That thing reads like it was written by captain morgan. Here's a few things..
1.) Subjective assertion about his mortgage dealings - I wouldn't make any assumptions yet, and using the term "champagne socialist" is a clear red flag about her ..um.. allegiances.
2.) Dutch disease has already been shown. If you want to split hairs about the degree of influence, that's fine, but her rhetoric is clearly some form of shilling.
3.) She takes one sound bite about his commentary on the vastness of the oilsands and turns it into a negative. Then she changes the goalpost and goes for the divisive attack which we've all heard before and has been debunked.
Also, she's a self-proclaimed conservative so there is no doubt some influence there.
I can understand criticism, but she's just reciting a lot of talking points that we've gone over already.