the vaccine fraud exposed by science

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
I'm surprised you haven't brought up Somalia, where giving vaccinations has actually killed a bunch of kids.


It's all part of the big pharma plan, of course.
 

Musky

Time Out
May 19, 2017
734
0
16
Somehow I don't think you are not all that hard to fool. But let's just do a little test.

How many of these phenomena do you believe in?
1. Law of gravity
2. Nuclear physics
3. Ohm's Law
4. Archimedes Law
5. Avogadro's Law
6. Fermi Pardox

I could go on at length with with list, but I hope it is not necessary. Instead I will refer to a link listing scientific laws. Of course, in your confused set of semi-religious beliefs you are free to refuse to believe in any of them. However, perhaps you should take a good look the others in CC who agree with you. When you have obviously confused individuals like Bonehead supporting you, then perhaps you should consider revising your thinking, provided you are capable of intelligent thought.List of scientific laws named after people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ki/List_of_scientific_laws_named_after_people

You are a glutten for punishment....can't wait to see the answer.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Shocking Conclusion: IOM Unable to Make Causation Conclusions for Most Vaccine-Related Adverse Health Outcomes

(re:The first IOM reports on vaccine safety came out in 1991 (pertussis and rubella vaccines)15 and 1994 (DPT, polio, tetanus, diphtheria, measles, mumps, HIB and hepatitis B vaccines))

"What I call this category is the 'We Don't Know' category. When you think about it, these vaccines are mandated for children, and yet in most instances the scientific evidence [of safety] is so poor, they don't know!


IOM Did Not Exonerate Vaccines as Being Safe for Everyone

[youtube]se33NzQAZCk[/youtube]

Dr. Mercola Interviews Barbara Loe Fisher (IOM)

IOM:
IOM's Vaccine Safety Review Is Still of Massive Importance
This is a perfect time to mention the IOM's vaccine safety review, "Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality,"14 published in August 2011. Along with other reports the IOM has published on vaccine safety issues beginning in 1991, it is one of the most important scientific reviews of evidence in the medical literature that vaccines can cause injury and death.

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) through the IOM (recently renamed Health and Medicine Division) historically has analyzed health policies and issued reports at the request of the U.S. government. Considered worldwide to be a prestigious scientific body, the NAS is funded not just by federal agencies, but also by pharmaceutical companies and independent philanthropic organizations and individuals.

Although vaccine safety advocates have criticized the IOM's reports as being too conservative and minimizing the full extent of vaccine risks, no other recognized scientific authority has so clearly acknowledged that vaccines do cause harm, especially for susceptible individuals, and that there are large vaccine science knowledge gaps about safety that need to be addressed.

New Studies Reveal Vaccine Harm
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Somehow I don't think you are not all that hard to fool. But let's just do a little test.

How many of these phenomena do you believe in?
1. Law of gravity
2. Nuclear physics
3. Ohm's Law
4. Archimedes Law
5. Avogadro's Law
6. Fermi Pardox

I could go on at length with with list, but I hope it is not necessary. Instead I will refer to a link listing scientific laws. Of course, in your confused set of semi-religious beliefs you are free to refuse to believe in any of them. However, perhaps you should take a good look the others in CC who agree with you. When you have obviously confused individuals like Bonehead supporting you, then perhaps you should consider revising your thinking, provided you are capable of intelligent thought.List of scientific laws named after people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ki/List_of_scientific_laws_named_after_people

I am a certified industrial machanic are you suggesting that for over thirty years I have violated the applied laws of physics and been paid for it on schedual. Your deviation from the subject at hand demonstrates an aquaintance with science less than required to enter into debate about vaccination efficacy. It is telling that your first listed item "gravity"remains unexplained by the establishment as does rain as does biotic oil as does solar radiation as does weather including the physics of wind. I suggest that you imagine things to be settled that are not at all settled.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
I am a certified industrial machanic...
That's interesting, in other exchanges you've claimed to be a scientist. It might help your credibility a little if you could spell your job title correctly. It was of course perfectly obvious that you're not a scientist, anybody who buys the electric cosmos hypothesis or thinks Velikovsky was on to something important and useful has no real understanding of science at all. I suggest you're not in a strong position to argue about the science that underlies vaccination. You have no understanding of what science is, what it claims, and how it works. And it DOES work, you're surrounded by products of its insights. If science was as fundamentally wrong as you claim it is, none of the electronic devices in your life would work, they depend on the results of quantum theory, and GPS systems would be uselessly inaccurate, their accuracy depends on the results of general relativity. If the electric cosmos hypothesis had any merit even so simple a device as a compass could tell you nothing useful. You don't know what you're talking about.

Though frankly, most days I suspect you've adopted a deliberately contrarian persona here for entertainment purposes and in real life you know better.

Like my other brother Bar, no, I don't get it either. That image suggests there's a causal connection between vaccination and all those other medical issues, and the data do not sustain that claim. Maybe you could do a little research on infant and child mortality before and after the advent of vaccination. My grandparents were the first generation in history that could routinely expect all their children to survive to adulthood.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
T
Like my other brother Bar, no, I don't get it either. That image suggests there's a causal connection between vaccination and all those other medical issues, and the data do not sustain that claim. Maybe you could do a little research on infant and child mortality before and after the advent of vaccination. My grandparents were the first generation in history that could routinely expect all their children to survive to adulthood.
And perhaps not all are supposed to survive. I am of the mind set that nature cannot be tamed or bent to our whims. There is imbalance in the world and much of it is caused by human ego. We are no more important than any other life form and I have grave doubts about our claims to intelligence and the epitome of evolutionary superiority. Our immune system is designed to take care of itself and vaccines are an unnatural process of intervention that weakens our immune system's ability to regulate itself. I won't get into the fact the Big Phama is profit based and therefore not really concerned with anything but creating customers. We are a society that has sterilized itself too death. We need more dirt in our lives not more sterility.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
536
113
Regina, SK
There is no evidence that vaccines weaken the immune system. The logical extreme of that argument is that there should be no medical intervention at all, for anything, let nature take its course. I presume you wouldn't subscribe to that idea. I'd agree that we've gone too far in the cleanliness department, over-use of antibacterial agents just creates superbugs,so here at Chateau Sinister it's plain old soap and water for all cleaning tasks. Vaccines are no more unnatural than soap. Nature doesn't make soap. But it does make infectious agents that can kill us, I think it's smart to try to prevent them from succeeding.
 
Last edited:

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Somehow I don't think you are not all that hard to fool. But let's just do a little test.

How many of these phenomena do you believe in?
1. Law of gravity
2. Nuclear physics
3. Ohm's Law
4. Archimedes Law
5. Avogadro's Law
6. Fermi Pardox

I could go on at length with with list, but I hope it is not necessary. Instead I will refer to a link listing scientific laws. Of course, in your confused set of semi-religious beliefs you are free to refuse to believe in any of them. However, perhaps you should take a good look the others in CC who agree with you. When you have obviously confused individuals like Bonehead supporting you, then perhaps you should consider revising your thinking, provided you are capable of intelligent thought.List of scientific laws named after people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ki/List_of_scientific_laws_named_after_people

At one time everyone knew the world was flat. At one time everyone knew that Earth is the center of the universe. Get the idea yet?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
Nature provides all we need to cure any disease.

Albert Einstein has been widely quoted as saying, "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift."
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
At one time everyone knew the world was flat. At one time everyone knew that Earth is the center of the universe. Get the idea yet?

Yes - I get it everyone was wrong. Bu8t how ere they proved wrong. Perhaps through the same science you pretend not to believe.

(Thinks WAPO is a scientific source!...^)
You don't do "peer review" very well do you?

And you don't do thinking very well do you? I notice you provide your usual lack of evidence to prove anything I post wrong. What happened? Have you run out of pseudoscience sites?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
That's interesting, in other exchanges you've claimed to be a scientist. It might help your credibility a little if you could spell your job title correctly. It was of course perfectly obvious that you're not a scientist, anybody who buys the electric cosmos hypothesis or thinks Velikovsky was on to something important and useful has no real understanding of science at all. I suggest you're not in a strong position to argue about the science that underlies vaccination. You have no understanding of what science is, what it claims, and how it works. And it DOES work, you're surrounded by products of its insights. If science was as fundamentally wrong as you claim it is, none of the electronic devices in your life would work, they depend on the results of quantum theory, and GPS systems would be uselessly inaccurate, their accuracy depends on the results of general relativity. If the electric cosmos hypothesis had any merit even so simple a device as a compass could tell you nothing useful. You don't know what you're talking about.

Though frankly, most days I suspect you've adopted a deliberately contrarian persona here for entertainment purposes and in real life you know better.

Like my other brother Bar, no, I don't get it either. That image suggests there's a causal connection between vaccination and all those other medical issues, and the data do not sustain that claim. Maybe you could do a little research on infant and child mortality before and after the advent of vaccination. My grandparents were the first generation in history that could routinely expect all their children to survive to adulthood.

Of course things seem perfectly obvious to you. It's because you believe in settled science. Of course we are gratefull that your grandparents hung in here because of greatly improved nutrition and hygene the responsible agencies for that generations success statistically it had nothing at all to do with vaccination.

I practice science and follow the method, I don't need any paper authority to make those claims nor establishment approval.
RON HATCH: Relativity in the Light of GPS | EU 2013

Perhaps you’ve already heard that GPS, by the very fact that it WORKS, confirms Einstein’s relativity; also that Black Holes must be real. But these are little more than popular fictions, according to the distinguished GPS expert Ron Hatch. Here Ron describes GPS data that refute fundamental tenets of both …
Continue reading
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Yes - I get it everyone was wrong. Bu8t how ere they proved wrong. Perhaps through the same science you pretend not to believe.



And you don't do thinking very well do you? I notice you provide your usual lack of evidence to prove anything I post wrong. What happened? Have you run out of pseudoscience sites?

I'll repeat it AGAIN for the slow:

you don't do peer review at all:
all you have is BS
;)
so fine, go SCREW those children
(660 percent more NNDs in vaccinated premie children) and have a nice day
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Just wait till the way vaccines create histimosis gets out, and what results from that issue.
(660% NNDs as mentioned in the peer reviewed articles I posted for example...which is why SSRIs don't work)
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
http://www.naturalnews.com/author/isabelle
ALL HEALING NUTRIENTS found in cannabis are made from carbon dioxide, the “miracle molecule” for plant life across our planet

(Natural News) When you hear celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio declare war on carbon dioxide, it’s hard not to roll your eyes and think “Smoke another one, Leo.” Of course, that wouldn’t really be possible if we somehow did manage to get rid of all the carbon dioxide on Earth. That’s because this life-giving molecule is essential to all … [Read More...]