The consensus on climate change is not based on science?
I asked you a question. Is that your answer?
What consensus? The consensus within a minority?
The consensus on climate change is not based on science?
No it's based on really bad math.The consensus on climate change is not based on science?
Safe from what?
Anoxic events and sulphidic euxinic events.No one knows. One of the theories for the ordivician mass extinction was because there were too many plants which lead to a global cooling. Then there's Venus with its run away greenhouse affect (forge it's proximity to the sun). I may not be a scientist, but I know for sure the scientists are just as clueless as iam in regards to this climate conundrum.
Really? So Climatology isn't a scientific discipline? Or were you speaking in the rhetorical?There is no such thing as a climate scientist.
Really? So Climatology isn't a scientific discipline? Or were you speaking in the rhetorical?
I have an idea. Let's not Pollute.
Soooo that means there's no such thing at all as a climate scientist? Are you telling me that climatology is not a scientific discipline?Yeah climatologists. If you are a psychologist and write a paper on potential psychological effects of climate change you are deemed a "climate scientist".
Go through the dossiers of IPCC so called "climate scientists" sometime.
Call a paleontologist a "bone scientist" and I'm sure they'll correct you pretty quickly as well. At this point you're arguing semantics.There are climatologists indeed. Call one a climate scientist and see how long it takes for him/her to correct you.
No need. I'm well aware of the process that resulted in that so-called "consensus".As mentioned, go over the resumes of who they are calling climate scientists and the topics of their papers.
The consensus on climate change is not based on science?
Ok, now I think you're arguing for the sake of arguing. I already agreed with you. However, I said you were arguing semantics because you mentioned how one would be corrected for calling a climatologist a "climate scientist". By the very definition of the word, a climatologist is a scientist who studies the climate and its effects, both current and past. The climatologist may feel some perverse need to correct you, but you still wouldn't be wrong in calling them a climate scientist.No, not semantics when a psychologist is dubbed a "climate scientist" when he has zero credentials in anything that deals with climate or the systems involved.
Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges
Climate science or psychology?