Hermy, this is a Black-Op

[MHz]

It's known as The Port Arthur Massacre.
There is reason to think the Port Arthur massacre was planned as early 1987 when, after a specially called Premier's meeting in Hobart in December 1987, the New South Wales Labour Premier, Mr. Barry Unsworth stated, "there would be no effective gun control in Australia until there was a massacre in Tasmania"
On Sunday, 28 April 1996, at a sleepy little tourist location known as Port Arthur, something went down that will long live in memory of Australia's collective psyche. An unknown professional combat shooter opened fire in the Broad Arrow Cafe at Port Arthur in Tasmania. In less than a minute 20 people lay dead, 19 of them killed with single shots to the head, fired from the right hip of the fast-moving shooter.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/port_arthur.htm

Martin Bryant, who was charged with the "massacre" an intellectually impaired registered invalid with no training in the use of high powered assault weapons, could not under any circumstances have achieved or maintained the incredibly high and consistent killed-to-injured ratio and kill-rate which were bench marks of the Port Arthur massacre.

what was the rapid result from this "massacre"?
disarmament of the Australian people

anyway....
here are some links you may find of interest
http://www.geniac.net/portarthur/
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/port_arthur.htm
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/palies1.htm
http://judicial-inc.biz/port_arthur_massacre.htm

A Master Gunsmith's Take On The Port Arthur Weapons
http://judicial-inc.biz/V_Beattie_ar_15.htm​

A quick question....if those people, or even some of those people, killed in tha "massacre" were allowed to carry a conceled or whatever it's termed....how many would be alive today?

ps: somehwere in those links it says that the police video of Bryant changing weapons at his car on the warf, showed a tourist boat moored at the jetty behind him....but investigations showas that the boat wasnt there on the day, it was there 2 days b4..... weird eh?​

Either that or there is something else going on, at least today. I would not put it as being impossible as being a way of restricting weapons from all parts of Universities. (as concealed weapons were only"banned' from this one particular area ???, obviously the detection method could use some sort of improvement, shutter,shutter) That most revolutions that have ever occurred anywhere at anytime have began at Universities is probably just 'one of those bumps in the night type of thing.

 

[catman]

....and all the victims and eyewitnesses were in on the conspiracy too. :roll:
It is important to be an independent thinker but it is also important not to believe ANYTHING that you read on the internet.

 

[Stretch]

....and all the victims and eyewitnesses were in on the conspiracy too. :roll:
It is important to be an independent thinker but it is also important not to believe ANYTHING that you read on the internet.

There is reason to think the Port Arthur massacre was planned as early 1987 when, after a specially called Premier's meeting in Hobart in December 1987, the New South Wales Labour Premier, Mr. Barry Unsworth stated, "there would be no effective gun control in Australia until there was a massacre in Tasmania"

The above statement by unsworth was in the sydney morning herald..... its on record

 

[s243a]

Martin Bryant, who was charged with the "massacre" an intellectually impaired registered invalid with no training in the use of high powered assault weapons, could not under any circumstances have achieved or maintained the incredibly high and consistent killed-to-injured ratio and kill-rate which were bench marks of the Port Arthur massacre.

Why is someone charged? Isn't the shooter dead? If the guy was such a master marksmen why did he need three shots to kill?

 

[s243a]

Stretch the links you posted had to do with something that happened Australia in 1996. What could they possibly have to do with what happened two days ago?

 

[hermanntrude]

he's suggesting that both were actually government conspiracies in order to gain support for gun controls.

 

[s243a]

P.S. Stretch, do you know of any "black Ops" in your town? How do you know they don't have your phones and internet bugged? They could be on to you.

 

[s243a]

he's suggesting that both were actually government conspiracies in order to gain support for gun controls.

If the idea was to gain support for gun control wouldn't it be better to entice a 14 year old to grab on from his supposedly unlocked parents gun cabanant. The guy was an adult in school. Where did he get the gun form anyway. Oh let me guess, a Black Op. Maybe they put subliminal messages into his IPOD lol.

 

[Stretch]

P.S. Stretch, do you know of any "black Ops" in your town? How do you know they don't have your phones and internet bugged? They could be on to you.

they probably do mate, but I dont give a ****
all the people in Port Arthur were shot from the right hip, bryant was left handed......
he was s'posedly left to die in the guesthouse that was set alight but staggered out with 3rd drgree burns on his back
any of you guys can pull off an act of marksmanship like that remembering that bryant was physically and mentally handicapped.
even a highly trained navy seal would be hard pressed to come up with kill to injure ratio figures like that

 

[Stretch]

a quick question...here in north america, canada and the states, is it an offence to be in control and/or discharge a firearm, whilst under the influence of alcohol?

 

[Stretch]

what if you shoot someone while under the influence?
or even if you shoot someone when you not under the influence, is it an offence?

 

[Stretch]

no body knows, or is this a grey area?

 

[darkbeaver]

Sorry to interrupt you Stretch with an unrelated question but there seems to be a lot of articles about the bee thing and cell phones. I'd like your opinion.

PS; if cell phones are the problem it's goodbye bees what, can't have insects phucking up the economy can we.

 

[Stretch]

well...if those that created the problem are also in control of the food supply..or almost in control of it, then we are in deep sh it......... monsanto comes to mind for some reason, either way they are out to control the food supply...control the food and you control the people sort of thing

[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Pay Monsanto, or Starve [/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]'Many have yet to comprehend the implications of this continuing business trend to grow, merge, centralise and consolidate. I hope the following will help. If these companies are to continue their takeovers, and rule our planet - then shouldn’t we consider what it will be like in their servitude?' [/FONT]
http://www.celsias.com/blog/2007/03/02/pay-monsanto-or-starve/


[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Are mobile phones wiping out our bees?[/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]'It seems like the plot of a particularly far-fetched horror film. But some scientists suggest that our love of the mobile phone could cause massive food shortages, as the world's harvests fail. [/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]They are putting forward the theory that radiation given off by mobile phones and other hi-tech gadgets is a possible answer to one of the more bizarre mysteries ever to happen in the natural world - the abrupt disappearance of the bees that pollinate crops. Late last week, some bee-keepers claimed that the phenomenon - which started in the US, then spread to continental Europe - was beginning to hit Britain as well.' [/FONT]
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/wildlife/article2449968.ece


​

 

[s243a]

The shooter in Virgina Tech used 225 shoots and 17 clips. Given the casualties I hardly consider that a high kill to shot ratio. Perhaps people should not be able to buy so many clips in such a short period of time.