not when the word f*ck is in it, problem solved, we have a go Houston.Not even smart enough to post a pic, eh.
not when the word f*ck is in it, problem solved, we have a go Houston.Not even smart enough to post a pic, eh.
He was found FU CKING GUILTY!!!!!!!!! There is no "statute of limitations" when you have been found GUILTY and then fled the jurisdiction.The fu cking scum back ran like a little kid instead of taking responsibility for his fu cking actions. Why would ANYONE try to find some way out for this piece of shyte? It's not like we are not sure if he fu cked the 13 yr old. There is no doubt about that. It is a done deal.
I'm not arguing any of that. I've heard there is a 7 year limitations on many crimes. Not sure what it is for fleeing custody. He's not the first guy, wasn't Jerry Lee Lewis guilty of the same thing?
Wow, just wow. What ever.
Polanski is a grease ball that needs to go to jail for rape and pay the same price as all other child rapist.
Not even smart enough to post a pic, eh.
Neither am I Gerry and what are you going to do about it?
I know you're not. You aren't even smart enough to use google to learn anything. Like what is meant by statute of limitations and what does it apply to. I'm surprised that you are able to use a computer.
No worries, Gerry, there's probably a lot of sh*t about me that may surprise you. If you have even the slightest inkling about Google you'll know that there's a lot of sh*t that Google can't find for you. I have a basic knowledge of the statute of limitations, but I don't know any of the details. So what? I have "other fish to fry". I didn't even know how to turn a computer on until I was 53 years old, but I could use a slide rule and a book of Chamber's Tables. So go f**k your hat!
Sorry, you don't have a clue about that statute, otherwise you wouldn't have invoked it for this instance.
Sorry, you don't have a clue about that statute, otherwise you wouldn't have invoked it for this instance.
So what?
Who invoked it? Not I!, "What's the statute of limitations say?" Or did you not read that part of my post?
and they say nothing about after a person has been charged and found guilty. If you had any idea at all, you wouldn't have asked such a stupid question. They speak to how long from the time an act has been done to when a person is charged for that act.
Weren't you taught back around grade 3 that there is no such thing as a stupid question? Maybe you were asleep during that class.
Ya, that was told to the idiots so they didn't feel bad about themselves. I gather you were told that a lot.
Did you ever replace the 4 * with 'f*uck' with no * then you will get the picture. Oh yeah, I'm a little slow or I would have already asked you why your (not so) eagle eyes didn't pick up on that 'flaw'. Waiting, . . .Not even smart enough to post a pic, eh.
Since this would be data as anonymous as a poll why not take the number of 'complaints taken' rather than 'convictions' Being in a place where you are powerless is 'unlawful imprisonment' and sexual abuse is committed and then the worst is that you are labeled a 'liar' if you say anything about it.Weren't you taught back around grade 3 that there is no such thing as a stupid question? Maybe you were asleep during that class.