More details expected on G20-related police charges

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Blair accepts responsibility..

G20 aftermath: Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair to seek permission to lay more charges

Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair is seeking permission from the civilian police services board to lay more G20 misconduct charges against his officers.

“I’m quite confident we’ll get that permission and then we’ll proceed to hearings,” Blair told reporters at City Hall this morning as he was walking into a closed-camera session with the board. Just before that, Blair was speaking with Mayor Rob Ford’s chief of staff, Amir Remtulla.

Blair must get the permission of the police board because the six month deadline has passed. The board already gave permission for the chief to lay misconduct charges under the police services act against eight constables. Police union head Mike McCormack said about 28 or 29 front line officers are facing G20-related charges.

“I think the number is in the high 20s,” Blair said on Friday.

Blair said senior officers are facing disciplinary action as well. “There are, I believe, directed hearings against two serving senior officers,” he said.

Police hearings act much like a court of law, where officers have the opportunity to defend themselves against charges levied against them. If the charges are upheld, penalties range from docked pay to losing their jobs.

“There also was a finding with respect to two other officers that have retired and I no longer have jurisdiction over them,” said Blair, who did not name the high-ranking officers.

Two investigative reports from Ontario’s police complaints watchdog — obtained yesterday by the Star from complainants — concluded that three senior police officers committed misconduct at the G20 summit two years ago.

One officer is Supt. Mark Fenton, the commander who ordered mass arrests and the unlawful kettling at Queen St. and Spadina Ave. Fenton will now likely face a tribunal hearing because his misconduct has been deemed of a “serious nature.”

The other two senior officers are Supt. Michael Farrar and Staff. Insp. Frank Ruffolo, who were in charge of the prisoner processing facility on Eastern Ave.

The two reports by the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) focus on the kettling and on conditions at the detention centre, which came under fire in the watchdog's scathing review of the G20 earlier this week.

None of the three has been charged under the Police Services Act. Ruffolo, however, is retired, according to a Toronto Police Services bulletin, and can't face disciplinary charges. Farrar retired two years ago, after the G20, according to an officer at 33 Division.

When the police watchdog deems an allegation of misconduct is substantiated, it means investigators believe there is enough evidence to prove that misconduct occurred. The chief then has a range of options available to him. They range from informal resolution to changing a procedure to disciplinary action against an officer, with or without a hearing, according to the OIPRD website.

When asked what his response would be to those calling for his resignation in the wake of a scathing systemic report released earlier this week by OIPRD director Gerry McNeilly, Blair said “I always accept my responsibility for the Toronto Police Service. My job is to ensure that if there were deficiencies in response to the G20 that we deal with that appropriately. And if there are changes to be made in our training, in our procedures, our equipment, in our policies, then that will be done. And there’s accountability.”

Blair added: “And I think as Mr. McNeilly indicated in his report the overwhelming majority of officers who were working in the G20 in Toronto did their jobs quite professionally, quite appropriately.”

He said that all of the 42 recommendations McNeilly listed in his report are being taken “very seriously” by the force. Many were listed in the Toronto police “After Action” report released last June.

The two investigative OIPRD reports focus on the kettling and on conditions at the detention centre, which came under fire in the watchdog's scathing review of the G20 earlier this week.

McNeilly found the Queen and Spadina report — which examined the arrest and boxing in of hundreds of people on the Sunday of the G20 weekend — substantiated the allegations of misconduct that Fenton “committed the misconduct of unlawful exercise of authority” and “discreditable conduct” when he “ordered the unlawful arrest and detention of a group of people in a severe rain storm that included thunder and lightning.”

There was also “clear indication” Fenton knew about the severe weather coming to Toronto and should have had a plan in place, the OIPRD report said. The report did not, however, substantiate allegations of discreditable conduct and excess force made against other officers.

In the prisoner processing report, McNeilly named Farrar, in charge of the facility on Eastern Ave. in the daytime and Ruffolo, who took over during the night shift. “As the most senior officers, they had the responsibility for the care and control of the prisoner,” said the report.

It went on to say “the lack of communication, direction, process and procedure at the PPC speak to the overall command and the inability to address the obstacles and issues that arose during the course of the G20 weekend.”

Allegations of discreditable conduct, neglect of duty and unnecessary force were substantiated against both officers. A further two allegations of discreditable conduct and neglect of duty was found to be substantiated against Farrar, who was also a member of planning team responsible for developing the operational plan for the prisoner facility.

Police spokesman Kevin Masterson confirmed the names of eight constables who have already been charged, and the dates of their hearings, which all take place in the next three months. Those officers, who have not yet had the chance to defend themselves, are: Vincent Wong, Blair Begbie, Alan Li June, Donald Stratton, Michael Kirpoff, Ryan Simpson, Jason Crawford and Michael Martinez.

Toronto News: G20 aftermath: Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair to seek permission to lay more charges - thestar.com
 

arob

Nominee Member
Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair Should Resign. He will hold his police officers accountable, but will accept none of the consequences himself. He won't even apologize. His continued presence as head of this police force robs it of credibility. How do we get rid of him?

Read Rosie DiManno's piece in The Star, Why Wont Chief Bill Blair Say Sorry?

Toronto Counselor Adam Vaughan, an outspoken critic of the Harper Government's G20 Toronto debacle, gave a really good account of himself with even more satisfying insights into the politics behind the security planning for the weekend when he was interviewed on CTV news yesterday. Watch this CTV News interview May 17th 2012 in which Vaughan comments on the G20 report and police arrests. His clip is second blurb in that May 17th stream.

Adam Vaughan
hints that front line cops are perhaps the latest victims of the disastrous planning now shielded by Federal politics. It's significant that Adam Vaughan is a past member of the Toronto Police Services Board and so he knows what he's talking about. It was his downtown riding that was the site of many of the protests. No compensation has ever been paid to many of the retailers who lost so much money in business and property damage. Of course it was banks, Money Mart cheque cashing stores, gold buyers, furriers, fashion chain stores, and other clothing outlets that were the prime targets of the angry mob. The organizers had months to plan for the G20 Summit, but instead they built gazebos in Muskoka Lakes and erected a security fence around the downtown core.

It was a widespread violation of Canadian civil rights. People were stopped and searched on ferries and LRT trains coming into the city. In one case a young lady was detained and material was confiscated on a VIA Rail trains at Union Station, others were maligned coming into the Province in Niagara Falls and in Ottawa / Hull. Lots and lots of good people were arrested and their civil liberties were completely removed for 48 hrs. Over 1100 people were arrested and not charged. It was the largest mass arrest in the history of Canada, and there will never be a full public inquiry into the ordeal because the Harper government is almost entirely responsible.
G8, G20 summit costs climb, surpass $1 billion | CTV News

Beyond the standard rhetoric of, 'those who erred need to be held accountable', Adam Vaughan says all of the same things that I have been saying for years. Chief Bill Blair should resign. Adam Vaughan says a full public inquiry into the ordeal will reveal a lot more about the gazebos in Tony Clement's Muskoka Lakes riding than Stephen Harper's Federal Conservatives would be comfortable with... they don't like anything that brings attention to the costs of the 2010 Toronto G20 Summit, which exceeded one billion dollars. In many ways the watchdog report pics the Toronto Police as more victims of the Federal Government's bad decisions.

Police Cars Were Left Unattended, Deliberately

T
he burning police car was a PR stunt from start to finish. It was planned and executed earlier on other streets that day, but didn't find the right combination of hooligans, accelerants and news cameras until Sunday afternoon


Of course Toronto defense lawyer Gary Clewley references that burning cop car when he says police actions must be taken in context with the events of the day. This is the first line of defense for police and was created by Police for this very reason. Gary is perpetuating the notion that there was a riot in Toronto and things were really out of control. Its not true. But his statements find a ready audience in all of those people who watch the news and yet don't really understand the news (and how TV news is made).

Without a Royal Commission we'll never know the truth to the allegations that senior security forces administrators ordered that at least three different Toronto Police squad cars be left unwatched at the perimeter of angry crowded situations. They wanted these cars to be set alight so they could 'wag the dog' and make a spectacle of the damage. Why? Because they had to justify a billion dollar budget and some well documented acts of brutality that had already occurred and more which were about to occur. If you remember there were scenes of police brutality currently playing on the news channels and this worried the top cops - they had to show some reason for violence. Sacrificing one or two squad cars to local idiots was an absolutely brilliant way to collect the necessary PR footage of 'radical elements rioting in Toronto' and manufacture the visual evidence that's become so iconic and key to the defense of forty eight Toronto police officers now charged under the Police Act. Without a full public inquiry into the maelstrom there is no reliable accounting for the role of Federal or Provincial politicians. Even the Police Chief seems above scrutiny.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,220
8,057
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The orders cam from above, that's where the they need to start with their housecleaning. I imagine in the end though, it will mostly be front line cops taking the heat.

Yeah....this is a tough one to judge from the sidelines, due to the
inconsistency of the actions of the police in this situation. They
went from limp-wristed initially when the **** was impacting the
rotary device, to so far over the top later on regardless of what
was happening, that it seems like they where following bizzare
commands of initially "stay on the leash" followed by "no leash
at all and do whatever" and damb the torpedo's!

The extremes where so weird with no middle ground ever taken
it seems. Makes a sideline quarterback really scratch their head.

You should take the rose coloured glasses off The police arrested the violent protesters


.....and non-violent protesters, and some non-protesters, etc...later
on....but did little to nothing initially.