Re: RE: Do You Think the U.S.
Wait a minute, here. You're making some pretty far-fetched assumptions based on historical circumstances that will never repeat. Let's not forget that technologies like radar, for example, were not commonly used prior to World War II. Let's also remember that the Japanese only succeeded in bombing Pearl Harbour because the U.S. had ignored early radar warnings, and weren't prepared defensively.
Fast forward to the modern world...
Technology like satelite imaging, radar, and various other surveillance technologies, make it virtually impossible for any large troop movement to occur without raising red flags. Let's not forget America's discovery of Soviet missiles in Cuba either. So your scenario really lacks foundation.
In reality, if Japan had attempted to bomb Pearl Harbour today, their advance would be detected long before they were ever in striking distance. The U.S. would be on high alert, and they would move swiftly into defensive maneuvres.
Of course, the likelihood of Pearl Harbour repeating is so remote as to be literally impossible. There would be no strategic defensive benefit derived from the U.S. invading Canada. Modern technology virtually, but not entirely, eliminates the necessity for defense installations in Canada.
Oh, and ICBMs from foreign countries would in no way be hindered by the U.S. occupying Canada. If an ICBM is headed your way, you have two choices: 1) shoot it down, or 2) duck and run.
Don't forget that the Canadian and American forces already work quite closely together. The cooperate on everything from intelligence gathering to training and war games. There's really just no military benefit to acquiring Canada. Especially when you consider that the U.S. would have to initiate war to occupy Canada in the first place.
Daz_Hockey said:Think about this "slightly" related one though:
Well, from what I've read, if circumstances were slightly different, the Japanese would have attacked Russia assisting Nazi Germany, Beating Russia and taking Siberia with....
well, it is certainly true to say that if Russia fell (before US entrance into the war), Britain would have fallen too.....and if the british empire happened to fall like the french one, then a Vishey Government would generally be set up in most of her dominions and colonies....including Canada, most south American states were Fascist then , so think about it.....if Canada sided vishey-like or were threatened the US would be in some SERIOUS trouble north, south east and west, Canada would virtually be it's last stop....
My point is, that in the past and now, Canada is far too strategically important for and violent acts against it.
Wait a minute, here. You're making some pretty far-fetched assumptions based on historical circumstances that will never repeat. Let's not forget that technologies like radar, for example, were not commonly used prior to World War II. Let's also remember that the Japanese only succeeded in bombing Pearl Harbour because the U.S. had ignored early radar warnings, and weren't prepared defensively.
Fast forward to the modern world...
Technology like satelite imaging, radar, and various other surveillance technologies, make it virtually impossible for any large troop movement to occur without raising red flags. Let's not forget America's discovery of Soviet missiles in Cuba either. So your scenario really lacks foundation.
In reality, if Japan had attempted to bomb Pearl Harbour today, their advance would be detected long before they were ever in striking distance. The U.S. would be on high alert, and they would move swiftly into defensive maneuvres.
Of course, the likelihood of Pearl Harbour repeating is so remote as to be literally impossible. There would be no strategic defensive benefit derived from the U.S. invading Canada. Modern technology virtually, but not entirely, eliminates the necessity for defense installations in Canada.
Oh, and ICBMs from foreign countries would in no way be hindered by the U.S. occupying Canada. If an ICBM is headed your way, you have two choices: 1) shoot it down, or 2) duck and run.
Don't forget that the Canadian and American forces already work quite closely together. The cooperate on everything from intelligence gathering to training and war games. There's really just no military benefit to acquiring Canada. Especially when you consider that the U.S. would have to initiate war to occupy Canada in the first place.