What you describe is an interesting phenomena..........descendants of people who escaped totalitarian regimes......falling for what they must have been told about and warned about.
Mueller report is in..
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
Let me guess, Israel wasn't mentioned once. It appears the US intelligence community is far from being intelligent at all.
https://jewishinsider.com/2016/09/d...sm-israel-advances-to-world-baseball-classic/
Daily Kickoff: Clinton, Trump meet Bibi ahead of debate | Bibi responds to Lindsey Graham’s criticism | Israel advances to World Baseball Classic
https://jewishinsider.com/2016/09/d...sm-israel-advances-to-world-baseball-classic/
Daily Kickoff: Clinton, Trump meet Bibi ahead of debate | Bibi responds to Lindsey Graham’s criticism | Israel advances to World Baseball Classic
I've seen it around here with Poles who grew up in a Communist Dictatorship having deep admiration for the new "strong" leader.
You'd think that they'd have learned.
Right observation but the ones that control Canada are the UK and France and as you can tell, Ontario and Quebec are blights on Canada rather than being as asset.
https://www.historians.org/about-ah...es-canada-govern-itself-or-does-britain-do-it
How Does Canada Govern Itself, Or Does Britain Do It?
The British Constitution and the American Constitution, which are very different, are blended in Canada. Like the United States; Canada has a federal form of government. It was copied from the American example, with variations inspired by American experience and Canadian needs.
The division of authority between the Canadian Parliament and the provincial legislatures is much the same as that between Congress and the state legislatures. But instead of leaving the provinces all the power that was not specifically conferred upon the Dominion, in accordance with the American principle, the Canadians adopted the opposite principle. They gave the residue of authority to the federal government. This seemed to be the great lesson taught by our war between the North and the South, during which the framers of the Canadian constitution did most of their work. Thus the Canadian constitution bears the indelible stamp of the American Civil War. In practice, however, the provinces have gained in power through judicial interpretation of the constitution.
Another difference is that no province can legislate on banking or criminal law. These are subjects wholly within the federal field. The criminal law is therefore uniform throughout the country, and so is the banking system.
Our duplicate system of courts, federal and state, was also rejected in Canada. There the same courts, with permanently appointed judges, administer both federal and provincial law. Yet another difference is that the constitution bound the federal government to subsidize the provincial governments.
Canada resembles the United States rather than Britain in having a written constitution. This is the British North America Act (commonly referred to as the BNA Act) of 1867 and its amendments. But if you take it literally it will give you very false notions of how the country is actually governed, as we shall see presently. The reason is that Canada also has an unwritten constitution—like the British—and this governs the operation of the written one.
The most vital part of the Canadian system of government is wholly British and totally un-American. It is the fusion of the executive and the legislative branches of government in the cabinet, which is chosen from the leaders of the majority party in the Parliament at Ottawa. When the Canadians formed their federal union in 1867, they already had this British system in the provinces. They were so convinced by experience and observation that it was better than the American, with its separation of powers and its checks and balances, that they would not consider adopting ours.
The real boss
Americans are sometimes misled by the fact that government in Canada is conducted in the name of the king. By the letter of the BNA Act, the king rules Canada through the governor general, whom he appoints. In turn, the governor general supposedly rules the provinces through lieutenant governors, whom he appoints. But in reality the Dominion government chooses the governor general and the lieutenant governors—who, like the king himself, are only figureheads.
The real head of the federal government, legislative as well as executive, is the prime minister, in whom all power is concentrated and all responsibility focused. He does not rim for election to this high position, nor does he hold it for any fixed period. Moreover there is no law defining it.
The requirements are political rather than legal. The prime minister must be a member of the House of Commons and, more than that, he has to be the leader of the majority party in the House. If he fills the bill, the governor general has no other choice than to appoint him. As prime minister, or real head of the executive, he picks and controls the cabinet. These heads of the various executive departments he selects from his own followers in the House, where he and they remain. There they are answerable to the other members for any and every administrative act.
With the help of his cabinet, the prime minister leads the debates in the House and directs the legislative program. The Senate, unlike ours, is not elected but appointed, has no special powers, and is politically, though not legally, subordinate to the House of Commons. Thus the prime minister runs Parliament as well as the administration. And he can continue in power indefinitely—as long as he remains the acknowledged leader of the House of Commons. But the moment he loses this leadership he has to resign, unless by calling an election he can get a new house that will follow him.
Here is the internal balance of the Canadian constitution, which is quite different from the balance in ours. On the one hand, the members of the House of Commons can turn the prime minister out of office at any time, which enforces his responsibility to them and through them to the people. On the other hand, he can turn the House out to face an election at any time, which gives him a disciplinary control over irresponsible members. As soon as a deadlock appears, it forces a general election, thus ending the deadlock by an appeal to the people.
There is no fixed period for general elections, either federal or provincial. One can be held at any time the government wishes. But there is a limit of five years to the life of the Canadian federal Parliament and the provincial legislatures.
Loosening the reins of empire
Canada got independence without having to fight to it. The American Revolution taught Britain never to tax a colony again. But it also persuaded the British that they should not let the remaining colonies get out of hand or they would break away too. This meant trying to hold them by controlling their governments, and the result was a growing strain in each colony. A little over a century ago two miniature rebellions in Canada startled London into sending out a leading statesman to find what was wrong and how to put it right.
This man was Lord Durham, whose report is a milestone in the history of Canada and of the whole British Empire. He insisted that the only way to keep the colonies was to let them govern themselves as they wished. The magic power of liberty, he proclaimed, would hold the colonial empire together. Soon the British government put his formula to the test, and at once it began to work. That was almost a hundred years ago.
Though mistress in its own house, Canada was a subordinate partner in the Empire. The British government had the legal right to veto any act of the Canadian Parliament, a right that was used once in the early days of the Dominion and never again. Canadian legislation was liable to be overridden by acts of the British Parliament arid could not touch the subject of merchant shipping, which Britain regulated for the whole Empire. Canadian foreign relations had to be conducted, at least formally, through the channel of the British Foreign Office. And Canada was bound by the actions of Britain in declaring war and making peace.
These remains of imperial control were all removed after World War I, in which Canada played an important part and earned the right to equality. Along with the other self-governing dominions, Canada got the right to have its own diplomatic service, inaugurated in 1927 by exchanging ministers with the United States, and later extended by exchanges with many other countries. In the imperial conference of 1926, the following important declaration was unanimously adopted: “The group of self-governing communities composed of Great Britain and the Dominions … are autonomous communities within the Empire, equal in status, in no way subordinate one to another.” After much further consultation between the governments of the Empire, this principle was translated into law by the Statute of Westminster, which the Briitish Parliament passedin 1931.
The last remnants of subordination
Only two limitations upon full Canadian autonomy remain, and these only by Canadian consent. One is in the administration of justice. The highest court of appeals is the Privy Council in London. Canada has stopped all criminal appeals to the Privy Council, and some civil appeals. In all probability Canada will stop the others too when a good solution is found for the problem raised by the second limitation.
The second limitation is that for important amendments of the written part of the constitution Canada has to go to the British Parliament. This may seem strange in light of the fact that the other dominions can amend their constitutions themselves. The explanation lies in Canada’s dual nationality. A formula has yet to be found that would protect the rights of French Canada, the minority, without making amendment too difficult to be practical. Some of the best minds in Canada have been working hard on this problem, and they may soon solve it.
We should also notice another question that worried many Canadians during the years between the two World Wars. They argued that as long as the Dominion retained the British connection the country might he plunged into war by a decision of the mother country over which Canada had no control—as in 1914.
This question, upon which the Statute of Westminster was silent, was finally answered in 1939. When Britain then went to war, Eire declared its neutrality, South Africa wavered on the brink before plunging in, and Canada asserted its independence in this most important decision of all by making its own declaration of war.
Even today many otherwise well-informed Americans cannot quite grasp the fact that Britain no longer exercises any control over Canadian policy. Canadians are more than a little sensitive on this point. There is much truth in the shrewd Canadian jest that the only wayBritain might persuade Canada to do anything isto suggest the opposite.
Maybe, totalitarian regimes are comfy as long as you don't ask what happened to your grand parents.
That's where China is at.
Liar. WTH ell do you think the opium wars were all about. It was the Rothschild attempt at beating China. China is still China and the Rothschild family are the most evil people on the planet. You need any of that explained in more detail?? Pay attention to what is said about Russia too.
Yes....Totalitarian regimes provide a certain "security. Decisions are mostly made for the population....... therefore they don't have to think too much and as long as they get along and go a long........they live in a false sense of security. .......until they get a Hitler type at the helm.........Hitler was clinically insane......so it can happen anywhere........when a population is dumbed down.
Hitler was in good with the Jewish bankers until they knifed him in the back and put the blame for WWII onto his shoulders when the facts point to both wars being as fake as they could be and the whole program was to steal Palestine for the Jews that God does not recognize.
Why are the retards here the only ones that are unaware of that fact??
This is what a complete fukking retard sounds like.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/world-war-ii-myths
21 Of The Biggest Misconceptions About World War II
From the 400,000 Axis soldiers on American shores to the real reason the Japanese surrendered, these World War II myths are sure to surprise.
So ingrained is the widely accepted narrative of World War II that we can recount the conflict's history in a short series of mere phrases: Hitler rises, France falls, the Holocaust begins, Pearl Harbor burns, D-Day commences, the bomb drops.
However, this narrative -- even in its most fully fleshed-out form -- misrepresents why and when the war started, how and where it progressed along the way, and why and when it ended. This narrative likewise conceals both the greatest devastation committed by the war's "villains" and the greatest triumphs achieved by its "heroes."
Did you know, for example, that the war didn't begin in 1939 and didn't end because of the bomb? Did you know that Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't even the deadliest bombings of the war, that 400,000 Axis soldiers made it onto American shores, or that the body count of the Holocaust is about twice as big as you think it is?
The facts and photos above begin to reveal the story of the war as it actually happened, not the narrative propagated by its most powerful victors after the fact. These are 21 World War II myths that desperately needed to be debunked.
Myth: The Holocaust's total death toll was 6 million Jews
It is unequivocally clear that approximately 6 million Jews perished at the hands of the Nazis.
However, that oft-quoted number says nothing of the other nearly half of the Holocaust's total death toll. In addition to the 6 million Jews, the Nazis used their death camps to exterminate a further 5 million civilians coming from many diverse groups including communists, Roma, Serbs, Polish intelligentsia, homosexuals, the disabled, and more.
So much for there being any facts involved.
Last edited:
Did you take a breath in the middle of that?Hitler was in good with the Jewish bankers until they knifed him in the back and put the blame for WWII onto his shoulders when the facts point to both wars being as fake as they could be and the whole program was to steal Palestine for the Jews that God does not recognize.
Why are the retards here the only ones that are unaware of that fact??
This is what a complete fukking retard sounds like.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Adolf Hitler didn't want to kill the Jews, but a Muslim convinced him to do it.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/world-war-ii-myths
21 Of The Biggest Misconceptions About World War II
By John Kuroski
Published October 25, 2016
Updated March 25, 2019
From the 400,000 Axis soldiers on American shores to the real reason the Japanese surrendered, these World War II myths are sure to surprise.
21 Of The Biggest Misconceptions About World War II
View Gallery
So ingrained is the widely accepted narrative of World War II that we can recount the conflict's history in a short series of mere phrases: Hitler rises, France falls, the Holocaust begins, Pearl Harbor burns, D-Day commences, the bomb drops.
However, this narrative -- even in its most fully fleshed-out form -- misrepresents why and when the war started, how and where it progressed along the way, and why and when it ended. This narrative likewise conceals both the greatest devastation committed by the war's "villains" and the greatest triumphs achieved by its "heroes."
Did you know, for example, that the war didn't begin in 1939 and didn't end because of the bomb? Did you know that Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't even the deadliest bombings of the war, that 400,000 Axis soldiers made it onto American shores, or that the body count of the Holocaust is about twice as big as you think it is?
The facts and photos above begin to reveal the story of the war as it actually happened, not the narrative propagated by its most powerful victors after the fact. These are 21 World War II myths that desperately needed to be debunked.
Myth: The Holocaust's total death toll was 6 million Jews
It is unequivocally clear that approximately 6 million Jews perished at the hands of the Nazis.
However, that oft-quoted number says nothing of the other nearly half of the Holocaust's total death toll. In addition to the 6 million Jews, the Nazis used their death camps to exterminate a further 5 million civilians coming from many diverse groups including communists, Roma, Serbs, Polish intelligentsia, homosexuals, the disabled, and more.
So much for there being any facts involved.
The US has been dumbed down since the creation of the FED in 1913. Seem like you are one of the deceived that will never escape their bullshit.
Hitler was a pawn, both WW were designed and operated by the Jewish Bankers.
https://www.rothschildarchive.org/exhibitions/rothschilds_and_the_first_world_war/
1: Rothschilds and the First World War
The First World War and its aftermath changed the world forever. The Rothschild family, who through their businesses and marriages had helped to create 'modern' Europe were deeply affected by the crisis facing the world.
Like royalty, the Rothschilds were forced to abjure family solidarity and to give their loyalty to the countries of their adoption (England, France, Austria and Germany). The family branches in London, Paris, Vienna and Frankfurt did what they could to support the war effort.
Nathaniel, 1st Lord Rothschild (1840-1915) wrote to his cousins in France shortly after War was declared on July 28th:
2: Business during the war
It was vital that the world of commerce and business should continue. In August 1914, the Chancellor Lloyd George sent for the Senior Partner of N M Rothschild & Sons, 'Natty' 1st Lord Rothschild (1840-1915) to discuss what measures should be adopted to keep the currency steady in the time of conflict.
Lloyd George recalled that Natty ‘had a high sense of duty to the State…and was prepared to make sacrifices for what he genuinely believed in’. The Chancellor awaited his visitor with some trepidation, as he was keenly aware that he had made more than one reference 'not of the kind to which the great House of Rothschild had hitherto been subjected'.
'Lord Rothschild,' said Lloyd George as he shook hands, 'we have had some political unpleasantness ... ' Natty brushed the attempted apology aside with his famous curtness. 'No time to bring up such things. What can I do to help?' 'I told him,' wrote Lloyd George 'He undertook to do it at once. It was done.'
Natty died in 1915, and his son Charles (1877-1923) succeeded him at the helm of the London business, guided by his uncles Alfred (1842-1918), and Leopold (1845-1917). Charles served on the committee of the Volunteer Munitions Brigade and offered his services as a financial expert to Lloyd George's Ministry of Munitions.
In France, Edouard Alphonse de Rothschild (1868-1949) managed the business with a fastidious and consciously old-fashioned approach.The Frankfurt house of M A Rothschild & Söhne had been liquidated in 1901, a voluntary decision by the family, as there was no male heir to take on the running of the business.
3: The Jewish War Services Committee
In 1914, a patriotic fervour swept the nation, and the Rothschilds were not alone in embracing the typical ‘mood’ of 1914.
Lionel Nathan de Rothschild (1882-1942) was reluctantly persuaded, by no less than the King himself, that he would serve his country best if he remained at the heart of New Court. He put himself to the tasks of managing the business and placing his considerable resources behind the war effort.
Lionel had established a recruiting office at New Court three months before a War Office Circular of 18th December 1915 formally noted the establishment of a Central Jewish Recruiting Committee with Edmund Sebag-Montefiore as Chairman and Lionel as Vice-chairman. The Committee’s purpose was to encourage the recruitment of Jews. The first meeting was held on December 15th, 1915 at Bryanston Square, home of Edward Sebag* Montefiore, where 'Major Lionel de Rothschild explained the disabilities under which Jewish Recruiting was suffered'.
The site of operations of the Committee was New Court. Initially meeting every 3 or 4 days, and later monthly, the Committee moved quickly to fulfill its purpose. As the war continued, the Committee's remit widened to include matters of welfare of Jewish soldiers, for example providing lodging for Jewish soldiers passing through London, and Jewish Chaplaincy services in the field of battle, working closely with The Visitation Committee of the United Synagogue, and the Jewish Army Chaplain, the Reverend Adler.
The Bank of England waqs taken over by the Jewish bankers in 1815.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/histo...deral-reserve-and-the-bank-of-england/5530318
History of World War II: Nazi Germany was Financed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England
https://archive.org/stream/UsIllega...dmanAFormerJewOnWorldWarsIIiAndIii-9_djvu.txt
https://aladinsmiraclelamp.wordpres...dman-a-former-jew-on-world-wars-i-ii-and-iii/ Trotsky, an agent of the Illuminati Jewish central bankers was supposed to succeed Lenin.) “The Red Symphony,” based on the 1938 NKVD interrogation of Illuminati insider Christian Rakovsky, is definitive proof that world events “are made to happen.” As an agent of the Masonic Jewish central banking cartel, Rakovsky convinced Stalin to negotiate the future Ribbentrop-Molotov pact resulting in the partition of Poland and Britain’s declaration of war against Germany. He said the US would engineer an attack (like Pearl Harbour) to help the USSR after a German invasion. (Griffin 267) Moreover, he confirmed that the goal of the Masonic Jewish central bankers is worldwide Communism, i.e. The New World Order. “There is only one aim, one single aim: the triumph of Communism. It is not Moscow which will impose its will on the democracies but New York, not the “Comintern” but the “Capintern” on Wall Street.” (Griffin, 269) Related- We Have De Facto Communism and Bella Dodd: The A/l/l/O is Communism (from Nov. 9, 2003) By Henry Makow Ph.D. A 1938 Stalinist police interrogation of a founder of the Communist International, Christian G. Rakovsky, 65, facing execution for plotting to overthrow Stalin, laid bare the plot for Jewish banker world tyranny. The 50-page transcript of his interrogation, dubbed “The Red Symphony," was not meant to become public. It confirms that the Rothschild-llluminati plan to use Communism to establish a world dictatorship of the super rich. This is perhaps the most explosive political document in modern history. It reveals why the Illuminati created Hitler and then sought to destroy him, and why Stalin made a pact with Hitler in 1 939. Christian Rakovsky was a veteran Communist insider. Born Chaim Rakeover in 1 873, he studied medicine in France before becoming a revolutionary. He was the leader of a terror group that attacked government officials. In 1919, Lenin put him in charge of the Soviet Ukraine government. He retained the territory for the Bolsheviks during the Civil War. Stalin appointed him Russian ambassador to Paris in 1925. Rakovsky belonged to the powerful Trotskyite faction that took their orders from the Rothschilds. Many of this group were shot in Stalin’s 1 937 Communist Party purge. MIDNIGHT INTERROGATION The circumstances of the midnight interrogation Jan. 26, 1938 were very dramatic. What could Rakovsky possibly say to save his life? Rakovsky appears to use the tactic of “deceiving with the truth.” He wins trust by revealing the truth but leaves some out. He impresses his interrogator that he and Trotsky represent an invincible power he calls and_trotsky_circa_ 1 924_tri, Page 2 of 9 Oct 09, 2016 03:21:1 1AM MDT https://aladinsmiraclelamp.wordpres...dman-a-former-jew-on-world-wars-i-ii-and-iii/ the “Capitalist-Communist Financial International. ” He confirms that the “revolutionary movement” was designed to enlist support by pretending to serve mankind’s moral and collective ideals. The real aim however is to give total world power to the bankers by dividing society and undermining established authority. “Revolution” really means, “overturning” Western civilization. “Christianity is our only real enemy since all the political and economic phenomena of the bourgeois states are only its consequences,” Rakovsky, says. (All page citations from Griffin, Fourth Reich of the Rich, 1988, p. 264) Peace is “counter-revolutionary” since it is war that paves the way for revolution. Rakovsky, whose tongue was loosened by a mild inebriant in his wine, refers to the Illuminati as “they” or “them.” He is a member although not part of the inner circle. He explains that the “Illuminati” is a Masonic secret society dedicated to Communism. Significantly, its founder Adam Weishaupt took the name from “the second anti-Christian conspiracy of that era, gnosticism.” (249)
(in part)
Yeah, "Special Prosecutor"
He still claims that there is an obstruction case against Trump.