Efficency is not justice Boomer.
What are you F'n color blind??!!!
Efficency is not justice Boomer.
Well I sure as hell would not be one of them. Guy Paul Morin was tried twice and convicted once in my hometown for a crime generally considered to be a death penalty case in jurisdictions that have capital punishment.
He was 100% innocent.
There's a lot you can't understand.As somebody that, generally speaking, thinks the government screws up just about everything it touches, I can't understand why anybody would want to give it the power to kill it's citizens.
You're daft. Capital punishment prevents the guilty from committing another crime; that's a good justification.The only possible justification for the Death Penalty is that it deters crime.
No it's not. Since there are other ways to prevent the guilty from committing another crime, it's only a good justification to those that wish to hand more power to the government. Unlike you, I don't trust the government and would like to get them out of people's lives as much as possible. Of course I'm a real conservative, not a pretend one like you.You're daft. Capital punishment prevents the guilty from committing another crime; that's a good justification.
If it was after a verdict it would still be an active case. Guilty and done deal within 10 days, that is why you make the trials as through as possible and today the judges should already have gone over all the important material anyway. Do it via video and there are 10 trials a day rather than 1 every 10 days. Wire everybody up with a duress meter once the session is being recorded and there ya go, justice and lunch and execution, all in the same day.That case is indeed the 'poster child' for not having the death penalty resurrected in Canada.
I notice this poll is almost 3 years old...............
I'm in favor of shock rings on the junk of sex offenders that goes off as soon as they get a boner. If there was that and I has a remote then that would be 'out of line'. I'm pretty sure a guy who just had his peepee Tarazed is not going to continue the fantasy or the sexual based crime that brought on the erection. A politician would probably get a tounge device that went off whenever movement was detected. Sign the cheques and be quiet. They are employees, time we started treating them like their own book demands they treat us, might be a little painful but better it be them than us that takes the 'hit for the team'.No it's not. Since there are other ways to prevent the guilty from committing another crime, it's only a good justification to those that wish to hand more power to the government. Unlike you, I don't trust the government and would like to get them out of people's lives as much as possible. Of course I'm a real conservative, not a pretend one like you.
You're daft. Capital punishment prevents the guilty from committing another crime; that's a good justification.
How many would they kill if they spent that time in general population. Being on death row also allows you to more legal features than not being there. How about all that time be spent being an orderly at a nut house rather than using up legal resources to dispute something that has already been closely examined. Barring that open air prisons are the next step up. Devil's Island remoteness where the guards and the inmates are all prisoners. Be the new reality players or has that been overdone already?Capital punishment prevents the guilty from committing another crime; that's a good justification.
So does life in a maximum security prison. So far as I know Paul Bernardo and Robert Pickton haven't re-offended.
You're daft. Capital punishment prevents the guilty from committing another crime; that's a good justification.
How many dead people committed a murder after they died?Where's the evidence for that? All we have is evidence contrary to that. The death sentence has never ever shown to be a proper deterrent, for example one of the most crime riddled states in America is Tennessee and they have the death penalty.
Culture and single parents have a lot more to do with it.Poverty rate and education level has a lot more to do with crime rate than the death penalty
How many dead people committed a murder after they died
Poverty rate and education level has a lot more to do with crime rate than the death penalty
Basically for those who enjoy killing and torturing their fellow man.
.
That would be most of the CIA though. :lol:
I imagine for some of them, there is a personal level of pleasure derived from their job. However, since it's their job, it might make it a bit different.
The evidence for that is that no person who has been executed has ever re-offended.Where's the evidence for that? All we have is evidence contrary to that. The death sentence has never ever shown to be a proper deterrent, for example one of the most crime riddled states in America is Tennessee and they have the death penalty.
I'm for the death penalty for people who talk in the cinema, litterbugs, yappy-dog owners, and girls who post "duckface" selfies on social media.I'm for the death penalty but only for serial killers and serial rapists. Basically for those who enjoy killing and torturing their fellow man.
The cost does not have to be prohibitive.
I'm for the death penalty but only for serial killers and serial rapists. Basically for those who enjoy killing and torturing their fellow man.
The cost does not have to be prohibitive.