Latest problem with Obamacare. Too many people now have access to healthcare.
- Thread starter BornRuff
- Start date
Well golly gee! I am one of those people at the highest level of education, and I believe that Obamacare is a disaster.
And even in that population, less than 45% approve of it (and 19% are unaccounted for in that "data").
Either go for a flat out "Single Payer" system (as Canada has), or get rid of this horrible conglomeration of misfitting parts.
And even in that population, less than 45% approve of it (and 19% are unaccounted for in that "data").
Either go for a flat out "Single Payer" system (as Canada has), or get rid of this horrible conglomeration of misfitting parts.
Lol, please, treat me like the idiot that you think I am and spell it out for me.
How am I confused if I think it is strange that you attack me and not someone else for citing the exact same research paper, especially when the other person is the one who introduced the paper into the discussion and continues to cite it?
You mean the bogus survey with a huge margin of error done by Rand?
The one that Loc calls the half-baked Rand poll?
Why should I attack him?
Lol, because he has repeatedly cited it as support for his points.......
Why wouldn't you go after him for that?
Now WTF are you smoking?
He's pointing out how asinine and inaccurate the survey is dumb azz.
You are SOOOOO lost!
Where do you think he is getting the 1.5 million figure from?
He is writing off part of it, but continually referring to a specific part of it that he thinks supports his point.
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/u...t-problem-obamacare-too-many.html#post1898483
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/u...problem-obamacare-too-many-2.html#post1899034
Good gosh you are such a tool.
You'll never get it.
Tell me where you think the 1.5 million figure comes from?
Remember, if you think I am stupid, explain it to me very clearly. Just posting endless gifs and never actually using your words to make a point makes it seem like you are just angry and confused.
He's ripping the survey that Rand admits to having a huge margin of error. Don't you get it?
Points and things that are said clearly are lost on you.
Here's a gif.
It's a lot more clear if you phrase the question differently. Who first posted the RAND polling data and in what context. There's no avoiding that conclusion...
You mean how Locust brought it up to refute the claim that millions of people now have access to healthcare?
The stats speak for themselves. When a small state like Oregon has an influx of 26,000 new patients in just a few months and are expecting more then obviously ACA has brought healthcare to many who formerly didn't have it. I am sure this is lost on those detractors who rabidly oppose anything Obama has done even if their warmongering hero GW did the same things.
In the end no matter which side of the debate you fall on it would seem more people, especially low-income and marginalized people, are receiving healthcare and that can only be a good thing.
In the end no matter which side of the debate you fall on it would seem more people, especially low-income and marginalized people, are receiving healthcare and that can only be a good thing.
Now if it was only "AFFORDABLE" and not making you sick just worrying about paying next month premium.