Oh spare us your whining and get off the soap box.
It is a SCAM! A money making, wealth distribution scam with the potential of a Trillion Plus dollar windfall.
The top ten global warming 'skeptic' arguments answered
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
Oh spare us your whining and get off the soap box.
It is a SCAM! A money making, wealth distribution scam with the potential of a Trillion Plus dollar windfall.
Being committed to not believing something for political, religious or economic reasons shouldn't be confused with being factually right.
To understand something as complex as Global Warming we need to strip those things away and look at what the evidence indicates.
And the science behind Global Warming is clear, it's real, it's here and it's serious...already. And it's going to get catastrophic on a global scale as we proceed with no mitigation efforts.
To understand something as complex as Global Warming we need to strip those things away and look at what the evidence indicates.
And the science behind Global Warming is clear, it's real, it's here and it's serious...already. And it's going to get catastrophic on a global scale as we proceed with no mitigation efforts.
Funny, I feel exactly the same about your position, the difference is you've got corporations like Philip Morris, BP, ExxonMobil and people like the Koch Brothers, Fred Seitz and Fred Singer at your back and a well documented pattern of fraud.
And the science has hundreds of years of real world evidence backing it up, which do think is going to prevail?
Oh you have all the right names up there.
Keep guzzling the Kool-Aid CK!
Oh you forgot to add all of the other scientists that KNOW this is hog wash and a scam.
What an inconvenient truth that there is not a true consensus among the scientific community.
OUCH!
Oh you mad now!
You and another tard giving me reddies like a couple of tornadoes. I LOVE IT!
It has, but most of it is going into the oceans which have a thermal density 1,000 times that of the atmosphere, but we're still getting top ten global temperature averages set at a time when otherwise there would be cooling as with the recent decline in solar activity and the presence of strong La Nina conditions.
It's equivalent to about 400,000 Hiroshima sized nuclear bombs a day.
Show how the fundamental forcing produced by increasing the amount of a gas that absorbs outgoing EM radiation in real terms, not this denial rhetoric that is virtually empty of any real content.
What surprises me is how many people are duped by this crap.
Can D.C. survive 'unstoppable' ice melt? - WTOP.com
Can D.C. survive 'unstoppable' ice melt? - WTOP.com
see above, if you're not going to believe the evidence presented then why not go back to making negative downchecks from the shadows as you've been doing for most of my posts on this subject.
Obviously you're a committed Global Warming contrarian.
considering how dishonest the denial campaign is, I'm pretty sure your "surprise" is just as manufactured as the "skeptisicm" of contrarians.
Anything that doesn't agree with the scam ... er I mean Global Warming "science" must be dishonest. Otherwise, the bubble would burst.
Wow, Will Rodgers is that really you!?
Folk wisdom is about as useful for understanding quantum mechanics as tits on a boar...
Guess you didn't really read the OP or if you did, didn't understand it.
It would be nice to have a rational discussion on this crucial topic, but as that's pretty much impossible with people who have their minds plugged- an amazing feat btw - I'll bid adieu.
