Philip2
Thanks for the heads-up regarding the Lysander Spooner p iece..
A concept that's been embedded in English Common Law since Magna Carta is the precept that a judicial proceeding is just as much a test of the fabric and character of the law as it is about resolution of precived criminality....
We don't live in Canada or anywhere else for that matter under a system of laws that objectively and morally synthesizes this concept allowing it to emerge as an active element within judicial systems. We are rather content to admit that our (Canadian) system of law is actually a two-tiered marginalization of the common man at the whim of the wealthy and powerful. Our system of law is made a wh0re by the preparedness of the people to admit of this reality in silent acquiescence. Our laws are manipulated not on the basis of rights (both natural and artificial constructs of the social organizing principle) but to benefit some at the expense of others.
If Don Imus had made a comment about "yarmulke wearing nabobs" as opposed to what he did say...does anyone think for a moment that he'd be back on radio..?
When Martha Stewart serves five months "house arrest" for insider-trading and then returned to pontificate on the air-waves does anyone who's ever used "inside" info at the race track think they'd get the same slap on the wrist?
When Brian Mulroney cast the integrity and principles of public office into the dirt (as someone who'd chastise the banana republic dictator for "being..on-the-take" does anyone believe that this elected nabob has even a vague concept of what he'd term honor integrity and responsibility? And who among our political structure today is any better?
The law is an ass, and we're all riding it....