of semi-religious beliefs you are free to refuse to believe in any of them. However, perhaps you should take a good look the others in CC who agree with you. When you have obviously confused individuals like Bonehead supporting you, then perhaps you should consider revising your thinking, provided you are capable of intelligent thought.List of scientific laws named after people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ki/List_of_scientific_laws_named_after_people
That's interesting, in other exchanges you've claimed to be a scientist. It might help your credibility a little if you could spell your job title correctly. It was of course perfectly obvious that you're not a scientist, anybody who buys the electric cosmos hypothesis or thinks Velikovsky was on to something important and useful has no real understanding of science at all. I suggest you're not in a strong position to argue about the science that underlies vaccination. You have no understanding of what science is, what it claims, and how it works. And it DOES work, you're surrounded by products of its insights. If science was as fundamentally wrong as you claim it is, none of the electronic devices in your life would work, they depend on the results of quantum theory, and GPS systems would be uselessly inaccurate, their accuracy depends on the results of general relativity. If the electric cosmos hypothesis had any merit even so simple a device as a compass could tell you nothing useful. You don't know what you're talking about.I am a certified industrial machanic...
Like my other brother Bar, no, I don't get it either. That image suggests there's a causal connection between vaccination and all those other medical issues, and the data do not sustain that claim. Maybe you could do a little research on infant and child mortality before and after the advent of vaccination. My grandparents were the first generation in history that could routinely expect all their children to survive to adulthood.
And perhaps not all are supposed to survive. I am of the mind set that nature cannot be tamed or bent to our whims. There is imbalance in the world and much of it is caused by human ego. We are no more important than any other life form and I have grave doubts about our claims to intelligence and the epitome of evolutionary superiority. Our immune system is designed to take care of itself and vaccines are an unnatural process of intervention that weakens our immune system's ability to regulate itself. I won't get into the fact the Big Phama is profit based and therefore not really concerned with anything but creating customers. We are a society that has sterilized itself too death. We need more dirt in our lives not more sterility.T
Like my other brother Bar, no, I don't get it either. That image suggests there's a causal connection between vaccination and all those other medical issues, and the data do not sustain that claim. Maybe you could do a little research on infant and child mortality before and after the advent of vaccination. My grandparents were the first generation in history that could routinely expect all their children to survive to adulthood.
Somehow I don't think you are not all that hard to fool. But let's just do a little test.
How many of these phenomena do you believe in?
1. Law of gravity
2. Nuclear physics
3. Ohm's Law
4. Archimedes Law
5. Avogadro's Law
6. Fermi Pardox
I could go on at length with with list, but I hope it is not necessary. Instead I will refer to a link listing scientific laws. Of course, in your confused set of semi-religious beliefs you are free to refuse to believe in any of them. However, perhaps you should take a good look the others in CC who agree with you. When you have obviously confused individuals like Bonehead supporting you, then perhaps you should consider revising your thinking, provided you are capable of intelligent thought.List of scientific laws named after people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ki/List_of_scientific_laws_named_after_people
(Thinks WAPO is a scientific source!...^)No. And no thinking individual does either. Don't tell me you've fallen for the anti-vaxer psuedo-science.
At one time everyone knew the world was flat. At one time everyone knew that Earth is the center of the universe. Get the idea yet?
(Thinks WAPO is a scientific source!...^)
You don't do "peer review" very well do you?
That's interesting, in other exchanges you've claimed to be a scientist. It might help your credibility a little if you could spell your job title correctly. It was of course perfectly obvious that you're not a scientist, anybody who buys the electric cosmos hypothesis or thinks Velikovsky was on to something important and useful has no real understanding of science at all. I suggest you're not in a strong position to argue about the science that underlies vaccination. You have no understanding of what science is, what it claims, and how it works. And it DOES work, you're surrounded by products of its insights. If science was as fundamentally wrong as you claim it is, none of the electronic devices in your life would work, they depend on the results of quantum theory, and GPS systems would be uselessly inaccurate, their accuracy depends on the results of general relativity. If the electric cosmos hypothesis had any merit even so simple a device as a compass could tell you nothing useful. You don't know what you're talking about.
Though frankly, most days I suspect you've adopted a deliberately contrarian persona here for entertainment purposes and in real life you know better.
Like my other brother Bar, no, I don't get it either. That image suggests there's a causal connection between vaccination and all those other medical issues, and the data do not sustain that claim. Maybe you could do a little research on infant and child mortality before and after the advent of vaccination. My grandparents were the first generation in history that could routinely expect all their children to survive to adulthood.
Yes - I get it everyone was wrong. Bu8t how ere they proved wrong. Perhaps through the same science you pretend not to believe.
And you don't do thinking very well do you? I notice you provide your usual lack of evidence to prove anything I post wrong. What happened? Have you run out of pseudoscience sites?