This outfit strikes me as being a world leader when it comes to parasites. Is it time to "deep six" them? Any ideas? What would it take to get rid of them?
They are just an interim government until the NWO is in place.
Probably won't happen in our life time. We'll see how this North American Union thing pans out first.When is it going to happen and who is going to be in charge?:lol:
The UN was set up following World War II to ensure that no other Hitler ever comes to power in any country again. Therefore the UN should have SUPPORTED the War in Iraq, in which Saddam was ousted and hanged, rather than have been against it. An equivalent stance in 1939, if it had been around then, would have seen it not supporting Britain and France's declaration of war against Nazi Germany.
A BBC poll in 2004 showed that a majority of Britons thought that there should be times when Britain should go to war, if it was for a good reason, even if the UN was against it.
The UN was set up following World War II to ensure that no other Hitler ever comes to power in any country again. Therefore the UN should have SUPPORTED the War in Iraq, in which Saddam was ousted and hanged, rather than have been against it. An equivalent stance in 1939, if it had been around then, would have seen it not supporting Britain and France's declaration of war against Nazi Germany.
A BBC poll in 2004 showed that a majority of Britons thought that there should be times when Britain should go to war, if it was for a good reason, even if the UN was against it.
TA BBC poll in 2004 showed that a majority of Britons thought that there should be times when Britain should go to war, if it was for a good reason, even if the UN was against it.
Saddam was gassing his people for decades, the Americans supported Saddam through this. It was only when he invaded Kuwait and interfered with the oil is when the Americans had a problem. Not when he was destroying his own people.
I think there are aspects of the UN that are useful. If it were me, however, I would be a lot more choosy about which countries were members.
Only to you, I think. Why would I, as the UN, want to consider the words of countries that do nothing but abuse their populations? Why would I not kick them out of the room and exclude them from further discussion amongst reasonable countries?The fact that it is a meating place for nations to discuus issues you comment makes no sense.
All or none.
The truth hurts, I guess. Some countries just can't handle freedom of info.