Crashing oil prices decimate Texas boomtowns

gerryh

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
petros said:
J
Yes Gerry the crackhead, it says production increased and trumped you crack head bullsh-t. If you don't like it increasing then I guess you can go f-ck yourself or maybe one your backhoes buddies Fact is fact.
Click to expand...


What ever you say, oh glorious one.
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,478
11,486
113
Low Earth Orbit
It's not what I say. Production is up 7.1%.

Are you trying to deny that?

And here I thought you were smarter than ****heads like flossy, I guess I did err.
 
gerryh

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
petros said:
It's not what I say. Production is up 7.1%.

Are you trying to deny that?

And here I thought you were smarter than sh-theads like flossy, I guess I did err.
Click to expand...


So what. Production is up from existing wells. Big deal. What's your fu cking point, idiot. Besides the one on the top of your pinhead. It means nothing in the big scheme of things. Productivity may be up, but over all profitability is WAY down. Get it, idiot?

You're like a dog with a bone, only not as smart, when you latch on to something you just can't seem to let go.
 
Angstrom

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
gerryh said:
So what. Production is up from existing wells. Big deal. What's your fu cking point, idiot. Besides the one on the top of your pinhead. It means nothing in the big scheme of things. Productivity may be up, but over all profitability is WAY down. Get it, idiot?

You're like a dog with a bone, only not as smart, when you latch on to something you just can't seem to let go.
Click to expand...

Your starting to get cliffy withdrawal??? What are you going to do without him? Turn on the rest of us?
 
gerryh

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Angstrom said:
Your starting to get cliffy withdrawal??? What are you going to do without him? Turn on the rest of us?
Click to expand...



and there YOU go again, off on a tangent that has nothing to do with the OP or what is being discussed. Is this how you build things? If so, I feel sorry for your clients. The results must be crap.
 
Angstrom

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
gerryh said:
and there YOU go again, off on a tangent that has nothing to do with the OP or what is being discussed. Is this how you build things? If so, I feel sorry for your clients. The results must be crap.
Click to expand...

Catching the fine details and tangents in any situation could very well be why I am a angel with the wood in the first place Gerryh. Don't be so short sighted.
 
J

justfred99

Nominee Member
Aug 2, 2015
91
1
6
North America
captain morgan said:
That makes it even more unbelievable, doesn't it?

An province with a fraction of the population of Montreal still can generate a GDP $86 Billion while the biggest city in Que does $120 B.

That equates to $75k per person in Sask and a paltry 31k for the greater Montreal area.

What a sad little number

Montreal might want to take a page from Sask in terms of how to succeed.
Click to expand...

Would it have to do with the fact that Quebec is more corrupt than Africa? Maybe there is a lot of un-reported income in Montreal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom