Since Quebec belongs to Anglo-Canadains and not the ungratefull Quebecois. I think the Quebecois should be sent to set up a homeland somewhere else.
You know what s_lone, as much as I half heartedly agree with your view on the General. He is voicing his dismay at what he sees as an ungrateful group. A view I share with him.I have officially put you on my ignore list; you will no longer hear from me Wolfy. The stench of your stagnant intellect is too much to endure.
And I appriciate that, as I do your words and views. You are with out a doubt the most level headed separatist I have ever met.CDN bear, Wolfy is only repeating the same old thing since the beginning and has proved unable to have a normal and reasonable discussion on the subject. I'm just tired of reading the same old thing so if eventually he posts something smart, let me know and I will look it up. You think I can discuss with someone saying "death to Quebec nationalism"? I prefer ignoring him then to become agressive with him.
S_Lone
The French are Fascist when it comes to their language. Only in France their is a language ministry to enforce French. Hell the French are so chaunvinsitic about their language that President Chriac left a confrence when he heard a fellow Frenchmen speakin English. The Language Ministry in Quebec remindes me of the Taliban Relgieous Minstry that forced Islam down the throats of people and whom force women to cover up and force men to grow beards.
The Language Police are a bunch of Linguestic Fascists who should be dismantled.
If the French won in the French and Indian War they would have banned English and drove of all the Anglo-Canadians by ethnic cleansing. The French are so intollerant of other languages, but unlike the French the British are so tollerant of other language they allowd the French language to continue in Quebec. Maybe the Anglo-Canadains should copy the French and impose the English language on Quebec.
IN DEMOCRATIC NATIONS THEIR SHOULD BE NO LANGUAGE POLICE.
That's a good point, but if you missed it, some of the sepratists have suggested that the non French can move out of Quebec, so why can't the French.What if the Swiss and the Alaskans don't want Canadian French? Even France doesn't want Canadian French there (except as tourists).
The idea of moving a people that have lived in an area for a couple hundred years is no different than that of the people that confiscated a piece of land to make room for the Israeli at the chagrin of the others that occupied that area. It's childish. How does Switzerland deal with having different cultures within its borders? It seems to be a relatively content and peaceful population.
Absolutely not, it is a duty to preserve ones culture. But to what extent is that duty to go, before it becomes detrimental to the well being of all.The laws used to preserve French are I agree, quite debatable, but is it a crime to preserve one's culture?
Well, I admit to forgetting alot of history, but I still stand by what I said and it goes for both sides of the issue. I see forcing people out of where they live as abuse of authority and it is childish: "It's my sandbox and you can't be here, nyah nyah".That's a good point, but if you missed it, some of the sepratists have suggested that the non French can move out of Quebec, so why can't the French.
As to your Israeli analogy, the territory in question, was actually theirs to begin with, They were forced out, much like the Natives of North America. Being mandated the chance to go home again seems pretty justified, no matter who was squatting on their land.
Absolutely not, it is a duty to preserve ones culture. But to what extent is that duty to go, before it becomes detrimental to the well being of all.
Lets see, bill 101 polarized a nation against the Quebecois. Did it serve any real good?
Or was it better at sticking it to the Anglais then it was at preserving Francais culture?
Have a Merry Christmas s_lone!!!One thing is for sure, asking newly arrived immigrants to send their kids to French schools has very largely contributed to the survival of French in Quebec.
(This is an interseting debate but I really gotta catch that bus now... I'll stay tuned...)
Y'all be well.
Exactly, people cannot seem to cooperate anymore; taking sides in some idiotic polarisation seems to be almost mandatory these days. Today's politics and press seem to be wroking to ensure this distastful activity, too.Absolutely not, it is a duty to preserve ones culture. But to what extent is that duty to go, before it becomes detrimental to the well being of all.
Lets see, bill 101 polarized a nation against the Quebecois. Did it serve any real good?
Or was it better at sticking it to the Anglais then it was at preserving Francais culture?