Better analogy would be people that live in wood houses protesting logging.
An even better one would be somebody that makes millions building wood houses protesting logging
Um....yeah, it's not really the same thing but nice try...C+
Sure it is, perhaps you're just blinded by the issues
No, I think it was a ridiculously inadequate analogy
Sadly, it has everything to do with your inadequate understanding and foundation in knowledge
OR worse from the clearcuts we call subdivisions.
They can build a pump house for cheaper closer to the gas play.
The water trucks will go away when the frakking is done but the ugly tower will stay.Overhead truck fills are cheaper. He's a hypocrite because his company does exactly what he is fighting against. I'm surprised somebody has to explain that to you
Isn't that generally the way it goes?
Development = bad ... but only after my weekend cottage has been approved and built. Then all development must stop
The water trucks will go away when the frakking is done but the ugly tower will stay.
The water trucks will go away when the frakking is done but the ugly tower will stay.