That's bait.I checked Scientology out when I was 19. They be nutters all right but some of the girls were kind of cute.
That's bait.I checked Scientology out when I was 19. They be nutters all right but some of the girls were kind of cute.
I checked Scientology out when I was 19. They be nutters all right but some of the girls were kind of cute.
It's one of the reasons baiting is a illegal in some provinces.That's a steep drop into weird for just "kind of cute", lol.
Not that this is important, but this is bullying?
I try not to write off what someone has to say, before I actually read it, just because I'm not a fan.
You'd have to prove his commentary was unethical or he misconstrued the religion first, for your opinion to hold water.Why would Murdoch use unethical comments, misconstruing the nature of a religion, except in an attempt to gain an unwarranted advantage.
Really? Well than, by your own measure, it would seem your a self important bully.Yes this would be bullying, and from a position of at least self importance.
You have very poor perception skills.I won't comment on the rest of your post because you didn't read mine with the intent of discussing it.
You'd have to prove his commentary was unethical or he misconstrued the religion first, for your opinion to hold water.
Since to most sane, reasoned and critically thinking people, Scientology is a cult, created by a fiction writer. With the sole premise of extracting money from it parishioners as it's goal, that employs lawyers on mass to quash any and all opposition, with impunity, whose loony front man is TomKat. It's a cult, with lots of money, big and it's not unreasonable to think that TomKat is high up in the ranks.
Really? Well than, by your own measure, it would seem your a self important bully.
You have very poor perception skills.
Reality says otherwise.My perception skills are pretty good.
That's your opinion. Like he posted his opinion on Twitter.It was unethical because it was unnecessary, unprovoked, and as a newspaper man, unjustified.
I didn't call you a bully, you did.By what instance of my measure are you calling me a bully?
Reality says otherwise.
That's your opinion. Like he posted his opinion on Twitter.
Why are you allowed to enjoy things he is not?
I didn't call you a bully, you did.
Ya, I didn't think you could climb out of the ideologue box either.Okay then,
Can't be, that would put a little truth to Rup's opinion.Scientologists are actually a pretty powerful religion. They aren't a turn your cheek religion either.
When someone attacks the Church of Scientology they become what Scientologists call "fair game". That means the church comes after you with all their resources if they deem you a threat.
If a group pickets a Scientology church or office, members go right out there after the picketers. They walk with them and taunt. They put video cameras in the picketers faces and snap pictures like the paparazzi.
Do a search on Youtube. Some good stuff out there.
That's a steep drop into weird for just "kind of cute", lol.
There are? Which ones?... there are many groups much worse than scientology, why not pick on them?
... there are many groups much worse than scientology, why not pick on them?
Funny, I am amazed that Katie Holmes stayed as long as she did.
Let me put it this way: at my mothers' cottage, there was a collection of old science fiction from the 1940s and 50s, left there by some uncles. Several were by L Ron Hubbard. Bad stuff, but funny.
Old L Ron actually said that the best way to get rich was to invent a religion, and then all of a sudden, Scientology appears.
With that background, how could ANYONE take it seriously?