Why does it need nukes? Israel has managed, using conventional forces only, to not only stay alive, but also to expand it's borders from the original 1948 borders. So why does it need nukes to survive?Survival -
Why does it need nukes? Israel has managed, using conventional forces only, to not only stay alive, but also to expand it's borders from the original 1948 borders. So why does it need nukes to survive?Survival -
Why does it need nukes? Israel has managed, using conventional forces only, to not only stay alive, but also to expand it's borders from the original 1948 borders. So why does it need nukes to survive?
Israel will not give them up - That is fact -
and neither will Britain, China, France, India, Pakistan, Russia, United States, or North Korea. Yet, like hypocrites, we all expect that no one else acquire the same weaponry that we "enjoy".
It works both ways, you want everyone else to stay out of the nuclear weapon game, then everyone should get out of it. Period.
Well N Korea is ruled by wackos - not as bad as Iran though. Justify it what ever way you want but having an Iran with a Nuke weapons capability scares the shxt out of many of its neighbors - and yes they also are Sunni - Western Europe to name a few.
Maybe there are more wackos in leadership positions than we want to examine. How often does N Korea or Iran do regime changes via invasion and occupation on the planet.?? Sure they bluster.......and we should note their bluster.......but why do we have to inflame it with even more threats ???
One has to wonder just how valid a threat Iran is in reality. We are so inundated with war talk , aggressive , threatening talk and lies about other places........particularly those that the west has an interest in ....that one is hard pressed to know what the reality is.
It all comes down to who benefits from these aggressive actions and words?? It certainly is NOT the populations of the target or of the one doing the targetting.
One would have thought that in this era the thirst for bloody wars would have subsided and reason would have taken hold.
Israel will not give them up - That is fact - You know it as well as i - But they can be reduced in number.
Consider that the Arab World if they ever got the skill sets - professional Military they could overrun Israel. That is another fact.
I explained in my OP is what Iran wants - The only thing not mentioned is Respect and Influence - This would provide both.
a lot of what ifs. Is that what the objective of the Arab world??? Who are you including in the "Arab world"??
Will Iran perceive it as such?? We are dealing with a different culture completely and as such a different / unique mindset.
Iran with Nukes will lead to more Nukes in the Mid East - and what does that mean - the hair trigger moves up to a level and mistakes can be made. Then we have a Nuclear War.
So it's OK for the Empire to be loaded with nukes?? (as well as a few other countries?? ) Either everyone is treated equally when it comes to self defense with NUKES...(which is an idiotic joke) or NO ONE has them??
IF they want them they will get them. Just as others have done. Bombing them to oblivion is the perfect example of why NO one should have such lethal weapons.
Note: only ONE country has used such devestation. and yet it is the one nation that wants no one else to have them. Israel can have what ever it wants under the cover of the empire. ... Is THAT fair??
How does that foster mutual trust and respect??
Your answer is BS - 1 million was rhe estimated casualties for invading Japan- Unacceptable - Do you think that a Nuclear Iran is a positive or a negative based upon the political realities of that area.
Now I am off to bed - So God Bless and kepp well.
I'm curious as to the reasoning for allowing Israel to keep it's nuclear weapons and wanting to ensure that no other country in the ME has the same capability?
ACT??? What kind of action do you suggest.?? And what is your motive for suggesting "action".
So the Iranian leadership is idiotic. Wonder how much of their bluster is just a defensive reaction to all the threats and ugly comments coming from the west .
Aggression is not the answer. Look at the results in Iraq.....and read the fine print of how things really are. Look at afganistan.....and again read the fine print where they are doing barbaric things and not even being discreet about it. Look at Libya ..another place that is now volatile. and it goes on and on.
Why do you hate him??
and neither will Britain, China, France, India, Pakistan, Russia, United States, or North Korea. Yet, like hypocrites, we all expect that no one else acquire the same weaponry that we "enjoy".
It works both ways, you want everyone else to stay out of the nuclear weapon game, then everyone should get out of it. Period.
Yeah, I know what you're saying, but you gotta look at the big picture. If we're in a room and you're ranting and raving about how you're gonna effin kill me, when you reach for the gun on the table....I'm gonna try to stop you. It's really just that simple.
The "big picture" is that there are a few countries that have nuclear weapons and the rest of the world, rightly so, feels that they need to even the playing field by having the same thing. I'm saying, even the playing field, by taking away everyone's nukes. They are not needed.
The "big picture" is that there are a few countries that have nuclear weapons and the rest of the world, rightly so, feels that they need to even the playing field by having the same thing. I'm saying, even the playing field, by taking away everyone's nukes. They are not needed.
Again, who is going to take them away? A better question would be how are they going to take them away?
Let me put it this way. If everyone is really wanting peace, then they will voluntarily give up their nukes. Anything else, just reinforces what I and a few others here have been saying.
Let me put it this way. If everyone is really wanting peace, then they will voluntarily give up their nukes. Anything else, just reinforces what I and a few others here have been saying.