The farming industry maintains the Trudeau government's proposal would also reduce crop yields and profits
apple.news
It should tell you something about Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s environment policy that all 10 provincial premiers, including Liberal, New Democrat and Conservative governments, are now fighting him in court. Premiers have been united on the health front for years now — the common stance is...
apple.news
The feds say they just want to reduce the emissions of nitrous oxide from fertilizer; farmers and industry groups say there is no real way to do that without reducing fertilizer use. The government’s goal of a 30% emissions reduction would see lower crop yields, lower farm incomes, and push up prices for families at the grocery store.
“There was no prior consultation. There has been no modeling or analysis provided to explain this 30% target. It appears to have been pulled out of thin air,” one industry source said.
In fact, the reduction target wasn’t even developed by Agriculture Canada. It was the work of Environment and Climate Change Canada, which is why neither farmer nor industry groups were consulted. The government has been clear that this plan is part of their strategy for fighting climate change and getting Canada to Net Zero by 2030.
Agriculture and agri-food are big business in Canada, representing 7.4% of GDP in 2020, according to the federal government’s own statistics. Despite the persistent idea that this is mainly concentrated on the Prairies,
every province has a role.
While Alberta leads the country in cattle and Saskatchewan in canola, Quebec leads in dairy and hogs, Ontario in vegetables and soy, British Columbia in floral and nursery products. These moves from the Trudeau government on fertilizer will impact the Prairies and Ontario the most at first, but it won’t stop there.
The protests from Dutch farmers that have taken hold across the Netherlands is over their mandated 50% fertilizer reduction and demands to lower livestock production to lower greenhouse gas emissions.
There is no doubt that if the Trudeau government gets its way on fertilizer reductions, livestock reductions will soon follow, including for Quebec’s valuable hog industry.
Across the Netherlands, the move by the Rutte government to impose a 50% cut has seen farmers protest over the last two weeks with highway blockades, the shutdown of food distribution centres and protests at supermarkets.
If Trudeau and his advisors want to avoid seeing a repeat of these tactics, they should start listening to Canada’s farmers, something the industry says hasn’t been happening.
The anger over the Trudeau government’s plan to have farmers use less fertilizer hasn’t boiled over in this country like it has across the Netherlands, but it’s getting there.
Citing climate change as the reason, the government wants to see emissions of nitrous oxide from fertilizer reduced, not they say, fertilizer use.
Farmers insist there is no difference, that the government’s moves will cause “severe economic harm” including billions lost. The Western Canadian Wheat Growers
commissioned a report that said the plan would cost Alberta $2.95B, Saskatchewan $4.61B and Manitoba $1.58B just in lost production from their canola and spring wheat crops alone.
Farmers were among the first to see the impacts of Russia's invasion of Ukraine
nationalpost.com