Do you have anything to replace U.N.

[zoofer]

Re: RE: Do you have anything to replace U.N.

READ MY POST

Keep us off the councils I said... but don't make a mockery but putting these nations on them.

Oh yes... great point. Russia and China never stocked WMD's. You could have used better selection.

I didn't know China was part of the evil empire. So far they're the poster child for peace. They didn't invade Hong Kong, they waited for the Brits lease to expire. Seems highly responsible to me.

China and peace.....let's see....

Involvement in the Korean War

Invasion of Vietnam

Backers of the Khymer Rouge regime in Cambodia that murdered 25% of the population.

The fastest growing large military on earth

threats to Taiwan

Attacks on American aircraft in international airspace

Backers of Robert Mugabe

Backers of the regime in Sudan

Threats to Japan

Involvement in piracy

I'd wait a bit before I nominated China's leaders for the Nobel Peace Prize.

The rape of Mongolia.

 

[Machjo]

Re: RE: Do you have anything to replace U.N.

READ MY POST

Keep us off the councils I said... but don't make a mockery but putting these nations on them.

Oh yes... great point. Russia and China never stocked WMD's. You could have used better selection.

I didn't know China was part of the evil empire. So far they're the poster child for peace. They didn't invade Hong Kong, they waited for the Brits lease to expire. Seems highly responsible to me.

well you couldn't blame the Brits. I mean seriously now. they didn't fight the Opium Wars for nothin'. How else were they supposed to get Opium into the nation without a port. And Hong Kong was it. :roll:

 

[darkbeaver]

Re: RE: Do you have anything to replace U.N.

Jersay, the UN is highly distrusted in Africa ever since
the 1960s Congo disaster.

Most surviving women and men in Rwanda observe
rather intelligently they wished the UN had never
showed up giving them such false hope and false
security.

The UN is very much like America's FEMA, full
of problems, full of people not understanding
the difficult logistics and bureaucratic problems
involved in helping others.

I happen to support the UN as it is, but with
more accurate audit trails (and Kreskin this is no
mere scarecrow issue) to make it better.

I just can't stand all the blind myths and wrongheaded
hopes for what the UN should be or what it can do.

I really like how it is with all its blemishes.

I really do think more accurate auditing and
the new word "transparency" where all can see
can only help it, not hurt it.

How about a link to support theses blatantly inncorrect and misleading statements.

 

[EagleSmack]

Re: RE: Do you have anything to replace U.N.

So it really comes down to Bush being the security council. Only Bush. Just what I said in the first place. Nothing else is good enough for the freedom fighters.

What did you run out of things to say so you attempt to put words in people's mouths?

Once again... I repeat... for the third time...keep the US off the silly "sub" councils. They mean nothing because of the foolish nominees.

Cuba and China for Human Rights... spare us. What a sham.

 

[Kreskin]

Re: RE: Do you have anything to replace U.N.

So it really comes down to Bush being the security council. Only Bush. Just what I said in the first place. Nothing else is good enough for the freedom fighters.

What did you run out of things to say so you attempt to put words in people's mouths?

Once again... I repeat... for the third time...keep the US off the silly "sub" councils. They mean nothing because of the foolish nominees.

Cuba and China for Human Rights... spare us. What a sham.

We'll put your major Iraq coalition partner Eritrea on the panel. Does that make you happy?