:smile: I have read that many of the old war hawks have found their way over into the new camp. I'll spend a bit of time and investigate a few names. Some, like Gates, Reed and Scowcroft are obvious.I'm still convinced we'll (the US) be involved in another armed conflict in the very near future. However the recent elections here have removed those with trigger fingers for now.
There we have the reason for wars: They are good for the economy!Something else. FDR didn't get the US out of the Great Depression. He did put many people back to work and gave them some hope. The real healer was WW II when the US began manufacturing for the European nations before the US actually entered the war. Right after WW II was ended we got back into economic woes again and then along came the Korean War.
But, Norm, it doesn't matter for the bombers! No, I can't imagine the US going to fight Pakistan. They might have under Bush supported and fired on India against Pakistan.If the US thinks they had trouble in Iraq, lets see what happens when they try out a war at 12,000+ feet in elevation.
I did look it over. Igt lists all the Terror attacks of the last two month! I trust you for checking out the source; it is probably true. To contrust that list against a list of UIS-led attacks I searched with google, but couldn't come up with anything comparable. Were you meaning to point out to me how serious and numerous attacks from Muslims are? I think they are just fighting back whichever way they can.I have a site for you to look over. It is TheReligionofPeace.com - Islam: Making a True Difference in the World Look on the left margin and select Attacks and tell me what you think I did verify the integrity of the information, but like everyting else here we only get to learn about whatever they want us to know. This was an eye opener to me.
Here is an article that tells you WHY they fight back:
Paul Craig Roberts: Muslim Revolution