How the Left Spun the Kennedy Myth

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
JFK was one of America’s most liberal presidents, right? Wrong. Former aides Arthur Schlesinger Jr. and Ted Sorensen rewrote history to make him more liberal than he really was.

President Kennedy was a tax-cutting Cold Warrior who was tough on unions (“the cancer of labor racketeering”), slow on civil rights legislation, and called abortion “repugnant.”


So how in the world did he wind up as an icon of liberalism?

The matter puzzled even some of JFK’s former aides: Kennedy speechwriter Ted Sorensen acknowledged at one event, “Kennedy was a fiscal conservative. Most of us and the press and historians have, for one reason or another, treated Kennedy as being much more liberal than he so regarded himself at the time.”

One answer is that immediately after Kennedy’s assassination, liberal authors began sculpting the story. The first culprit was Theodore White, who interviewed Jacqueline Kennedy at Hyannis Port on November 29, 1963, for Life magazine.

White dictated his account of the interview by phone while Life was being held open after its deadline at a cost of $30,000 an hour in printing plant overtime. The resulting article, he conceded in his 1978 memoir, “heavily edited her.” Among the lines that White cut in his heavy editing was this one from Jacqueline Kennedy: “All I wanted was his name on just that one booster, the one that would put us ahead of the Russians.” The line suggests that even in November 1963, after Kennedy’s death, his widow wanted JFK’s legacy not to be some kind of peaceful cooperation with the Russians on the space program, but beating them.

Sorensen himself, in his 1965 book Kennedy, rewrote the president’s story in a way consonant with Sorensen’s own dovish views and with the views of Sorensen’s peace-activist father, to whom the book is dedicated.


more


How the Left Spun the Kennedy Myth - The Daily Beast
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
Can you imagine BHO, a true leftist, saying, "Ask not what your country can do for you, rather, ask what you can do for your country."
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
John F. Kennedy was a young, handsome and very charismatic man. He was also a serial womanizer, having sex with as many women as he possibly could, regardless of his marriage vows. The press know about many of his affairs, but refused to make them public.

Kennedy was also a VERY mediocre President. He got almost no legislation passed, and he had no real lasting Presidential accomplishments. His own party (which controlled both houses of Congress) voted down the vast majority of his proposals (or just buried them).

Had he not been assassinated, his Presidency would most likely be known for accomplishing virtually nothing, and for starting and continuing, the war in Vietnam.

His aides promoted the idea that in his second term, he planned on withdrawing from Vietnam. There is actually solid evidence that he planned to do exactly what Johson did, massively increase the numbers of US troops in Vietnam.

But, he will be remembered, for another 20-30 years, as the perfect President, by the press.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
John F. Kennedy was a young, handsome and very charismatic man. He was also a serial womanizer, having sex with as many women as he possibly could, regardless of his marriage vows. The press know about many of his affairs, but refused to make them public.

Kennedy was also a VERY mediocre President. He got almost no legislation passed, and he had no real lasting Presidential accomplishments. His own party (which controlled both houses of Congress) voted down the vast majority of his proposals (or just buried them).

Had he not been assassinated, his Presidency would most likely be known for accomplishing virtually nothing, and for starting and continuing, the war in Vietnam.

His aides promoted the idea that in his second term, he planned on withdrawing from Vietnam. There is actually solid evidence that he planned to do exactly what Johson did, massively increase the numbers of US troops in Vietnam.

But, he will be remembered, for another 20-30 years, as the perfect President, by the press.

I wouldnt blame the press for that. They were keeping the private lives of Presidents private for quite some time before that. That seemed to change when Watergate happened. Personally I dont think his extra marital affairs had any effect on his performance. Same with any other politicians sex life. I honestly dont care if my MP, Premier or PM is having an affair or not so long as they are doing their job. Their private life is their private life, mine is mine. His various medical conditions on the other hand should have been known. He had nearly died several times before becoming President from those ailments and was on many different medications. At the time the press kept that secret just as they kept FDRs various medical problems secret.

His handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis seems to be in itself enough to give him a nice spot in the history books. I doubt Johnson or Nixon would have handled it as well. They were both very easily influenced by military leaders. After the Bay of Pigs fiasco Kennedy was not.

JFK was one of America’s most liberal presidents, right? Wrong. Former aides Arthur Schlesinger Jr. and Ted Sorensen rewrote history to make him more liberal than he really was.

President Kennedy was a tax-cutting Cold Warrior who was tough on unions (“the cancer of labor racketeering”), slow on civil rights legislation, and called abortion “repugnant.”


So how in the world did he wind up as an icon of liberalism?

The matter puzzled even some of JFK’s former aides: Kennedy speechwriter Ted Sorensen acknowledged at one event, “Kennedy was a fiscal conservative. Most of us and the press and historians have, for one reason or another, treated Kennedy as being much more liberal than he so regarded himself at the time.”


So they rewrote history then acknowledged the type of person he really was? Ive read the books written by both of them on the subject and they both acknowledge his flaws and failures. Sorensen for the most part stayed away from Kennedy's personal failures as he considered that none of his business and did not consider himself to be a personal friend, bug instead a colleague. RFK was far more conservative than JFK and worked with McCarthy, though he actually did go through a radical change in his later years. The views he had or claimed to have in '68 were nearly the opposite of what they were when he was in his brothers administration.

How did Kennedy start any war in Vietnam?

Put the "advisors" in.

Guess you never heard of the French Revolution 1789.

Right and left were total BS terms then just as they are now.